presentation script

.pdf

School

Binghamton University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

389C

Subject

Economics

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

4

Uploaded by adestcham

presentation title: Rational choice theory in "big brother" Rational choice theory: Famous economist and philosopher Adam Smith believed that human beings are rational and make choices based on their own self-interests. How individuals choose to decide what will best serve them depends on their personal preferences. In today’s world, rational choice theory finds application in a variety of fields, some of which are political science, economics, and sociology. In rational choice theory are four elements: 1. Every decision is rational and involves a careful consideration of the costs and benefits 2. For an action or relationship to be pursued, the benefits must surpass the associated costs. 3. If the value of a reward decreases below the costs faced, an individual may end that action or relationship 4. Individuals will use the resources available to them to maximize their outcomes. Big Brother: “Big Brother” begins with 16 strangers moving into a house covered with cameras and microphones. Three episodes air on TV each week, and fans of the show can watch live feeds online at almost any time. On Thursday nights, the Head of Household (HOH), the most influential and powerful position in Big Brother, is determined through a competition that can be physical, mental, or a combination of both. The HOH is safe from elimination for the week as they face the responsibility of nominating two houseguests for eviction. The eviction vote takes place the following Thursday night. The nominated houseguests have a chance to save themselves by winning the Power of Veto competition. The winner can remove one nominee from the block or choose not to use the power. If the Power of Veto is used, the HOH must nominate another house guest for eviction. On Thursday night, the house guests vote to evict one of the two nominees. Each house guest has one vote, and the eviction ceremony is live. The nominees do not get a vote, and the HOH only votes in the case of a tie. This elimination process continues weekly until only two players remain. Once it gets to this point, the power shifts to the Big Brother jury, consisting of the previous nine evicted houseguests. They decide the winner of the $750,000 and the season through their votes. In the game of Big Brother, every decision made is considered to be a $750,000 decision. The houseguests are constantly faced with a plethora of decisions that will continuously shape their journey in the game. These decisions cannot be impulsive and require extremely meticulous strategic thought. This strategic decision-making encompasses a thorough consideration of short-term and long-term consequences, alliances, potential competition outcomes, and the constantly changing social hierarchy and politics within the Big Brother house.
Alliances play a huge part in the game as houseguests recognize how powerful that strength is in numbers. Individuals will deliberately align themselves with other individuals who share the same goals. The decision on whether to form or end an alliance is contingent on a number of factors like the current social climate of the house, the power distribution that specific week, alliance members' competition strength, etc. Power plays the biggest role here, as houseguests tend to align themselves with those in control and distance themselves from those on the losing side. The weekly competitions present both opportunities and challenges for the houseguests. The level and intensity of effort a houseguest chooses to put forth involves a consideration of potential risks and benefits. Houseguests of seasons past have strategically chosen when to excel in competitions and when to not. This is decided on factors such as the timing of power dynamics shifting, the need for safety, and the terrifying possibility of becoming a threat to the rest of the house, placing a target on one’s back. The houseguests must carefully choose which housemates to target for elimination during nominations and evictions. A balance between personal interests and loyalty to one’s alliance is forced to be made in this decision. During evictions, the houseguests must make extremely rational decisions by weighing their alliance loyalty and personal relationship with the game's future trajectory. This demonstrates their ability to strike a balance between how they wish the game to unfold both short-term and long-term. The game of rational choice: The contestants in Big Brother are essentially rational actors who have to make strategic decisions to guarantee their spot in the game. This strategic rationale extends to how the houseguests navigate different aspects of the game – previously mentioned on the last slide – that influence both the individual and group, whether it is alliances or the house as a whole. The houseguests have to weigh the benefits of advancing their individual game against the advantages of collective efforts in their respective alliances. Rational actors, in this case the houseguests, strategically choose when, if ever, to betray their alliances once it aligns with their self-interests. In the game of big brother, trust is extremely important and the players have to consider the advantages and disadvantages of deceit. As the players walk the narrow path between strategic betrayals and preserving necessary alliances, they must take into consideration the potential consequences in future alliances. This makes rational decision-making more important than anything else in the game. The houseguests demonstrate rational decision-making through calculated efforts to influence their fellow roommates while knowing the impact of their words and actions they choose on the social dynamics of the house and the game.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help