Roget's Int'l Thesaurus
Fowler's King's English
The King James Bible
Brewer's Phrase & Fable
Frazer's Golden Bough
Shelf of Fiction
The Victorian Age, Part Two
> Study of English
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
The Cambridge History of English and American Literature in 18 Volumes
Volume XIV. The Victorian Age, Part Two.
§ 12. Study of English.
No subject had greater interest for the reformers than the mother-tongue, whose educational value had been persistently asserted in England for more than a century past. But, while its indispensable place in a satisfactory curriculum might be granted, considerable doubt existed as to the best manner of teaching the vernacular, when admitted. Locke (
Some Thoughts concerning Education
) had formulated an excellent method of rudimentary instruction in English; but the difficulty of systematising the language for the purpose of tuition had not disappeared. The fluctuation of spelling and of idiom and the absence of any generally accepted manual of grammar were the points to which reformers addressed themselves. Swift (
A Letter to the Lord High Treasurer
had expressed the belief that it was desirable and possible to ascertain, and then fix the language for ever, the standard being sought in the English of Elizabeth, James and Charles; his pamphlet long survived in the memory of would-be innovators though the standard itself was shifted. A serious attempt to grapple with the asserted instability of the mother-tongue may be dated from the publication of Johnsons
which was followed by other works intended to attain similar ends. Joseph Priestleys
Rudiments of English Grammar
(1761), originally intended as a school-book, is marked by a common-sense parsimony of technical terms very unusual in writers on the subject, and by a deference to customary usage which would shock the pedant. Robert Lowth, in his anonymously published
A Short Introduction to English Grammar
(1762), asserted that the ungrammatical English of polite conversation, and of such of our most approved authors as Dryden, Addison, Pope and Swift himself, was due to sheer carelessness and not to any inherent defect in the language. The method of Lowths book was adopted and its terminology further elaborated in the
(1795) of Lindley Murray, who may be regarded as the originator of that formal, logic-chopping treatment of its subject which long made English grammar the least profitable of school studies. This celebrated text-book had no claim to novelty beyond a careful selection of what was thought most useful, and its presentation in different sizes of printers types in order to indicate degrees of importance. Its success was immediate and extraordinary. In the year of its authors death (1826), it had reached its fortieth edition, and, in spite of abridgments in many editions and innumerable imitations in Great Britain and America, it was still being printed in 1877. Its immediate success testifies to the great and increasing number of schools, chiefly private boarding schools, which, at the opening of the nineteenth century, made an English education their avowed aim.
. A proposal for correcting, improving and ascertaining the English Tongue in a letter to the Earl of Oxford (1712).
Vol. X, pp. 195 ff.
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS