ATH-320-7-2 Final Project Part II Submission_ Cultural Press Conference Script

.docx

School

Southern New Hampshire University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

ATH-320

Subject

Anthropology

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by DoctorMantis2450

Raven DeJesus ATH-320 7-2 Final Project Part II Submission: Cultural Press Conference Script I: Discuss The resolution of collaborating with towns folks and local governments is culturally sensitive and research-informed because they can provide historical information to help with dig sites and they can help with research. “Archaeologists can learn about the history, traditions, and cultures of people who lived in a specific area by working with descendant populations.”( [Solved] What Is the Value of Collaboration in Archaeology? Is Working With. . . | CliffsNotes , 2023). Collaborating with previous landowners is research-informed and culturally sensitive because it can encourage land stewardship and avoid conflict with locals. Collaborating with previous landowners “can help archaeologists develop strategies to protect archaeological sites on private land.”(Wright, 2015). Working with private universities is research-informed and culturally sensitive because we can view intercultural interactions as a chance to learn. By collaborating with private universities, students and staff can recognize the value and integrity of all cultures. Collaborating with state governments is research-informed and culturally sensitive because it gives communities more control over the archaeological process, decolonizing archeology. By collaborating with the state government, we can consider the opinions of tribes and nhos. Collaborating with local Native American groups is research-informed and culturally sensitive because we can build relationships with local tribes, developing respectful relationships that can

be beneficial. This collaboration can promote “respect and honor of tribal sovereignty, cultural traditions, and diversity.”( Collaborating With Indigenous People , n.d.). II: Ownership Of Culture When looking at an overall view, culture and history cannot truly be owned. Culture is defined as socially transmitted or learned behaviors. However, in this particular scenario, cultural ownership should go to local Native American groups. This specific group has its roots in Virginia for thousands of years, which makes the archaeological sites their heritage that would be excavated. Ownership Of The Past Once more, when looking at the overall view, no one can own the past. The past is just a collection of moments and events that have occurred until now. History, its artifacts, and its recordings are interpreted to be significant. History is forever changing as new information and facts are discovered. In reference to the scenario, the artifacts of the past that were excavated, like burial mounds, stone tools, and bodies, can be owned by local Native American groups because they're culturally relevant to their people. Final Resolution The difference between ownership of the past and ownership of culture is that ownership of the past “is about determining who owns the past, which is everything that has ever happened.” Meanwhile, ownership of culture is the ownership of cultural items specific to a

group of people who may have inhabited the land in the past. III: Future Generations My decision on the outcome can affect different cultural groups because people in specific groups get paid for sharing information and knowledge of their traditions and beliefs. This can allow cultural groups to have steady jobs and money. From a religious perspective, it enables them to share their beliefs and educate the public on their traditions and faith. From a social standpoint reduces animosity and hatred as people learn about their culture. The resolution promotes cultural diversity and encourages communication, which can reduce conflict as people tend to fear what they don't understand. Another way that my resolution can impact generations because the information found at the sites can change or add to their specific cultural traditions. “ By working with the descendants' population, archaeologists can learn about the history, traditions, and cultures of the people who lived in a specific region or sight. This can help archaeologists share the past instead of imposing their version.”( [Solved] What Is the Value of Collaboration in Archaeology? Is Working With. . . | CliffsNotes , 2023). Essentially, archeologists and future generations would get closer to more accurate facts about events and cultures instead of inaccurate opinions. IV: Archaeological Site Impact Previous owners would be less affected by the future archaeological site because, in the end, they sold their land and, therefore, forfeited their rights to any discoveries. But they may be

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version