look at the “Nacirema’s” cultural behaviors regarding physical appearance and health without any insight or knowledge of the specific beliefs or values of that culture, they might seem bizarre and even incomprehensible. By showing behaviors and “rituals” performed by this unknown tribe, Miner allowed others to see that the way studies were representing distinctive cultures was narrowminded and defective. Without the proper comprehension of the basis of any society, huge cultural misunderstandings could
26 males and 24 females. She then also records the age these youths left home, in order to decide if there are any correlations between the age the youth left home and the number of youths that left home (2005, 15). The author applies cultural and moral relativism throughout her entire case study. She states that she did not prepare a fixed set of questions; rather she allowed the youths to generate the questions based on their interaction with her (2005,11). Finkelstein demonstrates her prowess
For multiculturalism we understand that is the ideology or social organization model that affirms the possibility of living harmoniously in society between those groups or ethnic communities that are cultural, religious or linguistically different. Welcomes the cultural diversity and its starting point that no group has to lose their culture and own identity. The dominant culture has a consciousness of superiority over the dominated culture, showing attitudes of rejection, discrimination, and derogatory
goddess, and female genital cutting, should be accepted simply as part of global cultural diversity. “Globalization has had a profound impact on culture, largely through the existence of very powerful world information and communications system (Baker 66) leading to ethnocentrism not only on the global scale but also locally. This causes the unequal treatment of individuals of different races, ethnicities and cultural backgrounds, labeling
with people who did not care that my book at home had taught me the words for "ambassador" and "diplomat." I took my first tentative step towards cultural understanding. The
theory. Boas took the idea of evolution and made his own theory, from Darwin and made a theory that stated that we are slightly different because of our unique adaptations. “ When Boas applied this to anthology he introduced the principle of Cultural Relativism, the principle stated
When understanding identity a ‘solitarist approach is, in general, a very efficient way of misunderstanding nearly everyone in the world.’ As Amartya Sen explains, a single-minded ‘perception of oneness with our respective “civilizations”[sic]’ disregards the multiple and complex identities that belong to each human being. Sen states ‘it must also be recognized that reductionist cultivation of singular identities has indeed been responsible for a good deal of what we call “engineered bloodshed”
Test Bias and Test Equivalence in Cross Cultural Testing Introduction In recent decades we see a boom in globalization. With the different cultures coming close to each other due to technological globalization, economical globalization, political globalization, the national boundaries are fading. The consequence of this is the need of comparative studies. Van De Vijer, 1998 mentioned that the rapid change in our societal structure is increasing the interest in comparative studies. Now a days we often
large number of people “know what’s best” for other countries and cultures. The rights and wrongs that apply in our own culture may not translate to a new region, population size, government capabilities, and overall culture. Maintaining cultural relativism when viewing a culture or populous helps us from filling in our lack of knowledge with our personal understanding of life. Participant observation is the learning through participation in the activities being studies, rather than standing
of one’s culture are superior to the ways of a different culture, that wants others to melt into the western ways. In Ann Faidman’s The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down, Faidman fails to completely remain objective when demonstrating how cross-cultural misunderstandings create issues in the healthcare field, specifically between the Hmong and western cultures that created dire consequences between the Lee’s and their American doctors. Faidman uses her connections with the Hmong and the doctors