McMaster University
ANTHROP 3FA3
Department of Anthropology
Fall 2023
along its length, with a rounder cross-section. The trochlear notch is a distinctive U-
shaped notch located at the proximal end of the ulna. PART B: ETHICS AND PROFESSIONALIZATION Below are two scenarios. Think about the ethical and professional components of each scenario. Identify whether there are issues with ethical practices, professional demeanour, or both. Justify your answers in the space indicated. (4 marks each)
5) A forensic scientist and their colleague loudly chat about the details and results of an on-going case during their morning commute on the bus. One mentions not taking detailed notes of their work and jokes, “Protocol? I don’t know her.” (8 lines max.)
1)
Ethical “Confidentiality”, this behavior violates the principle of confidentiality, which is crucial in forensic science to protect sensitive information and maintain the integrity of the investigation. It could potentially compromise the case and breach ethical standards. 2) Lack of professionalism by disregarding protocols, not taking detailed notes, and joking about disregarding protocol demonstrates a lack of professional ethics. Proper documentation and adherence to protocols are
fundamental principles in forensic science.
6) When asked to explain a specific methodology while on the stand in court, a forensic anthropologist scoffs and says, “That is too complex to describe simply – all you need
to know is that the victim grew up in Northern British Columbia.” (8 lines max.)
Ethical issue: Lack of transparency, in court, it is essential to provide clear and accurate explanations of methodologies and evidence in an understandable way for lay people to
ensure fairness and the pursuit of truth. This inadequate explanation doing harm to investigation by mispresenting the evidence. Professional Demeanor Issue:
Failure to Communicate Effectively, They should be able to convey complex scientific information in a manner understandable to non-experts like judges and jurors. Additionally, their disrespectful and dismissive attitude towards the court's request for an explanation is unprofessional and damages their credibility.
Grade: /30
