There are many forces at work in Europe. Many of which played a good role in helping to prompt the outbreak of war. But, one in which played the greatest role. For example, I believe the two most important forces that played an important role in causing the war are Germany and Imperialism. Nationalism was a growing forces throughout all nations. But, it wasn't always unifying. It was especially strong in Austria-hungry, Serbia, Russia, Balkans, Germany, Europe it's self, and in the ottoman empire. All of these groups had dislikes and likes of each other. Serbia, for example, had a large Slavic population and wanted to gain all the slabs on the Balkan peninsula. Russia liked this too but Austria-hungry did not at all. Austria-Hungry thought that the …show more content…
But, what they didn't realize is that it already was. Most of these countries/nations were on the verge to extend its borders. In 1908, Austria was one of the first to actually put the school in motion. They took over to fuck in areas with large Slavic populations. Other leaders who have their eyes on these provinces were extremely mad especially Serbia. Austria-hungry and Serbia we're both making bows to crush one another. Eventually, to see what all the dislike was about, the Austro-Hungarian Archduke Franz Ferdinand traveled to Sarajevo, Bosnia. He did this on June 28,1914. While he and his wife were there he got assassinated by a 19-year-old Serbian member of the black hand named Gavrilo Princip. At this point come why Germany and Austria-Hungry were major causes of the war. Because of this assassination Austria
Nationalistic ego on part of Europe as a whole boiled Ferdinand’s assassination into action, pushing Europe into war. “[Serbia] has done nothing to suppress these[rebellious] movements”(Doc 3). Austria-Hungary had no compassion to the thoughts of the Serbian citizens while they ruled over them, only thinking of more territory they could dominate, and in turn, terrorist groups like The Black Hand, sprouted and eventually were successful in their mission. However, Austria-Hungary and Serbia were not alone in blame. The entirety of Europe were imperializing areas in Africa, Asia, and North America. Due to their land conquests, much of Europe was zealously fighting over who would get what area. No one stood up to be the bigger man
Nationalism: is a strong feeling of pride in one’s country and believing that one’s country is better than other country and this aggressive nationalism in the early 1900’s was a source of tension in Europe, which fueled the war. Nationalism was very strong in France and Germany; it unified the Germans, as they were proud of their growing military and industrial strength. While, France wanted to regain its position as a leading European power. Similarly, Russia had encouraged a form of nationalism in Eastern Europe called Pan Slavism. It drew all Slavic people and Russia was the largest Slavic country ready to defend small Serbia. Multinational Austria Hungary opposed Slavic national movements. After Napoleon’s exile to Elba congress of Vienna was held and it tried to solve the problem in Europe. Delegates of Britain, Austria, Russia, and Prussia agreed upon a new Europe whereas Germany and Italy were left as divided states. So there
According to Document F, England held the most land at the time, with France and Germany behind it. This led to strained relations between the countries in Europe as many were afraid that they were going to be taken over by one of the larger countries. For example, a German Chancellor before Congress says, “We don’t want to step on the toes of any foreign power, but at the same time we don’t want our own feet tramped by any foreign power.” (Doc D). In this quote, he describes the feeling that many countries had at the time before the war. He says that they do not want to anger any large countries by expanding into their territory, but he does not want to appear weak and be invaded by a powerful country. This was how many of the countries were perceiving what was going on at the time, and therefore caused tension between the very close knit countries in Europe. Thus, when conflict broke out between the Serbia and Austria- Hungary, it led to war breaking out between countries that had been holding back before. The imperialism going on in Europe was a main contributor to World War
Nationalism holds that where a nation exists, it should govern itself. The forces of nationalism influenced central Europe from Italy to the land of the Austrian Habsburgs. After 1815, the region knew the positive effects of a different style of governing and was divided into a much more rational set of political units. There was an effort by both states to unite its segmented lands, so that they could have a more international standpoint. By 1870, both Italy and the Austrian Empire had been re-established. Italy had become unified into a central power, whereas Austria-Hungary had established a dual monarchy.
Nationalism was strong during the 19th century. The Slavic peoples in Bosnia and Herzegovinia no longer wanted to be a part of the Austria Hungary nation, but a part of Serbia. All the
There were many underlying causes that could have been used to lead up to World War I. World War I had many turning points throughout the war. The war took over a huge piece of land and water for each country involved in the war. There were four main causes that have been believed to be the cause of World War I.
Nationalism has always been around, but it made its first real debut in early 1800’s Europe. Many countries at this time were striving to become independent, and get out from under the larger countries’
As the 19th century approaches until the dawn of WWI, tensions began to rise and Europe will turn into a powder keg that had ignited the world. Even though the immediate cause of WWI is the Franz Ferdinand assassination; however, the two major causes of the outbreak had made it inevitable: Nationalism had gained tensions in Europe because of intense rivalry and competition exist in many European nations and the Entangling Alliances had caused a dispute between allies versus enemies in warfare.
There were a couple of main forces that lead to the outbreak of the war. The first force was called nationalism, which is having a devotion to your nation. Nationalism can be a positive force or a negative force. It can unify nations or cause them to compete against each other. During the 20th century nationalism was a negative force. It caused a rivalry between the Great Powers of Europe. The powers were France, Austria-Hungary, Germany, Italy, Russia, and Great Britain. The rivalry was caused by many things. Competition for materials, competition for markets, and fights over the territories were the problems. Some examples of them arguing over territories is when France never got over losing Alsace-Lorraine and Russia and Austria-Hungary both wanted control over the Balkans. These disputes lead to demands for independence among the different ethnic groups. The last force that lead to the war was imperialism, which is where a strong nation tries to dominate other nations. The Great Powers of Europe were searching for colonies to take and this caused them to get closer and closer to war. It made them distrust each other and made their rivalry even worse. The nations of Europe thought that in order to be great they had to have a good military. Every nation except Great Britain had a large and powerful army. Militarism is the policy of keeping an army ready for war. They brought this policy into play because they needed a way to keep track of the army. The policy had just the
With fighting and war, it made the expenditures raise at an extremely rapid pace for all consumers in these countries. Great Britain, Germany, and France all have the most intense growth in prices. If these three countries want to have a superior navy and army, then they are going to have to have much expenditure towards this accomplishment. Great Britain has had a $4.69 increase (from year 1870 $3.74 to year 1914 - $8.23) for military and weapon purposes. For using this towards militarism, that is a cause of the World War. These increases of money prices have raised the chance of war because if people pay around you, you can advance in building your better army. (Document 1) All European Countries are responsible for the outbreak of World War 1 because all of these countries did things to lead up to war, but “failed to do certain thinks which might have prevented [the war]”. They think that every military group is the cause of the whole beginning of the war (Document 6).
Nationalism is a sense of pride one has towards their nation's achievements and the belief that the nation should be able to control the government, and each facet of manufacturing. After Napoleon’s exile to Elba, the Congress of Vienna tried to resolve the issues in Europe. Delegates from Austria, Britain, Prussia and Russia wanted a new Europe that left Germany and Italy as separate states. Strong nationalist groups led to the reuniting of Italy in 1861 and Germany in 1871. The resolution at the end of the Franco-Prussian war left France irritated at the loss of Alsace-Lorraine to Germany. France was destined to recover this lost territory. Large areas of both Austria-Hungary and Serbia were home to opposing nationalist groups, but all had the same vision to have freedom from the states in which they lived. (Crocker, 2017).
A young generation was emerging within Serbia and Bosnia whose experience of national and social struggles had taught them the effectiveness of violence as a means to achieve goals (as seen in the Balkan Wars 1912-13). It was a generation that demanded action and sacrifice instead of words and political wisdom (Cirkovic 246). Russia repeatedly assured their Slav brethren that they only had to wait (MacKenzie 58). Serbian agitation against Austria-Hungary was increased and the more the Austro-Hungarians attempted to subvert it, the more violent and fanatical it became. The fearlessness that was born from the support of Russia led those seeking Slavic unity to assassinate Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the Heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, thereby triggering the cascade that began WWI.
Starting from the 1800s, the idea of nationalism spread into Europe, and into the Ottoman Empire. The idea of nationalism weakened the Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman Empire was a multi-ethnic empire, and nationalism grew in these different ethnics. They were allowed to still use their own language, have their ruler, and have their culture, which made them easier to break free from the Ottoman Empire.
This question has formed part of the historiography of the causes of the First World War, a historical debate that has endured ever since the conflict ended. It periodically resurfaces with new theories being advanced such as the Fischer thesis, usually on account of the release of previously unseen documents or because of a shift in the political climate. It has emerged to the fore once again because this year is the centennial of the war’s outbreak and there are plans to commemorate it nationally across the UK.
While we are always reminded of the negative effects of war, it is not everyday that we learn to understand the deeper factors of war that can turn a small conflict into an international outbreak. World War I was said to have been sparked by the assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand but there are various deeper reasons that contributed to the commencement of the Great War. These factors include militarism, imperialism and the alliance systems.