Select Search
-----
All Bartleby.com
-----
All Reference
-----
Columbia Encyclopedia
World History Encyclopedia
Cultural Literacy
World Factbook
Columbia Gazetteer
American Heritage Coll.
Dictionary
Roget's Thesauri
Roget's II: Thesaurus
Roget's Int'l Thesaurus
Quotations
Bartlett's Quotations
Columbia Quotations
Simpson's Quotations
Respectfully Quoted
English Usage
Modern Usage
American English
Fowler's King's English
Strunk's Style
Mencken's Language
Cambridge History
The King James Bible
Oxford Shakespeare
Gray's Anatomy
Farmer's Cookbook
Post's Etiquette
Brewer's Phrase & Fable
Bulfinch's Mythology
Frazer's Golden Bough
-----
All Verse
-----
Anthologies
Dickinson, E.
Eliot, T.S.
Frost, R.
Hopkins, G.M.
Keats, J.
Lawrence, D.H.
Masters, E.L.
Sandburg, C.
Sassoon, S.
Whitman, W.
Wordsworth, W.
Yeats, W.B.
-----
All Nonfiction
-----
Harvard Classics
American Essays
Einstein's Relativity
Grant, U.S.
Roosevelt, T.
Wells's History
Presidential Inaugurals
-----
All Fiction
-----
Shelf of Fiction
Ghost Stories
Short Stories
Shaw, G.B.
Stein, G.
Stevenson, R.L.
Wells, H.G.
Reference
>
Cambridge History
>
From the Beginnings to the Cycles of Romance
>
Latin Chroniclers from the Eleventh to the Thirteenth Centuries
> Benedict of Peterborough
William of Newburgh
Richard Fitz-Neale
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
The Cambridge History of English and American Literature in 18 Volumes
(190721).
Volume I. From the Beginnings to the Cycles of Romance.
IX.
Latin Chroniclers from the Eleventh to the Thirteenth Centuries
.
§ 11. Benedict of Peterborough.
Several of these names are of the first importance in the list of our Latin chroniclers. That of Benedict of Peterborough is associated with the most authoritative chronicle of the reign of Henry II, but only (as is now known) on the strength of the fact that one of the extand MSS. of the work was transcribed under his order. Benedict, however, was by no means a mere director of other mens literary labours, for he is known to have either written or edited accounts of the passion and the miracles of Becket. The author of the chronicle so long ascribed to him still remains undiscovered. Begun in 1172, the work bears in the main all the marks of a contemporary narrative, and includes several important documents. Stubbs holds that the internal evidence is sufficient to prove not only that the chronicle was not by Benedict, but that it is not the work of a monastic writer at all.
It has not even in its most disjointed portion the disorderly form, the disproportionate details, the unimportant memoranda, the generally undigested character, of monastic annals. It displays no propension to monastic institutions, or to those principles and persons that were especially favoured by monks. The author did not even trouble himself to compose an original account of Beckets martyrdom. Whatever positive indications are to be found point to a member of the kings court rather than to a monk, or even a secular churchman.
19
24
Note 19
. Preface to edition in
Rolls Series,
p. 1vi.
[
back
]
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
William of Newburgh
Richard Fitz-Neale
Click
here
to shop the
Bartleby Bookstore
.
Welcome
·
Press
·
Advertising
·
Linking
·
Terms of Use
· © 2008
Bartleby.com