Bio 527
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
San Diego State University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
549
Subject
Biology
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
27
Uploaded by JudgePower6511
Bio 527: Animal Behavior Exam 2 Study Guide Optimality modeling Terminology Despotic distribution: helps explain the distribution of animals within their habitats based on competition for limited resources and individual competitive abilities
.
Ideal free distribution: this theory explains how the organisms are going to distribute themselves among sites so that the payoff is going to be the same at each of those sites Diminishing returns:
Diminishing returns in animal behavior refer to the principle that as an animal continues to forage or exploit a resource, the rate
of gain or benefit from that resource decreases over time. It represents the idea that the longer an animal spends in a specific foraging patch, the less it gains per unit of time, as the most accessible or valuable resources are depleted.
Giving-up time: Giving-up time in animal behavior refers to the point at which an animal decides to leave a particular foraging patch or habitat and move on to another. It is the moment when the animal perceives that the costs or risks of foraging in that location (e.g., exposure to predators) exceed
the benefits or resources gained.
Frequency-dependent strategies: Frequency-dependent strategies in animal behavior refer to behaviors or tactics adopted by individuals based on the relative frequencies of alternative strategies in a population. An individual's success in using a particular strategy depends on how common or rare that strategy is within the population. These strategies can be advantageous when they are less common and disadvantageous when they become more common in the population.
Conditional strategies: Conditional strategies in animal behavior refer to behaviors or tactics that individuals adopt based on their specific circumstances, characteristics, or environmental conditions. Rather than having a fixed, one-size-fits-all strategy, animals adjust their behavior based on factors such as their age, size, health, or the availability of resources in their environment.
Game theory: game theory uses models to predict phenomena that get at their causes
ESS (evolutionarily stable strategy): predictions about which social behaviors
will be stable over evolutionary time. A set of behaviors that is resistant to invasion by any other strategies if everyone’s already doing the ESS
Hawk-Dove strategies: classic model with two contestants. The hawk always escalates to fight: dove only displays V= value of resource C= cost of injury Both contestants have equal change of winning when playing the same strategy Example: Hawk-Dove Models
• Classic model with two contestants
– Hawk always escalates to fight; Dove only displays
• V = value of resource; C = cost of injury
• If both contestants have equal chance of winning, then:
Hawk Dove Hawk (1⁄2)(V-C) V
Dove 0 V/2 – What is the ESS?
• Strategy is an ESS when it cannot be invaded
– Is Dove Strategy ever an ESS? • No! (only when V/2 > V, i.e., V is negative)
– Is Hawk Strategy ever an ESS? • YES, when (1/2)(V-C) > 0 (i.e., V > C)
– What happens when C > V (injury very costly)?
Concepts What are the general differences between animals that follow a more “despotic” model of territoriality, and those that favor more of an ideal free distribution?
Despotic Distribution: In this model, some individuals control and defend the best territories, leading to unequal resource distribution. Dominant individuals have preferential access to resources.
Ideal Free Distribution: This theory predicts that individuals distribute themselves among sites so that the payoff (resources) is the same at each site. Individuals can choose habitats that match their competitive abilities.
How does the leaf aphid example illustrate aspects of both?
This example illustrates aspects of both models. Some aphids distribute themselves across leaves in an ideal free manner, while others might occupy
certain leaves and defend them, following a more despotic strategy.
How would you graphically represent the ideal free distribution? It's typically represented with a graph showing resource distribution across sites. In an ideal free distribution, the resources at each site are roughly equal.
Why is the reproductive success of individuals in different quality habitats generally equal if they conform to an ideal free distribution?
In an ideal free distribution, the reproductive success of individuals in different quality habitats is generally equal because individuals move to habitats where resources are more abundant, which balances the payoff.
What types of assumptions go into the creation of an optimal foraging model?
Assumptions include knowledge of resource distribution, energy maximization, and time constraints.
How would an animal behaving in accordance with the optimal giving-up time model change its behavior in response to changes in the parameters of the model? Animals change their foraging behavior in response to changes in resource availability. As resources become scarcer, animals should spend more time foraging in the same patch.
How was the class bead game used to illustrate the principles of the optimal giving-up time model?
it's used to illustrate the principles of the optimal giving-up time model by simulating foraging decisions in a controlled environment.
Why does the giving up time model apply to starlings, but not to honeybees?
It applies to starlings because they adjust their patch residence time based on resource density, but not to honeybees because they have a different foraging strategy.
Why are optimal foraging models often constructed iteratively, after field data has been collected?
They can persist in a population due to individual variation, spatial heterogeneity, or frequency-dependent selection.
How does the oystercatcher example illustrate that process? What are some ways that alternative foraging strategies persist in the same population? How do predators or parasites affect optimal foraging decisions?
When examining a payoff matrix how would you determine whether a given strategy is an ESS? To determine if a strategy is an Evolutionarily Stable Strategy (ESS) in a payoff matrix, you would typically look for a strategy that cannot be invaded by any alternative strategy. In other words, if a population is primarily composed of individuals using the ESS, no rare mutant strategy should be able to invade and replace the ESS.
What is the logic behind the payoff structure in the hawk-dove game?
The logic is that hawks are more aggressive and may win the resource but incur a cost, while doves avoid conflict but may get a reduced share of the resource when faced with hawks.
In the hawk-dove game, the logic behind the payoff structure is that it represents the relative costs and benefits of engaging in aggressive behaviors (hawk) versus avoiding conflict and displaying a submissive behavior (dove).
Under what conditions is there no pure ESS in the hawk-dove game?
There is no pure Evolutionarily Stable Strategy (ESS) in the hawk-dove game under the following condition:
When the cost of engaging in conflict (C) is less than the potential gain from winning the resource (R). In other words, if C < R, it is not stable for all
individuals to choose the dove strategy because hawks can benefit by challenging doves.
How do you find the stable proportion of strategies in a game with no pure ESS?
To find the stable proportion of strategies in a game with no pure ESS, you would typically look for a mixed strategy equilibrium. In a mixed strategy equilibrium, individuals in the population adopt a combination of strategies, and no single strategy can dominate the population.
The proportions of strategies in the mixed equilibrium can be determined by analyzing the payoff matrix and considering factors like the relative payoffs of each strategy and the frequency of interactions between different strategy
types. Game theory techniques, such as the replicator dynamics, can be used to find the stable proportions of strategies in mixed equilibria.
What principle does the addition of the “defender” strategy illustrate in the Hawk-Dove game? The addition of the "defender" strategy in the Hawk-Dove game illustrates the principle of coexistence and stability of multiple strategies in a population. It shows that, in certain situations,
adding a new strategy can contribute to the persistence and stability of the overall population, even when there is no pure ESS.
The "defender" strategy acts as a mediator that reduces conflict between hawks and doves, promoting coexistence by preventing overly aggressive interactions. This principle of coexistence and the introduction of alternative strategies can lead to more stable and diverse populations in nature.
Predator-Prey Terminology Parasitoid Constitutive defense
Inducible defense
Renunciation, Inactivation, Circumvention, Utilization Stabilamenta
Aggressive mimicry
Crypsis
Batesian mimicry: A harmless organism mimics the appearance of a dangerous or unpalatable species.
Mullerian mimicry: Two or more harmful or unpalatable species evolve similar
warning signals.
Aposematism: Warning coloration or signals that indicate the unpalatability or danger of an organism.
Unprofitability advertisement: Signaling that communicates an organism's unprofitability as prey.
Pursuit-deterrent signal: Signals that discourage predators from pursuing prey.
Dilution effect
Selfish herd
Confusion effect
Coevolution
Arms race
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Related Questions
Bayesian updating can be a useful tool for thinking about the development of behavior. Imagine the following scenario with respect to an animal’s knowledge of the average density of food in patches in their environment. Which of the following is the most accurate interpretation of this Bayesian view of this animal?
Their environment is much richer in food resources than expected
Their confidence in their assessment of the state of the environment is greater after they go out and sample the world
Their environment is less rich than expected – perhaps there is a drought that has caused a crash in food availability relative to historical conditions
All of the above
arrow_forward
What is the best description of the original Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model? Nis
prey, P is predator. a is rate of consumption, f is conversion of prey to predator, and
q is the mortality rate of the predator.
dP
rN - aNP=
= faNP - qP
dt
dt
Type 1 functional response with density-dependent prey and density-
independent predator
Type 1 functional response with density-independent prey and density-
independent predator
Type 1 functional response with density-dependent prey and density-dependent
predator
Type 1 functional response with density-independent prey and density-
dependent predator
arrow_forward
Note a particular animal behaviour at the Central Experimental Farm in Ottawa, (eg. chickens, cows, horses, sheep) on at least four (4) different occasions, taking note of the animal’s targeting (observed) behaviour, as well as any other competing or associated behaviours that may have an impact on that animal’s decision-making processes while under your observation. Your total observation time over the 4 periods must add up to at least 2 hours of data.
Keep a log of these observations and also do a 1-page report attempting to describe the adaptive value of the behaviour that you observed.
For clarification, the adaptive value is a measure of the evolutionary impacts of a behaviour, i.e. the ultimate function of a behaviour (what purpose it serves) in order to maximize fitness (survival and/or reproduction).
IMPORTANTShould include:1) Field notes2) 1-page report on adaptive value
Data gathering and note collection
Ensure that notes are well organized and clear. A strong focus on the…
arrow_forward
Note a particular animal behaviour at the Central Experimental Farm in Ottawa, (eg. chickens, cows, horses, sheep) on at least four (4) different occasions, taking note of the animal’s targeting (observed) behaviour, as well as any other competing or associated behaviours that may have an impact on that animal’s decision-making processes while under your observation. Your total observation time over the 4 periods must add up to at least 2 hours of data.
Keep a log of these observations.
Ensure that notes are well organized and clear. A strong focus on the adaptive value, while keeping track of other events and behaviours. Good record keeping of dates, times and conditions.
arrow_forward
Please create a very detailed experiment regarding the following ultimate hypotheiss about meerkats behavior but withan assumption that there are unlimited resources.
arrow_forward
One of the main objectives of BI308 is to learn to think scientifically about animal behaviour. I talked about the problems that arise when we tell fables or just-so stories about the things that animals do. Some of the tools and approaches behavioural ecologists use would seem to be designed to help us be scientifically rigorous in our conclusions. But are they perfect? Think about optimality modeling. Could it be misused, leading to the kind of unscientific stories we were hoping to avoid or other misconceptions? Explain your reasoning
arrow_forward
. Simulations 4-6 had lower density of birds (more spacing), how did this influence their ability to escape predation? With more spacing, which number of Junco’s was most advantageous (4, 8, and 16)? Ecologically explain this result.
If this flock of birds occurred in an area with low food availability what flock density would you predict? Explain how food availability impacts flock size/competition.
Was there a relationship between prop. Vigilance (proportion of birds looking up right before Hawk attack) and the rate at which they escaped predation?
Was there a relationship between Mean vigilance (average number of birds looking up each tick) and the rate at which the Junco’s the escaped predation? Was there a relationship between Mean vigilance and the number of birds in the flock?
arrow_forward
Note a cow animal behaviour at the Central Experimental Farm in Ottawa on at least four (4) different occasions, taking note of the animal’s targeting (observed) behaviour, as well as any other competing or associated behaviours that may have an impact on that animal’s decision-making processes while under your observation. Your total observation time over the 4 periods must add up to at least 2 hours of data.
Keep a log of these observations.
Ensure that notes are well organized and clear. A strong focus on the adaptive value, while keeping track of other events and behaviours. Good record keeping of dates, times and conditions.
arrow_forward
Note a horse animal behaviour at the Central Experimental Farm in Ottawa on at least four (4) different occasions, taking note of the animal’s targeting (observed) behaviour, as well as any other competing or associated behaviours that may have an impact on that animal’s decision-making processes while under your observation. Your total observation time over the 4 periods must add up to at least 2 hours of data.
Keep a log of these observations.
Ensure that notes are well organized and clear. A strong focus on the adaptive value, while keeping track of other events and behaviours. Good record keeping of dates, times and conditions.
arrow_forward
Systems Assessment
Take a few moments and think about one clients with whom you have interacted in the last week with a language barrier to access resources. Using Bronfrennbrener’s Ecological Systems Theory:
1, Identify two to three examples for each system that may impact that client.
2, Identify one or two systems that are currently having the greatest impact on the client, and explain why.
arrow_forward
5) According to the optimal foraging theory, which of the following is NOT one of the factors that influence the likelihood of a predator's selecting a prey type?
Question 5 options:
search time required to find alternative prey types
profitability of the prey type
handling time
energy content
probability of their own predation
arrow_forward
8.
arrow_forward
Please help??ASAP
arrow_forward
During mating season, males of certain species will perform displays of aggression toward other males when approached while they are courting a female. This type of behavior is an example of
altruistic behavior
agonistic behavior
fixed action pattern
polygamous behavior
predatory behavior
The capacity to make changes in behavior on the basis of experience is known as
a fixed action.
learning.
habituation.
conditioning.
Which of the following statements is not true concerning the optimal foraging theory?
forager tries to maximize the energy gained
forager tries to minimize the energy expended
forager secures essential nutrients
forager tries to minimize the risk of getting eaten while gathering food
forager contributes to the growth of its population by gathering food
arrow_forward
Thinking about the Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model, what effect should an
increase in searching efficiency (a) have on the maximum prey population?
Increase
Decreasė
No change
< Previnus
V Finish
arrow_forward
Optimal foraging theory can make predictions about an animal’s food choice. Which of the following is the most accurate statement about optimal diet breadth as resource quality, handling time and distribution changes?
As handling time increases, animals should specialize
As the distance between resources increases, animals should generalize
As the energy content of the resources increases, animals should generalize
As the distance between patches increases, animals should stay longer in a patch
The following diagrams show four distribution patterns of resources. Each circle represents one unit of a resource, say, a food item. For which of these distributions would the Marginal Value Theorem be useful for making predictions about optimal foraging behavior. (Shown in image)
arrow_forward
Interpret the patterns of following 2 graphs?
The time taken on y axis are in seconds and
1 day = 60 sec
arrow_forward
Sit and wait vs active foraging cost and benefit
Write at least 3 cost and benefit for at least
arrow_forward
Thinking Critically
In what ways can members of the same population compete with one another? How might members of different populations compete? Contrast the results of these kinds of competition.
arrow_forward
Quèstion 36
Which behavior is optimal for an organism using risk-sensitive foraging?
decreased time feeding when the number of predators increases
increased time spent searching for food at longer distances
decreased feeding as the number of predators decreases
feeding from a central supply of food or water
arrow_forward
Please help me with this question within an hour?????
arrow_forward
Briefly explain 3 adaptive responses that an organism might show to minimize the negative effects of competition. These responses might be regulatory, evolutionary, or anything else that is ecologically relevant.
arrow_forward
Which of the following habitat cues is LEAST likely to factor into how the “landscape of fear and disgust” influences habitat choice?
Presence of carcasses
High density of conspecific excreta (poop!)
Presence of vegetative cover
Frequency of territorial singing from conspecific males
Bayesian updating can be a useful tool for thinking about the development of behavior. Imagine the following scenario with respect to an animal’s knowledge of the average density of food in patches in their environment. Which of the following is the most accurate interpretation of this Bayesian view of this animal? (shown in image)
Their environment is much richer in food resources than expected
Their confidence in their assessment of the state of the environment is greater after they go out and sample the world
Their environment is less rich than expected – perhaps there is a drought that has caused a crash in food availability relative to historical conditions
All of the above
arrow_forward
interpret the following graph:
In the graph, the number of days are 18.. 1 day is equal to 60 sec. days are taken on x-axis. The mean foraging times are taken on y-axis.
arrow_forward
There are three chief ideas of the handicap principle: 1) Animals communicate with éach other throughn sigi
must be honest, and 3) honest signals are expensive. Stotting behavior (up and down jumps gazelles exhibit when they spot a
predator before the gazelle runs away) often results in the predator leaving before it attacks, presumably because the predator
knows it won't easily catch that gazelle. This clearly is an example of the handicap principle based on the three ideas.
True
False
arrow_forward
A Gelada baboon gives a warning cry that a predator is approaching so other members of its population could run away. This behavior is an example of
innate behavior.
survival of the fittest.
altruistic behavior.
dominant hierarchical behavior.
imprinted behavior.
A stickleback fish will attack a fish model as long as the model has red coloring. What term best applies to this behavior?
Fixed Action Pattern
habituation
imprinting
associative learning
problem solving
Which of the following is least related to the others?
fighting over a mate
territorial behavior
Dominance heirarchy
cognitive maps
agonistic behavior
arrow_forward
Great white sharks prefer marine mammals like seals but can eat a number of other prey items, including birds and fish. According to the table below, what is the critical search time for seals, above which great white sharks should choose to eat an albatross if they encounter one?
Prey item: seal (energy = 60 Mcals, handling time = 5 minutes)
Prey item: albatross (energy = 10 Mcals, handling time = 2 minutes)
arrow_forward
Cooperative behaviour is widely found among animals. Provide the following:
1) an example of cooperative behaviour between genetically related individuals
2) an example of cooperative behaviour between unrelated individuals. For each of the examples, also describe the mechanism(s) involved in maintaining cooperative behaviours during their interactions.
arrow_forward
Which of the following is a conclusion you can make regarding Figure 17.11?
aerial
terrestrial
recruitment
100
200
300
100
200 300
100 200 300
time (ms)
0.
time (ms)
time (ms)
300
200
time (ms)
100
100
100
300
300
200
time (ms)
200
time (ms)
0-
100
200
300
100
200
300
time (ms)
time (ms)
A predator type specific calls
"alert" call
"moving animal" call
panic" call
2-
0-
300
100 200
time (ms)
100
200
300
100
200 300
time (ms)
time (ms)
B other calls
Figure 17.11 Sonograms of meerkat alarm calls. A, Aerial refers to calls given
when an aerial predator was sighted, and terrestrial refers to calls given when
a terrestrial predator was sighted. Recruitment calls prompted feeding
meerkats to mob together. B, Generic alarm calls.
OLow urgency calls are very similar to medium urgency calls.
Aerial calls are similar to terrestrial calls.
High urgency recruitment call is the loudest.
Each call is unique and conveys a specific message.
2.
2.
4.
2.
high urgency (kHz)
medium urgency (kHz)
low…
arrow_forward
The adaptive value is a measure of the evolutionary impacts of a behaviour, i.e. the ultimate function of a behaviour (what purpose it serves) in order to maximize fitness (survival and/or reproduction).
Animal behaviour of a horse at a farm: Gentle swishing of tail to ward off insects, and occasional stomping of feet.
Describe the animal’s decision-making process concerning that behaviour.
Questions:
• How much time/effort is spent on the focal behaviour relative to other behaviours (time allocated, intensity, etc.)?
• Did the behaviour change under certain environmental contexts?
Discuss the adaptive value:
• How does the focal behaviour impact fitness of the animal?
• What are the costs/benefits of the behaviour under different environmental contexts?
• Is the animal’s decision-making optimal with regards to costs/benefits?
• Relate back to previous questions
Do a great job at describing how the behaviour impacts the fitness of the animal. Discuss competing factors, such as…
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Biology (MindTap Course List)
Biology
ISBN:9781337392938
Author:Eldra Solomon, Charles Martin, Diana W. Martin, Linda R. Berg
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Related Questions
- Bayesian updating can be a useful tool for thinking about the development of behavior. Imagine the following scenario with respect to an animal’s knowledge of the average density of food in patches in their environment. Which of the following is the most accurate interpretation of this Bayesian view of this animal? Their environment is much richer in food resources than expected Their confidence in their assessment of the state of the environment is greater after they go out and sample the world Their environment is less rich than expected – perhaps there is a drought that has caused a crash in food availability relative to historical conditions All of the abovearrow_forwardWhat is the best description of the original Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model? Nis prey, P is predator. a is rate of consumption, f is conversion of prey to predator, and q is the mortality rate of the predator. dP rN - aNP= = faNP - qP dt dt Type 1 functional response with density-dependent prey and density- independent predator Type 1 functional response with density-independent prey and density- independent predator Type 1 functional response with density-dependent prey and density-dependent predator Type 1 functional response with density-independent prey and density- dependent predatorarrow_forwardNote a particular animal behaviour at the Central Experimental Farm in Ottawa, (eg. chickens, cows, horses, sheep) on at least four (4) different occasions, taking note of the animal’s targeting (observed) behaviour, as well as any other competing or associated behaviours that may have an impact on that animal’s decision-making processes while under your observation. Your total observation time over the 4 periods must add up to at least 2 hours of data. Keep a log of these observations and also do a 1-page report attempting to describe the adaptive value of the behaviour that you observed. For clarification, the adaptive value is a measure of the evolutionary impacts of a behaviour, i.e. the ultimate function of a behaviour (what purpose it serves) in order to maximize fitness (survival and/or reproduction). IMPORTANTShould include:1) Field notes2) 1-page report on adaptive value Data gathering and note collection Ensure that notes are well organized and clear. A strong focus on the…arrow_forward
- Note a particular animal behaviour at the Central Experimental Farm in Ottawa, (eg. chickens, cows, horses, sheep) on at least four (4) different occasions, taking note of the animal’s targeting (observed) behaviour, as well as any other competing or associated behaviours that may have an impact on that animal’s decision-making processes while under your observation. Your total observation time over the 4 periods must add up to at least 2 hours of data. Keep a log of these observations. Ensure that notes are well organized and clear. A strong focus on the adaptive value, while keeping track of other events and behaviours. Good record keeping of dates, times and conditions.arrow_forwardPlease create a very detailed experiment regarding the following ultimate hypotheiss about meerkats behavior but withan assumption that there are unlimited resources.arrow_forwardOne of the main objectives of BI308 is to learn to think scientifically about animal behaviour. I talked about the problems that arise when we tell fables or just-so stories about the things that animals do. Some of the tools and approaches behavioural ecologists use would seem to be designed to help us be scientifically rigorous in our conclusions. But are they perfect? Think about optimality modeling. Could it be misused, leading to the kind of unscientific stories we were hoping to avoid or other misconceptions? Explain your reasoningarrow_forward
- . Simulations 4-6 had lower density of birds (more spacing), how did this influence their ability to escape predation? With more spacing, which number of Junco’s was most advantageous (4, 8, and 16)? Ecologically explain this result. If this flock of birds occurred in an area with low food availability what flock density would you predict? Explain how food availability impacts flock size/competition. Was there a relationship between prop. Vigilance (proportion of birds looking up right before Hawk attack) and the rate at which they escaped predation? Was there a relationship between Mean vigilance (average number of birds looking up each tick) and the rate at which the Junco’s the escaped predation? Was there a relationship between Mean vigilance and the number of birds in the flock?arrow_forwardNote a cow animal behaviour at the Central Experimental Farm in Ottawa on at least four (4) different occasions, taking note of the animal’s targeting (observed) behaviour, as well as any other competing or associated behaviours that may have an impact on that animal’s decision-making processes while under your observation. Your total observation time over the 4 periods must add up to at least 2 hours of data. Keep a log of these observations. Ensure that notes are well organized and clear. A strong focus on the adaptive value, while keeping track of other events and behaviours. Good record keeping of dates, times and conditions.arrow_forwardNote a horse animal behaviour at the Central Experimental Farm in Ottawa on at least four (4) different occasions, taking note of the animal’s targeting (observed) behaviour, as well as any other competing or associated behaviours that may have an impact on that animal’s decision-making processes while under your observation. Your total observation time over the 4 periods must add up to at least 2 hours of data. Keep a log of these observations. Ensure that notes are well organized and clear. A strong focus on the adaptive value, while keeping track of other events and behaviours. Good record keeping of dates, times and conditions.arrow_forward
- Systems Assessment Take a few moments and think about one clients with whom you have interacted in the last week with a language barrier to access resources. Using Bronfrennbrener’s Ecological Systems Theory: 1, Identify two to three examples for each system that may impact that client. 2, Identify one or two systems that are currently having the greatest impact on the client, and explain why.arrow_forward5) According to the optimal foraging theory, which of the following is NOT one of the factors that influence the likelihood of a predator's selecting a prey type? Question 5 options: search time required to find alternative prey types profitability of the prey type handling time energy content probability of their own predationarrow_forward8.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Biology (MindTap Course List)BiologyISBN:9781337392938Author:Eldra Solomon, Charles Martin, Diana W. Martin, Linda R. BergPublisher:Cengage Learning
Biology (MindTap Course List)
Biology
ISBN:9781337392938
Author:Eldra Solomon, Charles Martin, Diana W. Martin, Linda R. Berg
Publisher:Cengage Learning