Lab 5_ What is the Weak Acid

pdf

School

Arizona State University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

116

Subject

Chemistry

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

pdf

Pages

11

Uploaded by BarristerFreedomKudu32

Report
Lab 5: What is the Weak Acid? Chemistry 116 Liliana Hurtado, Kate Klavon, Mia Peterson, Pam Heiken Lucas Bierscheid Wednesday, 10:00 - 11:50 am
Introduction Were important background concepts described? – titration, equivalence vs endpoint, etc. Were all relevant chemical formulas/equations or mathematical equations/relationships introduced and their relevance explained? –weak acid dissociation equation, NaOH + KHP rxn, NaOH + Weak Acid rxn, etc. Were the main goals and approach for the experiment appropriately introduced? – three main goals, 0.1 each. Were the techniques, equipment and their purpose in the investigation briefly described? – where/how standardization was used, equivalence point vs endpoint (which was detected in this case?), how was it detected, etc. In this experiment, there were several main goals that the group worked to accomplish. In this lab, the goals were to successfully complete two trials of titration, plot a titration curve and determine the equivalence and endpoint values, and to successfully identify the identity of the unknown acid the group was working with. For this lab, there are numerous significant background concepts to introduce. To begin, an important technique used in this lab is titration. This process can be described as the slow, consistent addition of one solution into another known concentration of a different solution, until the reaction is neutralized. In this instance, neutralization can be noted when the color changes permanently. Furthermore, there are several important concepts to note, including equivalence and endpoint. The equivalence point can be described as the point when the entire chemical reaction ends, or in other words, neutralizes. Whereas, the endpoint in titration is noted when the indicator changes color. Additionally, there are several chemical formulas that are relevant and were used throughout this lab. This lab revolves around the dissociation of acids, more specifically weak acids. As mentioned in the lab handout, weaker acids typically dissociate less and therefore, their reactions move forward until it reaches equilibrium. The acid dissociation constant, K a , represents the equilibrium constant for the dissociation of a weak acid. This can be found using
the equation listed below, which divides the equilibrium concentrations of the products by the reactants. ?𝑎 = [𝐴 −][𝐻3? +] ÷ [𝐻𝐴] Through plotting our titration curve, both the equivalence and half-equivalence points could be identified. These values are then used to calculate the K a of the unknown acid. We also used the molarity formula several times throughout this experiment in order to determine the identity of the weak acid. This formula is listed below. moles of NaOH/ L of NaOH = M of NaOH Procedures During part one, NaOH was standardized in order to find the molarity. Materials gathered were three 250mL beakers, a buret, a hot plate, one stir bar, NaOH, standard potassium hydrogen phthalate, and hot water. In order to start the procedure, the buret was primed three times by placing one 250mL beaker under the buret and flushing NaOH through the buret. To follow, about ~0.25g of KHP was massed and placed into a 250mL beaker with 50mL of boiled water. Once KHP was dissolved by swirling the liquid around, 2-3 drops of % phenolphthalein indicator were added. This solution was then placed on top of a hot plate then moved under the buret filled with NaOH. The stir bar was placed inside the solution and the hot plates stirrer was turned onto a medium setting. Slowly, the stopcock was opened slowly and not fully, allowing sodium hydroxide to mix with the solution. As soon as a pink color persisted within 30 seconds,
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
the endpoint was reached and the buret reading was determined. Two trials of this procedure was performed. During part two, Titration was performed by using a drop counter and a pH meter in order to create a graph that helped determine an equivalence point. A pH probe with a magnetic microstirrer, a drop counter, a 100mL beaker, 60mL of an unknown acid, a hot plate, and a reservoir/buret were gathered. 60mL of an unknown acid was placed into a 100mL beaker. The reservoir/buret was primed using the unknown acid. From here, a calibrated pH probe was attached to the drop counter and placed directly under the tip of the reservoir/buret. The beaker containing 60mL of the unknown acid was placed under the drop counter, but on top of the hot plate. The end of the pH probe with the magnetic stirrer was submerged into the solution. Starting the stirrer on the hotplate, 30mL of the titrant was then added into the plastic reservoir. The valves were slowly opened allowing the solution to drop through the drop counter and into the unknown acid solution, allowing the drop counter and the pH probe to create a graph. The data recorded was pH v.s volume. Once the endpoint was reached, which was determined by a reference graph, the procedure was concluded. Results
Were all appropriate tables or figures included for Part 1, and Part 2? Did the weak acid titration curve graph have an equivalence pt and 1/2 equivalence pt marked? Were the initial pH, volumes at eq/pt, and volumes/pH at 1/2 eq pt indicated somewhere? Was there a summary table or statement for calculated Kas with average? Was there a presentation of the identity of the acid? Did each Table/Figure have a title and number, and were appropriate significant figures and units used? (Buret measurements should be to 2 decimal places.) Did each Table/Figure include a brief text description to introduce and/or describe the contents? For Part 1: Were example calculations for each type of calculation performed using the actual experimental numbers shown? -Included but not limited to mol KHP, M NaOH, class avg NaOH. For Part 2: Were example calculations for each type of calculation performed using the actual experimental numbers shown? - M of weak acid, Ka from initial point, Ka from 1/2 eq pt, avg Ka. Was only one of each example calculation shown, including which table and trial the numbers came from? Were units shown on all numbers? Were appropriate significant figures used? Was appropriate use of the equation editor and/or electronically generated tables/figures demonstrated? KHP (g) Mol KHP V i V f ? M NaOH (mL) Total Vol ?M NaOH (mL) M NaOH Avg M Trial 1 0.252 0.00123 9.7 59.7 0.1268 M 0.13125 M Trial 2 0.269 0.00132 8.5 58.5 0.1357 7 M Calculation 1: Moles of KHP Equation: ___ g KHP ___ mol NaOH × 1 ?𝑜? ?𝐻? 204.23 ? ?𝐻? × 1 ?𝑜? ?𝑎?𝐻 1 ?𝑜? ?𝐻? = Trial 1: 0.252 g KHP 0.00123 mol NaOH × 1 ?𝑜? ?𝐻? 204.23 ? ?𝐻? × 1 ?𝑜? ?𝑎?𝐻 1 ?𝑜? ?𝐻? = Calculation 2: Molarity of NaOH
Equation: ?𝑜??𝑠 ?𝑎?𝐻 ? ?𝑎?𝐻 = ? 𝑜? ?𝑎?𝐻 Trial 1: = 0.1268 M of NaOH 0.00123 ?𝑜? ?𝑎?𝐻 .0097 ? ?𝑎?𝐻 Graph 1: Values for weak acid titration
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Half equivalence point = 6.23 pH Equivalence point = 12.35 pH pH Volume (mL) Half-Equivalence Point 6.23 23.452 mL Equivalence Point 12.35 33.750 mL Calculation 3: Molarity of Weak Acid Moles of Weak Acid = 33.750 mL = 0.0415125 mol × 1? 1000 ?? × 0.00123 ?𝑜? ?𝑎?𝐻 1 ? Molarity of Weak Acid = 0.695355 M Weak Acid 0.0415125 ?𝑜? ??𝑎? 𝑎?𝑖? 0.0597 ? = Calculation 4: K a of Weak Acid
K a of Half-Equivalence Point: K a = 10 -pH of half equivalence point K a = 10 -6.23 = 5.88 x 10 -7 K a of Equivalence Point: ICE Table HA (aq) H 2 O (l) H 3 O + (aq) A - (aq) I 0.695355 M NA 0 M 0 M C -x NA + x + x E 0.695355 - x NA x x Plug in values to the K a expression: K a = [? 2 ] 0.695355 ? Find x using: x = [H 3 O + ] = 10 -3.872 = 0.001342 Plug in x to find K a → K a = ( 0.001342 ) 2 / 0.695355 M = 2.58 x 10 -6 Closest K a value to acetic acid = 1.8 x 10 -5 Discussion Was there sufficient discussion of each of the results presented in the Results section? Did the discussion address how the main goals of the lab were related to the results obtained? For Part 1, was there sufficient analysis of the data presented in the Results section? -- the purpose/results of the standardization (class data and/or individual data)? / molarity of NaOH from standardization seems reasonable? Why/Why not? Etc. For Part 2, was there sufficient discussion of the titration curve? -- whether the molarity of weak acid calculated seems reasonable? Why/Why not? / what the pH at eq pt is and its significance / based on Ka calculated, what is identity and what is rationale for choosing it? Etc. Were the specific sources of error discussed in detail, including how they may have affected the result? Were specific sources of error used (avoiding vague excuses like “human error”)? Was there a discussion on how to reduce or eliminate these sources of error? If applicable (perhaps referring to statistical analysis/% error/ etc. from Results), was there a discussion of what might be the cause of any errors and what could be done differently to improve the results? In lab 5, our group utilized titration in order to determine the unknown weak acid. The experiment had two parts, where the first part utilized phenolphethalein to indicate the equivalence point of NaOH through stoichiomentric calculations. The second part consisted of
utlizing a drop counter and pH meter to more accurately determine the equivalence point. A titration curve was made using the graphical analysis app. The first part of the lab’s results showed that 0.00128 moles of NaOH were required to reach the equivalence point, which was then converted to a concentration of 59.1 M of NaOH. In the second part of the lab the acid dissociation constant (K a ) and molarity were calculated of the weak acid. The second part of the lab consisted of calculating K a of the weak acid, which was 2.58 x 10 -6 The calculations showed that the K a that most closely matched the K a calculated was acetic acid. Thae lab sucesscully demonstrated titration as a tool to identify the unknown acid, and allowed the lab group members to use a drop counter for the first time, along with practicing their pH meter skills. The places for error included human error, but also technological error as priming the pH meter and connecting it to a phone was a difficult process that could have skewed the results. In the future to decrease error, a more accurate reading could be found by making sure the pH meter was properly calibrated to the most accurate measurement possible. The percent error was 83%, which is not ideal but since the numbers are very small it is somewhat within reason. Conclusion Were the goals of the experiment briefly restated? Was the final result of the lab given and final conclusions drawn about the validity of the result(s) and the success of the experiment? Were the objectives mentioned in the introduction achieved? If not, were modifications to the experimental process suggested to improve it? Was the experiment related to outside research conducted or future work that could be done; i.e, how are scientists using (or could use) these techniques in their experiments? or How can these techniques help in current or future field research?
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
The goal of this experiment in part 1 was to find the standardization of NaOH. The end results were 0.252 g of KHP used in trial 1 and 0.269g in trial 2. This is 0.00123 and 0.00132 moles. From there we used the amount of liters to get the standardization of NaOH, 0.13125 M. For part 2, the goal was to determine what the unknown acid was. We did this using titration. We had to figure out the pH and the half equivalence point of the acid, and calculate Ka in order to determine the unknown acid. The half equivalence point was 23.452 mL with a pH of 6.23. The equivalence point was 33.75 mL, with a pH of 12.35. We used this information to find the moles of the weak acid, 0.0415125 mol. Then we found the molarity, 0.695355 M Weak Acid. We used this to calculate Ka, 2.58 x 10^-6 at the equivalence point. This means our acid was most likely acetic acid. Acetic acid has a Ka of 1.8 x 10^-5, which is close to our results, validating our experiment. Titration is used outside of a lab for things like product development and quality control. It can be used to determine the acidity of a fruit, or the amount of vitamin C in orange juice, (Smith). It is also used in the water industry to test the chemical content and pH of water, (Bell-Young). References Were the handout and other appropriate resources listed? Was at least one extra source for the useful real-life situation included? Were references in ACS format? If needed, was in-text citation used appropriately? Bell-Young, Lucy. “What Is Titration Used for in Real Life? - The Chemistry Blog.” ReAgent Chemical Services , 20 Oct. 2021, www.chemicals.co.uk/blog/what-is-titration-used-for-in-real-life. Smith, Rachael. “What Is Titration: Food Testing Equipment.” Calibre Control , Calibre Control, 23 May 2022, www.calibrecontrol.com/news-blog/2022/5/23/what-is-titration#:~:text=It%20is%20used%20exten sively%20in,content%20in%20different%20food%20products.