Social Injustice and Cultural Identifiers Research Rough Draft

In recent years, the Internet has become a vital medium for the free exchange of ideas. The spread of hate speech is facilitated by numerous individuals and organizations using social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. In online discussion groups, should free speech remain untamed? Should there be a zero-tolerance policy for hate speech on social media?

Ethical Issue #1: Artificial Intelligence – The National Society of Professional Engineers Code of Ethics states that the services provided by engineers require honesty, impartiality, fairness, and equity, and must be dedicated to the protection of public health, safety, and welfare. In addition, engineers must perform under a standard of professional behavior that requires adherence to the highest principles of ethical conduct. The emergence of artificial intelligence will have an enormous impact on society, including on such issues as employment, inequality, human behavior, and security. How will artificial intelligence influence the work performed by professional engineers in the years ahead?

According to many, the digital world is being divided into ‘haves’ and ‘have nots’ – between those that have access and can use a computer and the Internet, and those that do not have such access. Some believe that this creates serious ethical implications and that there is a moral obligation to do something about the disparity; the ‘have nots’ may well feel discriminated against or feel ‘socially excluded’ and are missing out on many life opportunities. Do you feel that everyone everywhere should have access to computers and the Internet, regardless of location, need, competency, or ability to pay? If yes, who should provide the services and education and who should pick up the tab? If no, explain why not everyone needs access to the Internet.

The Internet has become a significant medium for exercising one's right to free speech. Numerous individuals and organizations use Facebook and Twitter to propagate hate speech. Should there be no restrictions on expression in online discussion forums? How far should restrictions on hate speech on social media go?

In today’s technologically advanced society, is there really privacy? Based on your own personal experiences with social media (Facebook, Twitter, Tik Tok, Instagram, or Snapchat), do you feel that individuals should be held accountable for their actions outside of the workplace? Is it possible that, due to the technological advances in smart phones, tablets, and other communication devices, workplace and personal privacy have meshed together to a point that what was once personal space is now fair game in the hiring and firing practices?

Many people believe that the digital world is separated between 'haves' and 'have nots' — those who have access to and can use a computer and the Internet, and others who do not. Some argue that this has major ethical consequences and that there is a moral need to address the discrepancy; the 'have nots' may feel discriminated against or'socially excluded,' and are missing out on numerous life possibilities. Do you believe that everyone, regardless of location, need, competency, or financial ability, should have access to computers and the Internet? If this is the case, who should supply the services and education, and who should foot the bill? If not, please explain why not everyone need access to the internet

The widespread availability of mobile phones now provides enormous convenience, but may its abuse lead to the loss of this benefit? Mobile phones are banned in many classrooms due to the distraction of constant texting and the use of the phone by dishonest students to cheat on exams; similarly, camera phones are now banned in many fitness centers, park restrooms, and other similar facilities because some people have used them inappropriately to take compromising photos. What do you think about these responses to cell phone abuse? Is universally prohibiting cell phone use the only solution, or are there alternative methods to assure responsible usage? Should individuals who exploit technology in a dishonest or immoral way face harsher penalties? .

Technological advancement is allowing individuals to take a vacation from their moral obligations and undermine our society's foundational beliefs.

The use of the internet as a platform for exercising one's right to free speech is becoming more widespread as time goes on. Facebook and Twitter are being used by a lot of different persons and groups to disseminate hate speech. Should there be no restrictions placed on free speech on the internet, considering the medium? Should hate speech be restricted on social media platforms?

The Internet is becoming a vital tool for exercising one's right to free expression. Facebook and Twitter have become popular vehicles for the dissemination of extremist propaganda by both individuals and groups. The question is whether or not there should be no limits placed for expression in the digital sphere. To what extent should hate speech be suppressed on social media?

Describe the ways in which the development of technology is weakening the principles that drive our society and enabling people to take a vacation from the moral duties that they have, and then identify and explain the particular ways in which this is occurring. Describe the ways in which the development of technology is weakening the ideals that drive our society and allowing individuals to take a vacation from the moral obligations that they have.

Internet access is now required for exercising one's right to free expression. A vast number of individuals and groups use social media to disseminate hate speech. Should limitations be placed on online free speech? How can internet platforms prevent the posting of abusive comments?

Answers only please no need for explanation. Thanks 1. Behavior Modification is the applied science and professional practice concerned with analyzing and modifying human behavior True /False 2. Which are the following characteristics of behavior (choose all that apply) 1.Involves an individual's actions not labels 2.Involves measurable dimensions (frequency , duration , intensity latency ) 3.Can be observed , described , and recorded 4.Has an impact on the environment ( physical or social ) 3. Concerning the historical roots of Behavior Modification, which historical event is associated with 1930' * s - 40' * s ? A.Skinner Science and Human Behavior B.Association for Behavior Analysis C.Skinner - Basic research on behavioral principles D.Pavlov Conditioned Reflexes 4. Which of the following is NOT an area of application for behavior modification according to your chapter 1 content ? A.Social media posts B.Community psychology C.Child behavior management D.Business , industry ,…

The use of the Internet has become indispensable for exercising one's right to free speech. Hate speech is spread over social media by a large number of people and organizations. Should there be restrictions on free speech online? How can online platforms ensure that hateful remarks are not posted?

The use of the internet has become necessary for exercising one's right to free speech. Hate speech is spread over social media by a large number of people and organizations. Should there be restrictions on free speech online? How can online platforms ensure that hateful remarks are not posted?

The Internet has rapidly emerged as one of the most popular platforms for exercising one's right to free expression, and this trend is expected to continue. Facebook and Twitter are both being used by a large number of individuals and groups to disseminate hate speech. Given the nature of the medium, should the internet provide unrestricted free speech? Should there be limits placed on hate speech on social media?

The Internet has grown in prominence as a platform for unrestricted discourse. Both individuals and groups often use social networking sites like Twitter and Facebook to disseminate hateful messages. Should there be no limits on expression on the internet, considering its medium? When it comes to online platforms, should hate speech be regulated?