Final article review

.docx

School

York University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

2100

Subject

Economics

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by ChancellorLightningBeaver12

Report
Citibank, Credit Cards, and the Local Politics of National Consumer Finance, 1968–1991 Sean H. Vanatta, the author of this article, holds a Ph.D. from Princeton University. He is currently a US Economic and Social History lecturer at the University of Glasglow. Vanatta provides a perspective on the rise of consumer finance after the postwar and draws attention toward the role of state-level regulatory and financial institutes' drive to gain power over restrictive federal policies. The article starts by providing an overview of the postwar bank regulatory regime and Citibank's position in that situation. Initially, Citibank Citibank optimized the lack of international regulation and expanded its market. It actively sought opportunities to bypass the limitation of charging a maximum interest rate fixed by the state to make a profit on credit cards. Citibank found a solution to its interest rate problem in the legal precedent of Marquette, which allowed the bank to set its credit card rates and transfer the laws of South Dakota onto all Citi-card transactions across the country. This regional shift of Citibank brought economic prosperity to South Dakota, alluring other regions to lessen their restrictions on banks. Vanatta argues that although Citibank says the changes would contribute to more competition between banks, it was rather between states to make circumstances more favorable for them than consumers ( Vanatta,2015,44). Vanatta's writing style is academic and has a chronological order of events making it easy to follow. Moreover, simple writing makes it accessible to academic and non-academic audiences. The research presented in the article is extensive and well-documented, with numerous studies and sources cited to support the author's arguments ranging from academic research papers to historical context by referencing key events such as the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 and the growth of credit card usage. The author does a great job of weaving together the various strands of history, including the regulatory system, the financial conditions of banks, and the development of the credit card market. Moreover, the author tried to present an opposing point of view, which is appreciated; for instance, admitting credit cards were made more available after the changes to underserved customers (Vandatta,2015,38). Vandatta successfully conveys that Citibank was an opportunist by depicting historical events of capitalizing on international markets (Vanatta,2015,5), joining BankAmericard Inc. (NBI) after introducing Visa (Vanatta,2015,21), and moving to South Dacota (Vantta,2015,30). The author had a judgment toward banks that they only saw their benefit while ignoring the rights of Americans in the local political economy. (Vanatta,2015,45). One of the drawbacks of this article is that the author blames the banking sector's extraterritoriality for political and economic instability but fails to provide direct evidence showing its effects on the economy through any valid proof. The article merely states the events that lead to Citibank's freedom from state regulatory restrictions instead its
aftermath effect for rising consumer debt from 1980 to 2008, reaching over one trillion dollars (Vanatta,2015,42). There needs to be an in-depth analysis of policy changes' effect on consumers. Furthermore, the author is over-looking the point of view of the banks; these institutions are prone to look for opportunities, especially when they are incurring a loss on the credit cards in order to survive and provide the service it brought a positive aspect to them and the customers by making it eventually more accessible to others. The author solely blames the financial institution for instability and weakened citizenship in America's age of finance but ignores the government's ability to regulate and wrong policy responses. The article's conclusion draws attention to the political nature of financialization, highlighting the need to reassess the balance between credit access and consumer protection in the era of finance. Overall, the article provides a valuable contribution to understanding the impact of financialization on the American political and economic landscape. Overall, the article offers a thought-provoking analysis of the relationship between financial regulation and the political economy of consumer credit. However, it fails to hold Citibank's relocation accountable for the economic downturn due to insufficient direct linkage. The author failed to convince that Citibank's relocation led to the removal of interest rates and other pricing restrictions and severe economic consequences due to a lack of evidence. The article got deviated more from the history of the changes in the system rather than how the system led to the accumulation of debt.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help