Consider the following nondeterministic finite automaton. ab S u a,b a. Convert this NFA to an equivalent deterministic one using the subset construction. Show clearly which subset of {s, t, u, v} corresponds to each state of the deterministic automaton. Be sure to indicate the start and final states, and omit inaccessible states. b. Draw the minimal DFA equivalent to the DFA you developed for part (a). Indicate which states (if any) in your DFA for (a) are equivalent.

Consider the following nondeterministic finite automaton. ab S u a,b a. Convert this NFA to an equivalent deterministic one using the subset construction. Show clearly which subset of {s, t, u, v} corresponds to each state of the deterministic automaton. Be sure to indicate the start and final states, and omit inaccessible states. b. Draw the minimal DFA equivalent to the DFA you developed for part (a). Indicate which states (if any) in your DFA for (a) are equivalent.

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the deterministic finite automaton whose table of the "delta" transition function is defined as the following (Where *B indicates that B is a final state): a) Illustrate in detail the automaton defined in the transition table. Properly indicating states, alphabet, etc. b) What is the language that this automaton recognizes? Give examples to support your answer.
Consider the following Non-Deterministic Finite Automaton, in which we have represented the transition relation including the symbol ϵ as well: 1) Calculate the closure with respect to ϵ of each of the states.2) Obtain a DFA equivalent to the previous NFA.
Please answer part 3 of this question.Let Σ = {0, 1} and consider the following language L = {w ∈ Σ∗ : w contains the substring 10 or 01}. 1. Give a minimal deterministic finite automaton M accepting L. 2. Provide a “proof sketch” which shows the correctness of your automaton. To do this: a. Make a claim about your machine’s extended transition function δ∗. You do not need to prove your claim. b. Show, using your claim, that L(M) = L. 3. Show that your automaton is minimal by showing that no determistic finite automaton, N, can exist such that L(N) = L and N has fewer states than M.
Create a small deterministic finite automaton (DFA) for each of the followinglanguages over the alphabet S = {a, b}, unless otherwise specified. Write all your solutions with plain English descriptions of how each automaton works. In addition to the finite state diagram and the English descriptions, also paste a snapshot of the multiple-inputs output, using some well-chosen input strings. For example, see Figure 1 below. Problems / Languages.Note: Try to come up with the correct DFA with the least number of states. [1] L = { x : x is a string over S, and x has a triple-’a’ substring anywhere in the string }, e.g., “abbaabaaab” [2] L = { x : x is a string over S, and x contains at least one double-‘a’ but no triple-’a’ substring }, e.g.,“abbabaab” [3] L = { x : x is a string over S’, and x has an even number of a’s, an odd number of b’s, and any number of c’s, all shuffled in random order }, where S’ = {a, b, c}. For example we should accept “caabbabcca”. Note: Zero is even, so the…
Consider the non-deterministic finite automaton whose table of the transition relation "triangle" which is defined as follows (where *s indicates that s is the final state) a) Illustrate in detail the automaton defined in the transition table. Properly indicating states, alphabet, etc. b) What is the language that this automaton recognizes? Give examples to support your answer.
Please answer the following question in detail. With all the proofs and assumptions explained. We have seen various search strategies in class, and analyzed their worst-case running time. Prove that any deterministic search algorithm will, in the worst case, search the entire state space. More formally, we define a search problem by a finite set of states S, a set of actions A, and a cost function c : S ×A×S → {1,∞} (i.e. the cost is uniform, but some states cannot be reached from some others, or equivalently have a cost of ∞), and a starting state s0 ∈ S. We assume that every state s ∈ S is reachable from s0, i.e. that there is a sequence of actions one can take from state s0 such that one reaches the state s after performing this sequence of actions, and such that the cost of reaching s is finite. Prove the following theorem. Theorem1. LetAlgbesomecomplete, deterministic uninformed search algorithm. Then for any search problem defined as above, there exists some choice of a state…
Give, as a transition graph, a deterministic FSA accepting the same language as A. Justity your answer, e.g. by following the subset construction.
Problem 1. Consider the regular expression (0|1)*1 over the alphabet {0, 1} What language does the regular expression describe? Use the Thompson's construction method to derive a non-deterministic finite automaton (NFA) that recognizes L. It is enough to draw the final NFA Use the powerset construction method to derive an equivalent deterministic finite automaton (DFA). You must show the computation of e-closures and draw the DFA Use the partitioning method to derive an equivalent, minimal DFA. You must show the partitioning steps and draw the minimal DFA
Give, as a transition graph, a deterministic FSA accepting the same language as the FSA AA of Question 1. (attatched) Justify your answer, e.g. by following the subset construction
A deterministic finite automaton is defined by 5 components, it describes these, starting from the automaton shown, and it indicates what some chains reach the acceptance state and others that do not.
1. Consider the following finite state automaton, A, over the alphabet {0, 1} of binary words:(i) What is the start state of the automaton A?(ii) What are the accepting states of the automaton A? (iii) Is the automaton A deterministic? Justify your answer.
In this question, we will explore the semantic properties of propositional Horn clauses. For any set of clauses S, define Is to be the interpretation that satisfies an atom p if and only if S = p. Show that if S is a set of positive Horn clauses, then Is |= S. Give an example of a set of clauses S where Is \|= S. Suppose that S is a set of positive Horn clauses and that c is a negative Horn clause. Show that if Is \|= c then SU{c} is unsatisfiable. Suppose that S is a set of positive Horn clauses and that T is a set of negative ones. Using part (c), show that if SU{c} is satisfiable for every c E T, then SUT is satisfiable also. In the propositional case, the normal Prolog interpreter can be thought of as taking a set of positive Horn clauses S (the program) and a single negative clause c (the query) and determining whether or not SU{c} is satisfiable. Use part (d) to conclude that Prolog can be used to test the satisfiability of an arbitrary set of Horn Clauses.