case Summary 21

pdf

School

Rowan University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

CMS-0442

Subject

Accounting

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

1

Uploaded by BrigadierPowerWildcat31

Report
case Summary 21.2:: Myers v. LHR, Inc., 543 F.Supp.2d 1215 (S.D. Cal. 2008) (p. 705) Facts: Myers owed over $11,000 to an automobile finance company in 2001. LHR was hired to collect the debt, and an LHR agent contacted her with threats of a lawsuit and garnishment of her wages. Myers negotiated a settlement whereby LHR accepted approximately $3,000 as complete 14 payments for the debt. Myers wire-transferred the money to LHR to satisfy the debt, and later received a letter saying the debt was paid in full. However, Myers later found out that her settled debt was still reported to the credit agencies by LHR and this adversely affected her credit rating. Despite the settlement, LHR agents continued to call Myers, threatening a lawsuit, wage garnishment, and reporting her to government authorities for tax evasion. 1. Were LHR's actions lawful under the FDCPA? LHR's actions were illegal in light of the FDCPA, which forbids collection agents from using any intimidation, harassment, or deceitful methods. 2. If LHR's actions were not lawful, what could it have done to comply with the act? When making the initial contact to learn more about the debt, LHR was required to make a validation disclosure in order to be in compliance with the act (if they hadn't done so already). As soon as the negotiated debt was fully paid off, LHR should have stopped trying to collect it and should have honestly reported this to the credit reporting companies. Additionally, LHR representatives should not have used any coercive, intimidating, or deceptive debt collection methods.
Discover more documents: Sign up today!
Unlock a world of knowledge! Explore tailored content for a richer learning experience. Here's what you'll get:
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help