preview

The Boston Tea Party: Was The American Revolution Justified?

Decent Essays

Conflict arose between Great Britain and her colonies, and it put America on the path to independence. The turning point for their relationship was the French and Indian War because it allowed for both sides to see the flaws in one another. The colonists did not like Great Britain’s controlling nature while the British felt like they needed more control. Differences of ideas and unforeseen circumstances helped shape the American Revolution where the colonies separated from the British empire, and they do this for many reasons. Although the colonists had valid means to revolt against Great Britain, the actions taken were not justifiable.
The colonists have the ability to justify their means of revolting because of Great Britain’s actions. …show more content…

One example of where their actions could not be considered valid was the Boston Tea Party. The Boston Tea Party served as a protest against Parliament and their passing of the Tea Act. The act created a monopoly for the British East India Company whose main investor was the king of Britain. It allowed the company to not pay any taxes which was unjust in the eyes of the colonists; as they have every mean to think so. However, their response was childish and immature. George Hewes, a participant in this event, provides an eyewitness account. He says that a group of men, disguised as Indians snuck aboard three ships with the tea and dumped it into the Boston Harbour. Millions of dollars of tea were wasted and all for a single protest. There were so many other options the colonists could have taken, but instead, they chose to do one that was completely uncalled for and not well founded. This concept was played another time. The colonists were upset at the many taxes imposed by the British government. The taxes were steep and unfair, and some of them only the colonists were forced to pay. In hopes of getting the attention of the British, a group of men began to tar and feather British commissioners including John Malcolm. Depictions of this process prove that it was brutal and a form of public humiliation. Also, other variations of actual violence against property occurred. Ultimately, these actions are completely uncalled for, and in no way beneficial to the colonies. Although the Parliament upset the colonists by implementing harsh taxes, there is by no means any justification to their

Get Access