Assessment Matrix

.docx

School

Grand Canyon University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

672

Subject

Arts Humanities

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

4

Uploaded by JudgeValor2585

Report
1 Assessment Matrix Brian Fazio Colleges of Humanities and Social Sciences, Grand Canyon University PCN 672 Childhood and Adolescent Trauma Dr. C. Murphy November 29, 2023
2 Assessment Matrix Name and Purpose of Assessment Compare Assessments (Include ethical usage, consent, and when you would use it) (50-100 words each) Analyze Appropriateness, Reliability, and Validity Assessment 1: Vanderbilt Assessment Scale Screen: This tool is used to diagnose ADHD in children between ages 6-12. The scale assesses inattention and hyperactivity along with anxiety, depression, ODD, academic issues and conduct disorder (Wolraich, 2003). The assessment has two versions one given by a teacher and another version given by the parents. The ethical use of this mostly presents no problems, but when multiple agencies are involved, the minimal amount of information needed should be shared (Foreman, 2005). If data and information is going to be used in a study, must let client/patient know data will be included but it will not have identifiable marks ("Aca Code of Ethics," 2006). A medical professional who is permitted to diagnose ADHD should review results. ADHD has three main types: 1) Combined (90.2) 2) Predominantly Inattentive (90.0) 3) Predominantly Hyperactive/Impulse (90.1) (Association, 2022) Reliability-between .91 and . 94 Validity- r=.79 (Wolraich, 2003) Age Appropriateness: This assessment is given to children ages 6-12. Assessment 2: Child Trauma Screen (CTS) This is a brief assessment for children ages 6-17 that suffer from PTE and/or PTSD (Lang & Connell, 2017). The assessment can be used by either clinical or non- clinical individuals. The setting can be any which includes a child. The assessment can be either self- report or interview style (Lang & Connell, 2017). If data and information is going Validity- .97 (parental) and . 90 (child) Reliability -.82 (parental) and .78 (child) (Lang & Connell, 2017)
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help