The World’s Famous Orations. America: II. (1818–1865). 1906. | | II. In Reply to Hayne | | Daniel Webster (1782–1852) | | (1830) | | Born in 1782, died in 1852; Member of Congress from New Hampshire in 1813–17, and from Massachusetts in 1823–27. United States Senator from Massachusetts in 1827–41; defeated for the Presidency in 1836; an unsuccessful candidate for the Whig nomination afterward; Secretary of State in 1841; negotiated the Ashburton Treaty in 1842; again elected Senator in 1845; made his “Seventh of March Speech” in 1850; Secretary of State in 1850; again unsuccessful for the Whig nomination for President in 1852. |
| | | WHEN 1 the mariner has been tossed for many days in thick weather, and on an unknown sea, he naturally avails himself of the first pause in the storm, the earliest glance of the sun, to take his latitude and ascertain how far the elements have driven him from his true course. Let us imitate this prudence, and, before we float farther on the waves of this debate, refer to the point from which we departed, that we may at least be able to conjecture where we now are. I ask for the reading of the resolution before the Senate. | 1 | The gentleman, Sir, in declining to postpone the debate, told the Senate, with the emphasis of his hand upon his heart, that there was something rankling here, which he wished to relieve. [Mr. Hayne rose and disclaimed having used the word rankling.] It would not, Mr. President, be safe for the honorable member to appeal to those around him, upon the question whether he did in fact make use of that word. But he may have been unconscious of it. At any rate, it is enough that he disclaims it. But still, with or without the use of that particular word, he had yet something here, he said, of which he wished to rid himself by an immediate reply. In this respect, sir, I have a great advantage over the honorable gentleman. There is nothing here, sir, which gives me the slightest uneasiness; neither fear, nor anger, nor that which is sometimes more troublesome than either, the consciousness of having been in the wrong. | 2 | Let me observe that the eulogium pronounced by the honorable gentleman on the character of the State of South Carolina, for her Revolutionary and other merits, meets my hearty concurrence. I shall not acknowledge that the honorable member goes before me in regard for whatever of distinguished talent, or distinguished character, South Carolina has produced. I claim part of the honor; I partake in the pride of her great names. I claim them for countrymen, one and all—the Laurenses, the Rutledges, the Pinckneys, the Sumters, the Marions—Americans all, whose fame is no more to be hemmed in by State lines, than their talents and patriotism were capable of being circumscribed within the same narrow limits. In their day and generation, they served and honored the country, and the whole country; and their renown is of the treasures of the whole country. Him whose honored name the gentleman himself bears,—does he esteem me less capable of gratitude for his patriotism, or sympathy for his sufferings, than if his eyes had first opened upon the light of Massachusetts instead of South Carolina? Sir, does he suppose it in his power to exhibit a Carolina name so bright as to produce envy in my bosom? No, sir, increased gratification and delight, rather. I thank God that, if I am gifted with little of the spirit which is able to raise mortals to the skies, I have yet none, as I trust, of that other spirit which would drag angels down. When I shall be found, sir, in my place here in the Senate, or elsewhere, to sneer at public merit, because it happens to spring up beyond the little limits of my own State or neighborhood; when I refuse, for any such cause or for any cause, the homage due to American talent, to elevated patriotism, to sincere devotion to liberty and the country; or, if I see an uncommon endowment of heaven, if I see extraordinary capacity and virtue, in any son of the South, and if, moved by local prejudice or gangrened by State jealousy, I get up here to abate the tithe of a hair from his just character and just fame, may my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth! | 3 | Sir, let me recur to pleasing recollections; let me indulge in refreshing remembrance of the past; let me remind you that, in early times, no States cherished greater harmony, both of principle and feeling, than Massachusetts and South Carolina. Would to God that harmony might again return! Shoulder to shoulder they went through the Revolution; hand in hand they stood round the administration of Washington, and felt his own great arm lean on them for support. Unkind feeling (if it exist), alienation, and distrust are the growth, unnatural to such soils, of false principles since sown. They are weeds, the seeds of which that same great a never scattered. | 4 | Mr. President, I shall enter on no encomium upon Massachusetts; she needs none. There she is! Behold her, and judge for yourselves. There is her history; the world knows it by heart. The past, at least, is secure. There is Boston, and Concord, and Lexington, and Bunker Hill; and there they will remain for ever. The bones of her sons, falling in the great struggle for Independence, now lie mingled with the soil of every State from New England to Georgia; and there they will lie for ever. And, sir, where American Liberty raised its first voice, and where its youth was nurtured and sustained, there it still lives, in the strength of its manhood and full of its original spirit. If discord and disunion shall wound it, if party strife and blind ambition shall hawk at and tear it, if folly and madness, if uneasiness under salutary and necessary restraint, shall succeed in separating it from that Union by which alone its existence is made sure, it will stand, in the end, by the side of that cradle in which its infancy was rocked; it will stretch forth its arm with whatever of vigor it may still retain over the friends who gather round it; and it will fall at last, if fall it must, amid the proudest monuments of its own glory, and on the very spot of its origin. | 5 | There yet remains to be performed, Mr. President, by far the most grave and important duty which I feel to be devolved on me by this occasion. It is to state, and to defend, what I conceive to be the true principles of the Constitution under which we are here assembled. I might well have desired that so weighty a task should have fallen into other and abler hands. I could have wished that it should have been executed by those whose character and experience give weight and influence to their opinions, such as can not possibly belong to mine. But, sir, I have met the occasion, not sought it; and I shall proceed to state my own sentiments, without challenging for them any particular regard, with studied plainness, and as much precision as possible. | 6 | I understand the honorable gentleman from South Carolina to maintain that it is a right of the State Legislatures to interfere whenever, in their judgment, this government transcends its constitutional limits, and to arrest the operation of its laws. | 7 | I understand him to maintain this right, as a right existing under the Constitution, not as a right to overthrow it on the ground of extreme necessity, such as would justify violent revolution. | 8 | I understand him to maintain an authority, on the part of the States, thus to interfere, for the purpose of correcting the exercise of power by the general government, of checking it, and of compelling it to conform to their opinion of the extent of its powers. I understand him to maintain that the ultimate power of judging of the constitutional extent of its own authority is not lodged exclusively in the general government, or any branch of it; but that, on the contrary, the States may lawfully decide for themselves, and each State for itself, whether, in a given case, the act of the general government transcends its power. | 9 | I understand him to insist that, if the exigency of the case, in the opinion of any State government, require it, such State government may, by its own sovereign authority, annul an act of the general government which it deems plainly and palpably unconstitutional. | 10 | This is the sum of what I understand from him to be the South Carolina doctrine, and the doctrine which he maintains. I propose to consider it, and compare it with the Constitution. Allow me to say, as a preliminary remark, that I call this the South Carolina doctrine only because the gentleman himself has so denominated it. I do not feel at liberty to say that South Carolina, as a State, has ever advanced these sentiments. I hope she has not, and never may. That a great majority of her people are opposed to the tariff laws is doubtless true. That a majority, somewhat less than that just mentioned, conscientiously believe these laws unconstitutional may probably also be true. But that any majority holds to the right of direct State interference at State discretion, the right of nullifying acts of Congress by acts of State legislation, is more than I know, and what I shall be slow to believe. | 11 | That there are individuals besides the honorable gentlemen who do maintain these opinions, is quite certain. I recollect the recent expression of a sentiment, which circumstances attending its utterance and publication justify us in supposing was not unpremeditated. “The sovereignty of the State,—never to be controlled, construed, or decided on, but by her own feelings of honorable justice.” | 12 | We all know that civil institutions are established for the public benefit, and that when they cease to answer the ends of their existence they may be changed. But I do not understand the doctrine now contended for to be that which, for the sake of distinction, we may call the right of revolution. I understand the gentleman to maintain that it is constitutional to interrupt the administration of the Constitution itself, in the hands of those who are chosen and sworn to administer it, by the direct interference, in form of law, of the States, in virtue of their sovereign capacity. The inherent right in the people to reform their government I do not deny; and they have another right, and that is to resist unconstitutional laws, without overturning the government. It is no doctrine of mine that unconstitutional laws bind the people. The great question is, Whose prerogative is it to decide on the constitutionality or unconstitutionality of the laws? On that the main debate hinges. | 13 | The proposition that in case of a supposed violation of the Constitution by Congress the States have a constitutional right to interfere and annul the law of Congress, is the proposition of the gentleman. I do not admit it. If the gentleman had intended no more than to assert the right of revolution for justifiable cause, he would have said only what all agree to. But I can not conceive that there can be a middle course, between submission to the laws when regularly pronounced constitutional, on the one hand, and open resistance (which is revolution or rebellion) on the other. | 14 | This leads us to inquire into the origin of this government and the source of its power. Whose agent is it? Is it the creature of the State Legislatures, or the creature of the people? If the government of the United States be the agent of the State governments, then they may control it, provided they can agree in the manner of controlling it; if it be the agent of the people, then the people alone can control it, restrain it, modify, or reform it. It is observable enough that the doctrine for which the honorable gentleman contends leads him to the necessity of maintaining, not only that this general government is the creature of the States, but that it is the creature of each of the States severally, so that each may assert the power for itself of determining whether it acts within the limits of its authority. It is the servant of four-and-twenty masters, of different wills and different purposes, and yet bound to obey all. This absurdity (for it seems no less) arises from a misconception as to the origin of this government and its true character. It is, sir, the people’s Constitution, the people’s government, made for the people, made by the people, and answerable to the people. The people of the United States have declared that this Constitution shall be the supreme law. We must either admit the proposition or dispute their authority. | 15 | The States are, unquestionably, sovereign, so far as their sovereignty is not affected by the supreme law. But the State Legislatures, as political bodies, however sovereign, are yet not sovereign over the people. So far as the people have given power to the general government, so far the grant is unquestionably good, and the government holds of the people, and not of the State governments. We are all agents of the same supreme power, the people. The general government and the State governments derive their authority from the same source. Neither can, in relation to the other, be called primary, tho one is definite and restricted, and the other general and residuary. The national government possesses those powers which it can be shown the people have conferred on it, and no more. All the rest belongs to the State governments, or to the people themselves. So far as the people have restrained State sovereignty, by the expression of their will, in the Constitution of the United States, so far, it must be admitted, State sovereignty is effectually controlled. I do not contend that it is, or ought to be, controlled farther. | 16 | The sentiment to which I have referred propounds that State sovereignty is only to be controlled by its own “feeling of justice”; that is to say, it is not to be controlled at all, for one who is to follow his own feelings is under no legal control. Now, however men may think this ought to be, the fact is, that the people of the United States have chosen to impose control on State sovereignties. There are those, doubtless, who wish they had been left without restraint; but the Constitution has ordered the matter differently. To make war, for instance, is an exercise of sovereignty; but the Constitution declares that no State shall make war. To coin money is another exercise of sovereign power; but no State is at liberty to coin money. Again, the Constitution says that no sovereign State shall be so sovereign as to make a treaty. These prohibitions, it must be confessed, are a control on the State sovereignty of South Carolina, as well as of the other States, which does not arise “from her own feelings of honorable justice.” The opinion referred to, therefore, is in defiance of the plainest provisions of the Constitution. | 17 | In Carolina, the tariff is a palpable, deliberate usurpation; Carolina, therefore, may nullify it, and refuse to pay the duties. In Pennsylvania it is both clearly constitutional and highly expedient; and there the duties are to be paid. And yet we live under a government of uniform laws, and under a Constitution, too, which contains an express provision, as it happens, that all duties shall be equal in all the States. Does not this approach absurdity? | 18 | If there be no power to settle such questions, independent of either of the States, is not the whole Union a rope of sand? Are we not thrown back again, precisely upon the old Confederation? | 19 | It is too plain to be argued. Four-and-twenty interpreters of constitutional law, each with a power to decide for itself, and none with authority to bind anybody else, and this constitutional law the only bond of their union! What is such a state of things but a mere connection during pleasure, or, to use the phraseology of the times, during feeling? And that feeling, too, not the feeling of the people who established the Constitution, but the feeling of the State governments. | 20 | Resolutions, sir, have been recently passed by the Legislature of South Carolina. I need not refer to them; they go no farther than the honorable gentleman himself has gone, and I hope not so far. I content myself, therefore, with debating the matter with him. | 21 | And now, sir, what I have first to say on this subject is, that at no time, and under no circumstances, has New England, or any State in New England, or any respectable body of persons in New England, or any public man of standing in New England, put forth such a doctrine as this Carolina doctrine. | 22 | The gentleman has found no case, he can find none, to support his own opinions by New England authority. New England has studied the Constitution in other schools and under other teachers. She looks upon it with other regards, and deems more highly and reverently both of its just authority and its utility and excellence. The history of her legislative proceedings may be traced. The ephemeral effusions of temporary bodies, called together by the excitement of the occasion, may be hunted up; they have been hunted up. The opinions and votes of her public men, in and out of Congress, may be explored; it will all be in vain. The Carolina doctrine can derive from her neither countenance nor support. She rejects it now; she always did reject it; and till she loses her senses, she always will reject it. | 23 | The honorable member has referred to expressions on the subject of the embargo law, made in this place, by an honorable and venerable gentleman, now favoring us with his presence. He quotes that distinguished senator as saying that, in his judgment, the embargo law was unconstitutional, and that therefore, in his opinion, the people were not bound to obey it. That, sir, is perfectly constitutional language. An unconstitutional law is not binding; but then it does not rest with a resolution or a law of a State Legislature to decide whether an act of Congress be or be not constitutional. An unconstitutional act of Congress would not bind the people of this District, altho they have no Legislature to interfere in their behalf; and, on the other hand, a constitutional law of Congress does bind the citizen of every State, altho all their Legislatures should undertake to annul it by act or resolution. The venerable Connecticut senator is a constitutional lawyer of sound principles and enlarged knowledge, a statesman practized and experienced, bred in the company of Washington, and holding just views upon the nature of our governments. He believes the embargo unconstitutional, and so did others; but what then? Who did he suppose was to decide that question? The State Legislatures? Certainly not. No such sentiment ever escaped his lips. | 24 | Let us follow up, sir, this New England opposition to the embargo laws; let us trace it till we discern the principle which controlled and governed New England throughout the whole course of that opposition. We shall then see what similarity there is between the New England school of constitutional opinions, and this modern Carolina school. The gentleman, I think, read a petition from some single individual addressed to the Legislature of Massachusetts, asserting the Carolina doctrine; that is, the right of State interference to arrest the laws of the Union. The fate of that petition shows the sentiment of the Legislature. It met no favor. The opinions of Massachusetts were very different. They had been expressed in 1798, in answer to the resolutions of Virginia, and she did not depart from them, nor bend them to the times. Misgoverned, wronged, oppressed, as she felt herself to be, she still held fast her integrity to the Union. The gentleman may find in her proceedings much evidence of dissatisfaction with the measures of government, and great and deep dislike to the embargo—all this makes the case so much the stronger for her; for, notwithstanding all this dissatisfaction and dislike, she still claimed no right to sever the bonds of the Union. There was heat and there was anger in her political feeling. | 25 | Be it so; but neither her heat nor her anger betrayed her into infidelity to the government. The gentleman labors to prove that she disliked the embargo as much as South Carolina dislikes the tariff, and expressed her dislike as strongly. Be it so; but did she propose the Carolina remedy? Did she threaten to interfere, by State authority, to annul the laws of the Union? That is the question for the gentleman’s consideration. | 26 | No doubt, sir, a great majority of the people of New England conscientiously believed the embargo law of 1807 unconstitutional; as conscientiously, certainly, as the people of South Carolina hold that opinion of the tariff. They reasoned thus: Congress has power to regulate commerce; but here is a law, they said, stopping all commerce, and stopping it indefinitely. The law is perpetual; that is, it is not limited in point of time, and must of course continue until it shall be repealed by some other law. It is perpetual, therefore, as the law against treason or murder. Now, is this regulating commerce or destroying it? Is it guiding, controlling, giving the rule to commerce, as a subsisting thing, or is it putting an end to it altogether? Nothing is more certain than that a majority in New England deemed this law a violation of the Constitution. The very case required by the gentleman to justify State interference had then arisen. Massachusetts believed this law to be “a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of a power not granted by the Constitution.” Deliberate it was, for it was long continued; palpable she thought it, as no words in the Constitution gave the power, and only a construction, in her opinion most violent, raised it; dangerous it was, since it threatened utter ruin to her most important interests. | 27 | Here, then, was a Carolina case. How did Massachusetts deal with it? It was, as she thought, a plain, manifest, palpable violation of the Constitution, and it brought ruin to her doors. Thousands of families, and hundreds of thousands of individuals, were beggared by it. While she saw and felt all this, she saw and felt also that, as a measure of national policy, it was perfectly futile; that the country was in no way benefited by that which caused so much individual distress; that it was efficient only for the production of evil, and all that evil inflicted on ourselves. In such a case, under such circumstances, how did Massachusetts demean herself? Sir, she remonstrated, she memorialized, she addressed herself to the general government, not exactly “with the concentrated energy of passion,” but with her own strong sense, and the energy of sober conviction. | 28 | But she did not interpose the arm of her own power to arrest the law and break the embargo. Far from it. Her principles bound her to two things, and she followed her principles, lead where they might: first, to submit to every constitutional law of Congress; and secondly, if the constitutional validity of the law be doubted, to refer that question to the decision of the proper tribunals. The first principle is vain and ineffectual without the second. A majority of us in New England believed the embargo law unconstitutional; but the great question was, and always will be in such cases, Who is to decide this? Who is to judge between the people and the government? And, sir, it is quite plain that the Constitution of the United States confers on the government itself, to be exercised by its appropriate department, and under its own responsibility to the people, this power of deciding ultimately and conclusively upon the just extent of its own authority. If this had not been done, we should not have advanced a single step beyond the old Confederation. | 29 | Being fully of the opinion that the embargo law was unconstitutional, the people of New England were yet equally clear in the opinion (it was a matter they did not doubt upon) that the question, after all, must be decided by the judicial tribunals of the United States. Before these tribunals, therefore, they brought the question. Under the provisions of the law, they had given bonds to millions in amount, and which were alleged to be forfeited. They suffered the bonds to be sued, and thus raised the question. In the old-fashioned way of settling disputes, they went to law. The case came to hearing and solemn argument; and he who espoused their cause, and stood up for them against the validity of the embargo act, was none other than the great man of whom the gentleman has made honorable mention, Samuel Dexter. 2 | 30 | He was then, sir, in the fulness of his knowledge and the maturity of his strength. He had retired from long and distinguished public service here, to the renewed pursuit of professional duties, carrying with him all that enlargement and expansion, all the new strength and force, which an acquaintance with the more general subjects discussed in the national councils is capable of adding to professional attainment, in a mind of true greatness and comprehension. He was a lawyer, and he was also a statesman. He had studied the Constitution, when he filled public station, that he might defend it; he had examined its principles that he might maintain them. More than all men, or at least as much as any man, he was attached to the general government and to the union of the States. His feelings and opinions all ran in that direction. A question of constitutional law, too, was, of all subjects, that one which was best suited to his talents and learning. Aloof from technicality, and unfettered by artificial rule, such a question gave opportunity for that deep and clear analysis, that mighty grasp of principle, which so much distinguished his higher efforts. His very statement was argument; his inference seemed demonstration. The earnestness of his own conviction wrought conviction in others. One was convinced, and believed, and assented, because it was gratifying, delightful, to think, and feel, and believe, in unison with an intellect of such evident superiority. | 31 | Sir, the human mind is so constituted that the merits of both sides of a controversy appear very clear and very palpable to those who respectively espouse them; and both sides usually grow clearer as the controversy advances. South Carolina sees unconstitutionality in the tariff; she sees oppression there also, and she sees danger. Pennsylvania, with a vision not less sharp, looks at the same tariff, and sees no such thing in it; she sees it all constitutional, all useful, all safe. The faith of South Carolina is strengthened by opposition, and she now not only sees, but resolves, that the tariff is palpably unconstitutional, oppressive, and dangerous; but Pennsylvania, not to be behind her neighbors, and equally willing to strengthen her own faith by a confident asseveration, resolves, also, and gives to every warm affirmative of South Carolina, a plain, downright, Pennsylvania negative. South Carolina, to show the strength and unity of her opinion, brings her assembly to a unanimity, within seven voices; Pennsylvania, not to be outdone in this respect any more than in others, reduces her dissentient fraction to a single vote. | 32 | Now, sir, again I ask the gentleman, What is to be done? Are these States both right? Is he bound to consider them both right? If not, which is in the wrong? or rather, which has the best right to decide? And if he, and if I, are not to know what the Constitution means, and what it is, till those two State legislatures, and the twenty-two others, shall agree in its construction, what have we sworn to when we have sworn to maintain it? I was forcibly struck, sir, with one reflection, as the gentleman went on in his speech. He quoted Mr. Madison’s resolutions, to prove that a State may interfere, in a case of deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of a power not granted. The honorable member supposes the tariff law to be such an exercise of power; and that consequently a case has arisen in which the State may, if it see fit, interfere by its own law. Now it so happens, nevertheless, that Mr. Madison deems this same tariff law quite constitutional. Instead of a clear and palpable violation, it is, in his judgment, no violation at all. So that, while they use his authority for a hypothetical case, they reject it in the very case before them. All this, sir, shows the inherent futility—I had almost used a stronger word—of conceding this power of interference to the State, and then attempting to secure it from abuse by imposing qualifications of which the States themselves are to judge. One of two things is true: either the laws of the Union are beyond the discretion and beyond the control of the States; or else we have no constitution of general government, and are thrust back again to the days of the Confederation. | 33 | Let me here say, sir, that if the gentleman’s doctrine had been received and acted upon in New England, in the times of the embargo and nonintercourse, we should probably not now have been here. The government would very likely have gone to pieces and crumbled into dust. No stronger case can ever arise than existed under those laws; no States can ever entertain a clearer conviction than the New England States then entertained; and if they had been under the influence of that heresy of opinion, as I must call it, which the honorable member espouses, this Union would, in all probability, have been scattered to the four winds, I ask the gentleman, therefore, to apply his principles to that case; I ask him to come forth and declare whether, in his opinion, the New England States would have been justified in interfering. to break up the embargo system under the conscientious opinions which they held upon it? Had they a right to annul that law? Does he admit or deny? If what is thought palpably unconstitutional in South Carolina justifies that State in arresting the progress of the law, tell me whether that which was thought palpably unconstitutional also in Massachusetts would have justified her in doing the same thing? Sir, I deny the whole doctrine. It has not a foot of ground in the Constitution to stand on. No public man of reputation ever advanced it in Massachusetts in the warmest times, or could maintain himself upon it there at any time. | 34 | I must now beg to ask, sir, Whence is this supposed right of the States derived? Where do they find the power to interfere with the laws of the Union? Sir, the opinion which the honorable gentleman maintains is a notion founded on a total misapprehension, in my judgment, of the origin of this government, and of the foundation on which it stands. I hold it to be a popular government, erected by the people; those who administer it responsible to the people; and itself capable of being amended and modified, just as the people may choose it should be. It is as popular, just as truly emanating from the people, as the State governments. It is created for one purpose; the State governments for another. It has its own powers; they have theirs. There is no more authority with them to arrest the operation of a law of Congress, than with Congress to arrest the operation of their laws. | 35 | We are here to administer a Constitution emanating immediately from the people, and trusted by them to our administration. It is not the creature of the State governments. It is of no moment to the argument, that certain acts of the State Legislatures are necessary to fill our seats in this body. That is not one of their original State powers, a part of the sovereignty of the State. It is a duty which the people, by the Constitution itself, have imposed on the State Legislatures, and which they might have left to be performed elsewhere, if they had seen fit. So they have left the choice of president with electors; but all this does not affect the proposition that this whole government, president, Senate, and House of Representatives, is a popular government. It leaves it still all its popular character. The governor of a State (in some of the States) is chosen, not directly by the people, but by those who are chosen by the people, for the purpose of performing, among other duties, that of electing a governor. Is the government of the State, on that account, not a popular government? This government, sir, is the independent offspring of the popular will. It is not the creature of State Legislatures; nay, more, if the whole truth must be told, the people brought it into existence, established it, and have hitherto supported it, for the very purpose, among others, of imposing certain salutary restraints on State sovereignties. The States can not now make war; they can not contract alliances; they can not make, each for itself, separate regulations of commerce; they can not lay imposts; they can not coin money. If this Constitution, sir, be the creature of State Legislatures, it must be admitted that it has obtained a strange control over the volitions of its creators. | 36 | To avoid all possibility of being misunderstood, allow me to repeat again, in the fullest manner, that I claim no powers for the government by forced or unfair construction. I admit that it is a government of strictly limited powers—of enumerated, specified, and particularized powers, and that whatsoever is not granted is withheld. But notwithstanding all this, and however the grant of powers may be expressed, its limit and extent may yet, in some cases, admit of doubt; and the general government would be good for nothing, it would be incapable of long existing, if some mode had not been provided in which those doubts, as they should arise, might be peaceably, but authoritatively, solved. | 37 | Mr. President, I have thus stated the reasons of my dissent to the doctrines which have been advanced and maintained. I am conscious of having detained you and the Senate much too long. I was drawn into the debate with no previous deliberation, such as is suited to the discussion of so grave and important a subject. But it is a subject of which my heart is full, and I have not been willing to suppress the utterance of its spontaneous sentiments. I can not, even now, persuade myself to relinquish it, without expressing once more my deep conviction that, since it respects nothing less than the Union of the States, it is of most vital and essential importance to the public happiness. | 38 | I profess, sir, in my career hitherto, to have kept steadily in view the prosperity and honor of the whole country, and the preservation of our federal Union. It is to that Union we owe our safety at home, and our consideration and dignity abroad. It is to that Union that we are chiefly indebted for whatever makes us most proud of our country. That Union we reached only by the discipline of our virtues in the severe school of adversity. It had its origin in the necessities of disordered finance, prostrate commerce, and ruined credit. Under its benign influences, these great interests immediately awoke, as from the dead, and sprang forth with newness of life. Every year of its duration has teemed with fresh proofs of its utility and its blessings; and altho our territory has stretched out wider and wider, and our population spread farther and farther, they have not outrun its protection or its benefits. It has been to us all a copious fountain of national, social, and personal happiness. | 39 | I have not allowed myself, sir, to look beyond the Union, to see what might lie hidden in the dark recess behind. I have not coolly weighed the chances of preserving liberty when the bonds that unite us together shall be broken asunder. I have not accustomed myself to hang over the precipice of disunion, to see whether, with my short sight, I can fathom the depth of the abyss below; nor could I regard him as a safe counselor in the affairs of this government, whose thoughts should be mainly bent on considering, not how the Union may be best preserved, but how tolerable might be the condition of the people when it should be broken up and destroyed. | 40 | While the Union lasts, we have high, exciting, gratifying prospects spread out before us, for us and our children. Beyond that I seek not to penetrate the veil. God grant that, in my day, at least, that curtain may not rise! God grant that on my vision never may be opened what lies behind! When my eyes shall be turned to behold for the last time the sun in heaven, may I not see him shining on the broken and dishonored fragments of a once glorious Union; on States dissevered, discordant, belligerent; on a land rent with civil feuds, or drenched, it may be, in fraternal blood! Let their last feeble and lingering glance rather behold the gorgeous ensign of the Republic, now known and honored throughout the earth, still full high advanced, its arms and trophies streaming in their original luster, not a stripe erased or polluted, nor a single star obscured, bearing for its motto no such miserable interrogatory as, “What is all this worth?” nor those other words of delusion and folly, “Liberty first and Union afterward”; but everywhere, spread all over in characters of living light, blazing on all its ample folds, as they float over the sea and over the land, and in every wind under the whole heavens, that other sentiment, dear to every true American heart—Liberty and Union, now and for ever, one and inseparable! | 41 | | Note 1. Delivered in the United States Senate on January 26, 1830, and sometimes called the speech on the Foote Resolution. For the text of this resolution, see note to Hayne’s speech on a previous page. Webster had prepared no written copy of his speech, having with him at the time only some notes jotted down on a few sheets of paper. Its delivery, says Lodge, one of his biographers, “was practically extemporaneous.” Webster, in reply to inquiries as to what he had done to prepare himself, is reported to have said that “his whole life had been a preparation for the reply to Hayne.” Abridged. [back] | Note 2. Senator from Massachusetts, 1799–1800; secretary of war, 1800; secretary of the Treasury, 1800–1804; candidate in 1816 for governor of Massachusetts, on a platform opposing the Hartford Convention. Defeated by 2,000 votes. [back] | |
| CONTENTS · BOOK CONTENTS · INDEX TO AUTHORS · BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD |  | |  | | + see more popular essays - hide popular essays - These Past Couple Of Years We Have Seen All Types Of Racism
- The Revolution Is Us By David C. Stone
- Analysis Of John Keats 's Bright Star
- The Suv Automobile Market From 2000-2016
- Human Resource Training For Gap Inc.
- Estimating The Mixing Density Of A Mixture Distribution
- The Epidemic Of Infectious Disease
- To Kill a Mockingbird: Scout's Character Development
- Project Management : A Task And Building Interpersonal Skills
- The Use of Cars Causes Market Failure. to Achieve an Efficient Use of Resources It Would Be Better If Governments Intervened to Affect Both the Production and the Use of Cars. Explain the Meaning of the Terms bMarket
- What I Would Be A Business
- Sexuality From Elementary School
- The True Cost Of The Garment Industry
- Digital Tool : Red Jumper Limited
- United Beef Packers
- There 's Nothing But Love : Brokeback Mountain
- Feminism, By Debra Baker Beck
- Interior Dorm Design Company For Dorms
- United Nations International Children 's Emergency Fund
- Japanese and Indian Cultures
- Impact of International Trade in Nigeria
- The 's Breivik Is A Far Right Terrorist Who Perpetrated The 2011 Norway Attacks
- Exam 1 Review
- Jane Austen 's Novel And Literature
- Benefits And Benefits Of Internships
- Dualism And Belief That The Mind And Brain
- Community Revitalization As A Research Problem
- The organisation is customer focused and is flexible to changing need of the customer as gaining
- A Results Oriented Hybrid It Project Manager With Experience Developing And Incorporating Business Requirements And Change Request
- Universal Basic Income : Solution For An Automated Future
- How Knowledge Is Gained?
- How Money Has Become The Enemy Of Our Society
- Human Physiology Lab
- Network Operating Systems
TASK1
1.1)
Brief INTRODUCTION
There are 5 versions of Windows Server
- The Impacts of Oil Spills on Marine and Terrestrial Ecosystems
- The Strategy For Growth By Amazon Inc.
- Network Monitoring And Packet Analysis. A Network Monitoring
- The Rebound Effect For The Disabled Dancer
- The First Thanksgiving
- Deception Versus Truth : Illusion Versus Reality
- The Jazz Age Of The 1920 ' S
- The Discovery Of The Indigenous Native Peoples
- Range of Decision to Be Taken
- Blade Runner By Ridley Scott
- 1. Definition of Acid and Bases:
1.1 Arrhenius definition of acid and base:
Arrhenius Acid:
The
- Learning From The Unit On Division
- The Federal Student Loan Program Options
- A Study On Common Cancer Treatments
- Analysis Of The Article ' Why Do Anything? '
- Alexander The Great : Legacy Of A Conqueror
- An Analysis Of Anne Fadiman 's ' The Spirit Catches You And You Fall Down '
- Questions On Organizational And Business Management
- Social Media Is The Sharing Of Ideas Using Online Networks,
- The Monkey 's Paw : Plot Elements ( Mini Summary )
- Women in Sports 19th and 20th Century
- Andreas Vesalius
- Evolution
- Analysis Of Coco 's Chocolate Cafe
- Analysis Of The Movie ' Holden Talks With Mr. Spencer
- rough
- Setting Up Restaurant
- Fear Of The Blue
- Anti Diabetic Activity Of Sea Cucumber
- Jury System Of Ancient Greece
- Jetblue And Jetblue 's Success
- Distinctively Visual Learning and Teaching Program
- The Remains Of The Day And White
- Apples Ethics and Social Responsibility
- Personal Statement On Professional Identity Development Survey
- Eros Embrey. Mrs. Kelly. Honors English 9. 22 Mar. 2017.
- A Look At The Advertisement
- Challenges Faced By Logistics Industry
- Steps For Start Your Business
- Scout As A Eagle Scout Award
- Old South, New South, or Down South
- North Kore A Threat Of World Security
- Job Shadowing a Dentist
- Religion in Brazil
- Movie Review : ' The Conjuring 2 '
- Analysis Of The Play ' The Play Comes From One Of Louis ' Lines '
- How Can A God Of Love?
- Using Engines Used And Manufactured By Maruti Suzuki
- Analysis Of Emily Dickinson 's Poem, And The Person
- Was King a Pan-Africanist? Martin Luther King and the African Liberation Movements
- Agent Orange : A Herbicide / Defoliant Used By The U.s. Military During The Vietnam War
- Slavery And The Slavery Of Slavery
- Characteristics Of Intellectual Disability And Strategies
- Non Linear Behaviour And Chaos
- Case Study Analysis: Early Childhood. Chantiara L. Johnson.
- The Note On Youtube And How It Can Be An Everyday Person
- Business Proposal Eco/561
- H 17 Service Provision For Clients With The Vocational Goal Of Self- Employment
- Reflective Essay
- Mark Twain's Advice to Youth
- Concepts of the Cold War
- Rain Abdelaziz.Mrs. Goldman . ObamabS Last Speech .. The
- Starbucks Sustainability Report
- The Un Convention On The Rights Of The Child
- Old Books Smell Better Than Flimsy Tablets
- Segregation Of The United States
- The Phenomenon Of Human Migration
- Global Strategy Of Hong Kong And Shanghai Bank
- The Fast Food Industry
- The Islamic Faith Has Come Under (Unjust) Mass Scrutiny
- Socrates Plato Aristotle and Immanuel Kant Views on Happiness Government Religion and Objectivity
- Men Who Have Sex With Men
- Narrative And Accompany The Award Of Legion Of Merit
- Islam And The Middle East
- Mental Illness And Its Effect On Self Esteem And Promotes Social Isolation
- Presentation Of National Convention At Goa
- H & M 's Business Plan
- Personality Theory
- Gears
- The Light Energy Absorbed By Colored Compounds
- Age and Second Language Acquisition
- Pgd : Pre Implantation Genetic Diagnosis
- Autism Spectrum Disorder ( Adhd )
- Political Systems : Political System
- Wauwatosa Wisconsin Is A Suburb Located Immediately West
- The Five Habits Of Highly Effective People
- Analysis Of The Absolutely True Diary Of A Part Time Indian
- Love Or Above By Christie Marie Sheldon
- Advantages And Disadvantages Of Traditional Literacy
- The First Fundamental Theorem Of Welfare Economics
- Communication Breakdown Case Study
- The Hills Like White Elephants By Ernest Hemingway
- Global Migrations Between 1700 Ce And 1900 Ce
- The Supreme Court Of Canada
- Ethnocentrism: with Whom Resides the Heart of Darkness?
- Immigration Reform
- Jonathan Livingston Seagull 's Life Of A Seagull
- Nature Between Nature And Nature
- Food And Social Justice By Martha C. Nussbaum
- Bipolar Disorder, Formerly Known As Manic-Depression, Is
- Factors Contributing With The Growing Of Income Inequality
- Samsung Electronics Company Strategic Management System
- Presentation : Audience On The Patient With Diabetes ( Ministry Of Health, 2015 )
- Role Of Laparoscopic, Robotic Assisted And Open Surgery
- Intellectual Disabilities And Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- American Beauty Is An American Drama Film Released
- Massimo Dutti Marketing Plan
- Borders Are One Of The Most Pervasive Topics In Contemporary
- The Iliad Of All Time
- Morality And Its Effect On Society
- Bank Of Americ An American Global Banking Corporation
- The Misunderstanding About Native Americans And Americans
- The World War II ( Wwii )
- Have Aboriginal Canadians Been Victims Of Genocide Essay
- Tacitus And Roman Imperialism
- The concept of sociological imaginations allows us to get out of one's own judgment zone with
- Monologue Scene Essay
- The Theory Of Intersectionality And Gender Inequality
- The Diary Of A Warrior
- Nature Vs Nurture Essay
- Seneca A Genius Or Overrated
- Collectivism Vs. Individualism : The Unknown Citizen And Jonathan Swift 's A Modest Proposal
- Personal Narrative : My Best Friend
- Descriptive Essay : Losing Someone Hurts
- The El Camino 's Life
- Christabel Theme
- Descriptive Essay : The Swings
- Personal Narrative : My Best Friend
- Nuclear Power Sources For Space Exploration
- Niccolo Machiavelli And Plato
- Plessy Vs. Ferguson And Brown V. S. Board Of Education
- Genuine Parts Company 's Background
- The Monster By Walter Dean Myers
- Faculty Professionalism, Respect, And Trust
- Analysis Of The Book ' Fifth Business '
- A Report On Bacillus Anthracis
- Get Out Film Analysis
- The Spring Of 2017, By Jon Ledecky / Scott Malkin Era Of Ownership, Manager, Head Coach
- Quest For Love : Their Eyes Were Watching God
- Cheating Husband By Jess Vinson
- Competitive Analysis Of Mcdonalds
- Paganism In Beowulf
- America Is A Melting Pot
- Court Of Appeal, Civil Division
- Analysis Of Locke 's Tabula Rasa Theory
- A Brief Note On Mrs. Lawson Boice
- The Full Monty By Peter Cattaneo
- Management Accounting
- Influences on Ethics
- The Case New York Times Co. Vs. United States
- Physical Therapist
- Marketing Environment Of Dubai : A Tourist Destination
- Second Amendment : The Right Of Bear Arms
- Personal Narrative : Becoming A Therapist
- Movie Report : ' The Fall Festival '
- Correctional Rehabilitation Programs Of California
- Strength In What Remains. Kathleen Disselkoen:. Cornerstone
- The Administration Of Contrast Media
- Kunio Maekawa is an architect who designed and built his own house, The Maekawa House, in
- The Job Of The Drill Sergeants
- Women's Roles of the 18th Century
- The Battle Of Jericho By Joshua Huxley
- Compare and Contrast the Whiskey Rebellion with Shaybs Rebellion.
- Batman And Mr Freeze Fortune Review
- The California Future Farmers Of America
- Are Women Better Parents Than Men - Essay 2
- My Family And I Took A Cruise Abroad
- American Psycho Book to Movie Essay
- The Trials And Tribulations Of A Transformational Leader
- Individualism Vs Collectivism And Collectivism
- Imagine Coming Home To Your Father Or Mother And Them Forcefully
- Information Collection Of Prison Assault
- Swot Analysis : Starbucks Company 's Mission, Vision, And Primary Stakeholders '
- Iron Jawed Angels
- The Legalization Of Marijuana Effects
- Honda Motor Company Analysis
- Critical Appraisal Of The Various Aspects Of Online Marketing
- My Views On Sex Over My 34 Years Of Life
- Response to "Towards a Definition of Creative Nonfiction" by Brett Lott
- Analysis of Special Economic Zones in India
- Poverty And Chances Of Accomplishing The American Dream
- A Short Note On The Nurse Patient Relationship Theory
- Description Of A Flight Recorder
- The Work Of Mill : The Foundation Of Liberalism And Modern Day Politics
- The Peony Pavilion : Chinese Play By Tang Xianzu
- For Most People, The Name Aaron Hernandez Was Synonymous
- A Dreary Melbourne Day Of Forecasted Downpours
- Section{Secure Cloud Computation: Threats, Requirements
- The Death Of The Frontier And Progressive Era
- Zoos Are Saving Endangered Animals From Extinction
- History Of The Legislation / Case : Honig Vs. Doe
- A Research Study On Anticoagulant Activity
- Thoughts on Austen's Persuasion
- What I Never Thought About Is Furniture Were Consider A Form Of Art
- Homeboy by Malcolm X
- Occupiers Liability
- Horizontal Analysis : Horizontal And Vertical Analysis
- Educational Needs Of Children With Learning Disabilities
- The Discovery Of The Night
- Xeco 212 Appendix B
- The American Scholar By Ralph Emerson
- Job Satisfaction At The Workplace
- Effects Of Block Scheduling On Academic Achievement
- The Communication Strategies That Involving Actors Adopted During The 2015 Paris Terrorists Attacks
- Different Ways Nonverbal Communication Is Expressed, Examples Are Expressions, Eye Contact, And Body Language ( Weitz
- My First Thought When I Gained Consciousness
- What Is Hrm Can Improve Organisational Performance?
- Employment Relationship Is Critical Within The Workplace
- The Voting Rights Act Of 1965
- Media 's Negative Influence On Public View Of Law Enforcement
- Animal Experimentation Is Cruel And Needs
- Fashion Design Is The Top Of Your Head, Right?
- Joseph Conrad 's Heart Of Darkness
- The Haitian Revolution
- The Rise Of Fascism During Nazi Germany And Germany
- `` Despues De Lucia ( 2012 ) Is The Second Feature Film Written And Directed By Mexico City
- Child Abuse Is The Worst Thing That Can Be Stopped
- Descartes ' First Meditations By Rene Descartes
- Diabetes : Diabetes And Type 2 Diabetes
- A Brief Note On Physician Assisted Suicide ( Pas )
- Teachers, Staff, And Coaches Of Inderkum High School
- Factors That Affect A Child 's Development
- Los Angles And Angeles Angles
- Cyber Surveillance And Cyber Security
- Gender And Gender : A Sociological Perspective On A Clearer Perception Of The Philosophy And Professional Objectives
- Nostalgia As A Medical Condition
- Inclusion And Requirements Of The Areas Of Learning And Development
- Representation Of Queer Characters On Children Television
- The Glass Ceiling : Are Women Treated Differently?
- Comparison Of Greco Roman And Ancient Mexican Practices
- `` Girl Interrupted `` : A Of A Woman Named Susanna Kaysen
- What Are Eating Habits?
- Why Homosexual Marriage Is Harmful And Must Be Opposed
- Strategic Pathway For Nexus 6 Smartphone
- Theories And Principles Of Murray Bowen 's Family Systems Theory
- Advantages And Disadvantages Of Obama Care
- Use Of The Telephone For Diabetes
- Oprah Winfrey 's Ideas, Services, And Products
- High School Is Becoming A Trend For Modern Day Students
- The Sumerian Goddess Of Sexual Love And Warfare
- A Long Term Care Resident
- Analysis Of Shakespeare 's ' Macbeth At The Arden Theatre '
- The Article ' Journal Times Editorial : Abortion Should Be Legal
- `` Ports Of Sorrow '
- Consumer Electronic Products, Telecom Industry And Globalization
- Frederick Douglass, An African American Reformer, Abolitionist, And Writer
- Hip Hop Wars By Tricia Rose
- The Ethical Implications Of Healthcare
- Smoking Is A Problem Of Smoking
- Plant Biomass : A Source Of Energy
- Minimum Wage : A State Of Economic Recovery
- The Idea Of A University
- The Association Between Metacognitive Beliefs And Auditory Hallucinations
- Child Abuse Is The Worst Thing That Can Be Stopped
- Virtue Ethics And Care Ethics
- Monsters And The Core Program
- Patient 's Wishes Verses Family
- Autism Spectrum Disorder ( Asd )
- Vanity Vs. Morality : From Victorian England
- White Privilege By Paula Rothenberg
- Obesity Is Too Much On Fast Food
- Analysis Of The Book ' The Soldiers '
- Where Are All The Women?
- Prosocial Behavior And Human Social Life
- The Importance Of Professional Skills For Pharmacists
- Bilingual Essay : The Bilingual Brain
- Questions On Feminist Identity And Reactions Of Gender Discrimination
- Architecture As Landscape Of Memory
- American Involvement With Japan After The Attack On Pearl Harbor
- The Problem Of E Waste
- The Perception Of The Police Officer
- The Country Of Mexico, Economy, Economic Growth, And International Balances
- The Striped Pajamas By John Boyne
- Law Enforcement Should Be Allowed By Civilians Since It Is A Constitutional Right Of The People
- Ethics : Good Or Bad
- Important Factors When Developing Rural Health Care
- School Hour And The School Day
- Graduation Speech : My Science Fair Partner
- Benefits Of Genetically Modified Crops
- My Personal Project On Domestic Violence
- Adaptations And Applications Of Physical Extremes
- Biblical Symbols Of Modern Day America
- Main Economic Characteristics Of A Free Market Economy
- The Role Of Eyewitness Testimonies On The Criminal Justice System
- Bill Is A Proposal For A New Law
- Child Rearing Styles Are Different As The Parents Are
- Katherine Mansfield 's The Garden Party
- The Narrative Of The Ip Man Films
- The Most Gifted : Othello By William Shakespeare
- Analysis Of Terry Gilliam 's ' The Season Of This Dystopia, Controlled By Pitiless Bureaucrats And Synergetic Police '
- The Tragedy Of Zoe Collins
- The Issue Of Gun Control
- Inequality Is A Natural Side Effect Of A Capitalist Economy
- The Great Gatsby By F. Scott Fitzgerald
- The Supreme Court 's Power Struggle Over The Abortion Debate
- Advertising : Advertising And Advertising
- The Battle Of The Cold War
- Tuberculosis : A World 's Second Deadliest Disease
- Topics On Language And Culture
- A Brief Note On The And Its Effects On The Wastewater Treatment
- War Between Mexico And The United States
- St. Taylor 's ' The And His Sacrifice Said That The Jewish Perception Of Atonement
- The World Of Soccer And ( American ) Football
- The Respiratory System, And Homeostasis, Balance And Gas Exchange
- `` Do Not Push `` And `` Marco Polo ``
- Australian Health Care Services For Indigenous Australians
- No Single Issue Movements Will Inevitable Fail
- Relationship Between Tourism And The Film Life And Dept
- Family Theory And Family Development Theory
- President Abraham Lincoln : A Politics With A Purpose
- Global Policy Regarding Religious Accommodation
- The Representational Theory Of Mind
- Analysis Of Homer 's ' The Iliad '
- 2016 Boston Olympics A Chance
- Women 's Oppression And Physical Abuse
- A Reflection On My Future Practice As A Registered Nurse
- Abuse : Be The Solution Not The Problem
- Critique Of A Research Article
- Great Influence Of Franz Kafka 's The Metamorphosis
- Health Care Workers Risk Exposure Infectious Diseases
- Juvenile Delinquency And Its Impact On Society
- The Assassination Of John Fitzgerald Kennedy
- Popular Culture 's Obsession With Morbid Subjects
- Musical Elements Of The Vietnam War
- A New Space Age
- Behavioral Therapy And Cognitive Therapy
- Modern Day Baseball ( Lanham )
- Rock Star, Meet Teetotaler Essay
- Wwii And How It Create Employment
- Domestic Violence Problem Question Paper
- Functional Departments Of Hdfc.
- The Diver
- Planning And Budgeting For An Incident Response
- Letter Of An Introduction Letter
- The Characteristics Of Jean 's Ethical Dilemma
- The For A Long Time Companies
- Risk Avoidance And Its Effect On A Business
- Eva Peron
- Disguise And Shakespeare 's ' The Merchant Of Venice ' And ' Twelfth Night '
- When Completing An Internship Is A Learning Experience
- Common Themes Of Inclusive Education
- A Research Study On T Test
- Police Brutality Has Increased Throughout The United States
- Flextronics : Human Resource Strategy
- Managerial Economic Perspective Of The Maker Of Tutor 's Frozen Feasts
- Family Structures Are Extremely Varied In TodaybS Society.
- Depression : Symptoms And Treatment
- Values Are Expressed As Means B1 Standard Error
- Case Study : Foreclosure Case Scenario
- Eating Meat
- The Worst Of Child Sex Abuse
- Women And Women Of The Chesapeake Area During The Nineteenth Century
- If You Cross The River You Are A Criminal
- Thalassemia is a blood disorder transferred through families. It occurs when the body makes less
- Building Best Practice in Human Resource Management
- The Crusades As An Act Of Christian Aggression Against Arab Muslims
- Analysis Of Kill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee
- The Effects Of Sexual Assault On Children
- Dilemmas Of Louis Malle And Catherine Breillat
- Who 's Really Control - Is Your Mind A Runaway Train?
- Challenging Inequity: . I Saw A Great Establishment Of
- Customer Service At Dunmore Home Improvement
- Sex Counseling With Client 's Treatment
- Analysis of Antigone
- Significance And Social Of Infants
- The Effects Of Climate Change On The Ocean
- Business Practices Of United Arab Emirates
- Cardiovascular Regulation Of Plasma Volume
- Modeling Of Forecasting Inflation On Nepal
- The Christianity Of Persecution Of The Early Church
- Parametric Study Of Stability Of Pond Ash Embankments
- Beowulf: the Pagan & Christian Epic Hero
- The Threat Of Global Warming
- Imprisonment in Frankenstein
- Animal Farm Answers
- Is The Outlaws A Motorcycle Club Born?
- The Progressive Tax System Of The United States
- Serving in the Army
- Toleration
- Science, Technology, And Exploration
- Hydraulic Fracturing Has Recently Grown In Popularity As
- A Training On Cold Storage
- A Brief Note On The Major Micro Vascular Complication Of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- The Resurrection Of Jesus And The Creation Of Adam By Jean Baptise Camille Corot
- Jacques D ' Arc And His Wife Isabelle
- My Dream Home Is The Outer Exterior
- The Great Hero Odysseus ' Return Of Ithaca
- The Aspects Of Gender Roles
- Analysis Of The Book ' I Hear You Hanna '
- Anne Moody 's Coming Of Age
- Computer Security Breaches Are Caused By Vulnerabilities
- The And Lay Followers And The Buddhist World
- Trait Oriented Personality And Personality Traits
- The Leadership Development Program ( Ldp ) That Bb & T Offers
- The Modernization Of Japan During The Meiji Restoration
- The Religious Aspect Of Social Conflict Theory
- Testing Is Not A Popular Studying Technique
- Logos, Ethos, And Pathos Appeals
- Health Care Systems : The Uk, Canada, And The United States
- Dear Bb & T 's Leadership Development Program Selection Committee
- Review Of ' An Unsettling Influence Of Memory On The Acropolis
- Plagiarism : Plagiarism And Plagiarism
- Toys And What They Signify
- Analysis Of The Article ' The Mansion ' By Michael Lewis
- An Adaptive Intern At Tiger 's Gymnastics
- What Makes A Woman Feel Beautiful?
- Why Is Marijuana Illegal?
- The Works Of Haydn And Mozart
- Religion : A Unified System Of Beliefs And Practices
- The Financial Infrastructure Of The Industrial Revolution
- I Felt My Heart Drop
- Shame, By Dick Gregory
- Battle Royal, By Ralph Ellison
- The Story Of An Hour By Kate Chopin
- A Research Study On School Psychology
- The United States : The Dream Act Was Introduced By Senators Dick Durbin And Orrin Hatch
- Evaluation Of Eloise 's Current Financial Position
- How Do We Define Environmental Psychology
- The Hamilton Rating Scale For Depression
- I Attended A Summer Program At Columbia University
- Hiv / Aids : Infectious And Parasistic Diseases
- God Is Above All, Through All And All
- Cell Phones During School Day
- Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Word Strength
- Organizational Behavior And Its Effect On The Employees And Business As A Whole
- Analyzing The Thoughts Of Ancient Philosophers
- Life With And Without Coffee
- Teamwork And Collaboration Of The High School Years
- Week 6 Integrating The Into Ehr Platforms Db 6401-3 Main Post
- Why We Should Be More Open Minded
- Review Of ' Borders ' By Thomas King
- The Industrial Revolution During The Nineteenth Century
- Animal Production And Its Effect On The Climate Change
- Why Is Energy Consumption So An Issue?
- Should The Right Equipment For Donation Or Testing Drawing Blood?
- Control The Wildfires Of Alberta Canada
- Can Failure Leads For Success? ' Praise Of The F Word By Mary Sherry
- The Number Of Mobile Cellular Networks Operators Who Can Effectively Share Infrastructure On A Base Station
- The Juvenile Age Of Just Five Years Old
- A Reflection On The Racquetball Curriculum
- My Education Is The Most Important Part A Human Being
- The Impact Of Social Work On My Work And Life
- The Gender Roles Of A Woman
|
|
Shakespeare · Bible · Strunk · Anatomy · Nonfiction · Quotations · Reference · Fiction · Poetry |
© 19932020 Bartleby.com · [Top 150] · Subjects · Titles · Authors · World Lit · Free Essays |
|
|
|