3080 Essay Paper Grading Rubric F20

12/11/2020 Activities - ENGG*3080 (01) F20 - Energy Resources & Tech. - CourseLink - University of Guelph https://courselink.uoguelph.ca/d2l/common/dialogs/nonModal/blank.d2l?d2l_body_type=1&d2l_nonModalDialog_cb=d2l_cntl_24d6b5a736d64a71afe51070b2a68502_5&d2l_nonModalDialog_cbwin=24… 1/1 Total 22 / 22 Overall Score Criteria Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Level 0 Criterion Score Methods, Assumptions and Sources (4 marks) 4 / 4 Data Collection and Research (4 marks) 4 / 4 Results and Discussion (4 marks) 4 / 4 Conclusions (4 marks) 4 / 4 References (2 marks) 2 / 2 Quality of Writing and Presentation (4 marks) 4 / 4 3 points Appropriate assumptions made with some justifications. Calculations are correct. Sources are properly cited and mostly relevant to assumptions. 2 points Some basic assumptions made with limited justification. Calculations are mostly correct. Some sources cited with some relevance to assumptions. 1 point Limited or no assumptions stated without appropriate justifications. Errors or omissions in calculations. Limited use of cited sources and/or lack of relevance to assumptions. 0 points 3 points Collected data carefully to an acceptable level of accuracy. Used clear approaches to collect data with appropriate justification to support findings. 2 points Data collection is adequate within an acceptable level of accuracy. Approaches lacking some details and/or supporting justifications. 1 point Data collection is rushed / inaccurate with obvious errors. Approaches lack detail with no supporting justifications. 0 points 3 points Results are mostly reasonable, supported by calculations and discussion. Sources of error are discussed as appropriate. 2 points Results show some inconsistency, some small errors in calculations and discussion. Sources of error are stated but lack evidence. 1 point Results are inconsistent with errors and omissions. Limited discussion. Sources of error are not detailed appropriately. 0 points 3 points Formulate obvious conclusions that address findings and discuss some implications of energy consumption. Some insight is evident. 2 points Conclusions are valid but some are not based on findings from the assignment. Limited insight. 1 point Conclusions are invalid or not developed from the findings in the assignment. 0 points 1.5 points Cite some high quality references (credible, reliable) which support key points Follows proper format as stated in lab manual 1 point Cite few high quality references – most are not credible or reliable to support key points Follows proper format as stated in lab manual 0.5 points Cite few or no references – most are not credible or reliable and do not support key points; Lab manual is not cited as a reference Does not follow proper format 0 points 3 points Well written, clear, and organized, with relevant details. Information is presented acceptably in a logical manner Grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors are infrequent 2 points Writing and presentation conveys methods, information, and results, lacking some relevant details and/or somewhat difficult to interpret Grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors exist but do not severely inhibit delivery 1 point Difficult or impossible to find important information, vague or unclear statements, difficult to evaluate Grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors are starting to inhibit communication 0 points L l 4 L l 3 L l 2 L l 1 L l 0 4 points Excellent assumptions made with justifications. Calculations are correct and easy to follow. Sources include those provided and relevant external sources as needed with citations to support assumptions. 4 points Clear effort and attention to detail in data collection. Attempts to improve quality of data detailed. Used clear approaches in detailed data acquisition with justification to support findings. 4 points Results are reasonable and supported by correct calculations and detailed discussion. Sources of error are discussed in detail. 4 points Strong conclusions that summarize findings of the assignment and discuss implications when applied to societal energy consumption. Critical thinking and depth of insight evident. 2 points Cite many high quality references (credible, reliable) which clearly support key points Follows proper format as stated in lab manual 4 points Professional quality writing and presentation / editing Clear, concise and organized with all relevant details. Easy to read and evaluate. Very few grammar, punctuation, or spelling errors Close