|Walt Whitman (18191892). Prose Works. 1892.|
|III. Notes Left Over|
|4. British Literature|
|TO avoid mistake, I would say that I not only commend the study of this literature, but wish our sources of supply and comparison vastly enlarged. American students may well derive from all former landsfrom forenoon Greece and Rome, down to the perturbd medieval times, the Crusades, and so to Italy, the German intellectall the other literatures, and all the newer onesfrom witty and warlike France, and markedly, and in many ways, and at many different periods, from the enterprise and soul of the great Spanish racebearing ourselves always courteous, always deferential, indebted beyond measure to the mother-world, to all its nations dead, as all its nations livingthe offspring, this America of ours, the daughter, not by any means of the British isles exclusively, but of the continent, and all continents. Indeed, it is time we should realize and fully fructify those germs we also hold from Italy, France, Spain, especially in the best imaginative productions of those lands, which are, in many ways, loftier and subtler than the English, or British, and indispensable to complete our service, proportions, education, reminiscences, &c.
The British element these States hold, and have always held, enormously beyond its fit proportions. I have already spoken of Shakspere. He seems to me of astral genius, first class, entirely fit for feudalism. His contributions, especially to the literature of the passions, are immense, forever dear to humanityand his name is always to be reverenced in America. But there is much in him ever offensive to democracy. He is not only the tally of feudalism, but I should say Shakspere is incarnated, uncompromising feudalism, in literature. Then one seems to detect something in himI hardly know how to describe iteven amid the dazzle of his genius; and, in inferior manifestations, it is found in nearly all leading British authors. (Perhaps we will have to import the words Snob, Snobbish, &c., after all.) While of the great poems of Asian antiquity, the Indian epics, the book of Job, the Ionian Iliad, the unsurpassedly simple, loving, perfect idyls of the life and death of Christ, in the New Testament, (indeed Homer and the Biblical utterances intertwine familiarly with us, in the main,) and along down, of most of the characteristic, imaginative or romantic relics of the continent, as the Cid, Cervantes Don Quixote, &c., I should say they substantially adjust themselves to us, and, far off as they are, accord curiously with our bed and board to-day in New York, Washington, Canada, Ohio, Texas, Californiaand with our notions, both of seriousness and of fun, and our standards of heroism, manliness, and even the democratic requirementsthose requirements are not only not fulfilled in the Shaksperean productions, but are insulted on every page.|| 1|
| I add thatwhile England is among the greatest of lands in political freedom, or the idea of it, and in stalwart personal character, &c.the spirit of English literature is not great, at least is not greatestand its products are no models for us. With the exception of Shakspere, there is no first-class genius in that literaturewhich, with a truly vast amount of value, and of artificial beauty, (largely from the classics,) is almost always material, sensual, not spiritualalmost always congests, makes plethoric, not frees, expands, dilatesis cold, anti-democratic, loves to be sluggish and stately, and shows much of that characteristic of vulgar persons, the dread of saying or doing something not at all improper in itself, but unconventional, and that may be laughd at. In its best, the sombre pervades it; it is moody, melancholy, and, to give it its due, expresses, in characters and plots, those qualities, in an unrivald manner. Yet not as the black thunderstorms, and in great normal, crashing passions, of the Greek dramatistsclearing the air, refreshing afterward, bracing with power; but as in Hamlet, moping, sick, uncertain, and leaving ever after a secret taste for the blues, the morbid fascination, the luxury of wo.
| I strongly recommend all the young men and young women of the United States to whom it may be eligible, to overhaul the well-freighted fleets, the literatures of Italy, Spain, France, Germany, so full of those elements of freedom, self-possession, gay-heartedness, subtlety, dilation, needed in preparations for the future of the States. I only wish we could have really good translations. I rejoice at the feeling for Oriental researches and poetry, and hope it will go on.|| 3|