preview

Sight And Blindness In Oedipus Rex

Decent Essays

Analysis of Oedipus Rex In Oedipus Rex, Sophocles uses many themes to symbolize the power of destiny. Sophocles uses sight and blindness to show the limited view of mortals and the unlimited view of the supernatural. Sophocles also shows the power of fate by showing that not even free will can not have. Sophocles also uses symbols such as a triple crossroad to show the power of fate. Using many techniques, Sophocles shows the power of fate and destiny. Sight and blindness play a big role in Oedipus Rex. King Oedipus is blind to the truth about his life. Even Tiresias, the blind prophet, is able to see Oedipus’s past. “You blame my temper but you do not see your own that lives within you; it is me you chide”(377-379). When Oedipus ridicules …show more content…

The first is the prophecy received by King Laius of Thebes that he would have a son by Queen Jocasta who would grow up to kill his own father. The second is the prophecy that Oedipus received that he would kill his father and marry his mother. Laius, Jocasta, and Oedipus all work to prevent the prophecies from coming to pass, but their efforts to thwart the prophecies are what actually bring the prophecies to completion. This shows that Oedipus does not have any power over his destiny. Jocasta is ignorant and she feels that the prophecy was fake because she feels that her son is dead. “Do not concern yourself about this matter; listen to me and learn that human beings have no part in the craft of prophecy”(813-815). Although some people say that Oedipus had no power over his life, one could argue that he does have free will: in his decision to pursue the facts about his past, despite many suggestions that he let it go. In this argument, Oedipus's destruction comes not from his deeds themselves but from his persistent efforts to learn the truth, through which he reveals the true nature of those terrible deeds. Oedipus himself makes a different argument at the end of the play, when he says that his terrible deeds were fated, but that it was he alone who chose to blind himself. Here, Oedipus is arguing that while it is impossible to avoid one's fate, how you respond to your fate is a matter of free …show more content…

The first symbol that is introduced is that of the crossroads. In Ancient Greece, crossroads represented choice; people could choose where they wanted to go. Laius was killed at the crossroads, which shows that Oedipus had a choice to kill Laius or not, but since fate overpowers free will, Oedipus killed Laius. This shows that free will had been converted into fate. The second symbol is that of the swollen ankles. His name itself means swollen ankles. Yet, due to his blind ignorance (going back to the sight and blindness theme) he did not notice it. This was basically foreshadowing for him, but he ignored it. Was it by change that Oedipus did not notice his very obvious swollen ankles, or was it destiny. This again shows that destiny is much more powerful than just free

Get Access