Plutarch Essay

Plutarch (45-120 AD), a Greek biographer and moral philosopher, is the author of Life of Antony: an ancient source chronicling the life and dealings of Mark Antony (83-30 BC). Part of a larger collection of biographies focused on prominent Roman and Greek figures, the Life of Antony was intended as a character study (Fear, 2008). Plutarch was exceedingly intrigued by the ways in which the personalities, integrities and shortcomings of legendary men influenced the path of history. Life of Antony is

this case we are lucky enough to have two ancient biographers who both have focused one of their works on the life of Julius Caesar. These two ancient men are Plutarch and Suetonius. By having two story tellers tell the story of the life of the same character, it makes each writer's writing aspects that much more obvious to the reader. Plutarch has a very different collection of features to his writing, but also see the importance of the military in that time to write his biography about. Overall his

The first century AD gave birth to Plutarch of Chaeronea. He was born into the Greco-Roman world during the Pax Romana, a time of peace that which had not been seen in all of the country's history. Plutarch, coming from an upper-class family, was able to get a good education and find a purpose to his life1. Philosophy was his calling and he was brilliant in his work. An aficionado of the works of his forefathers in thought (from Zeno to Plato), Plutarch used their systems to take his knack for

‘On Sparta’ by Plutarch was an outstanding and marvelous book concerning the revered Sparta of ancient Greece and the customs of the city-state. When obtaining the book the expectation was that the book was going to be a historical telling of the events concerning the military city-state that was Sparta of ancient Greece. The expectations and some more were met with an outstanding amount of depictive information provided by the author. Plutarch’s book ‘On Sparta’ informs the reader of the achievements

Plutarch was a son of the philosopher named Aristobulus. He was born in 46 AD in Chaeronea, Boeotia; and he died in 120 AD. Plutarch was also known as a historian, essayist and biographer who had left a huge literary heritage for humanity. By traveling abroad to other countries such as Egypt, Greece…, Plutarch assembled lots of information about the heroes of the Roman and Greece mythology. After that, he used that information to write about lives of heroes. He gathered all fascinating biographies

manipulated, it is impossible to avoid all sources such as documents, leaders and friends. Manipulation, the ability to alter the position or influence a person, occurs everywhere one goes. Throughout Julius Caesar by Shakespeare and The Life of Caesar by Plutarch, the theme of manipulation was revealed through countless instances showing both its sources and effects. Several of the characters in both accounts, such as Brutus, Caesar, and the people of Rome, were manipulated one time or another, by sources

Plutarch in our textbook tried to define the teaching of Plato as how to love liberty and living it by focusing on virtue, justice and morality. So, the write could explain Plato’s teaching by his students Dion and Brutus, that they were noble men who had risen from an inconsiderable background. They were both pupils of Plato whose lives were set parallel by his teachings. Dion should have ended up in sadness and miserable life. They fought together great struggles and overcame many odds to rise

the people of Athens. Plutarch wrote, "The truth is, his liberties, his public shows, and

Plutarch was a well-known historian, biographer, and essayist. Also, Plutarch was a Greek scholar, and today is considered to be a Middle Protanist. Clyde Curry Smith, a professor at the University of Wisconsin, tells readers “Plutarch was born sometime around 46 A.D. in Chaeronea, Boeotia”(Smith). Plutarch was born “around the Roman imperial administration of Claudius I”(Smith). It is also believed that Plutarch died around the age of 74, “sometime after 120 c.e.”(Smith). Along with being a historian

future western writers in regard to the interpretation of Alexander the Great. Plutarch’s Alexander’s fortune and virtue claimed that Alexander’s aim for his empire was “homonoia," the unity of mankind and “fusion” between civilizations. According to Plutarch, Alexander rejected the traditional “Greek” view that Persian were “barbarians," and instead proclaimed that Alexander was intentionally trying to establish a sense of oneness throughout his empire. In the more than two millennium since Plutarch’s