Writing Task 2
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Concordia University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
317
Subject
English
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by MateButterflyPerson4000
Vittorio Gattola, Dariane Morin
Christine Kerr
Literature for our Time
603-BML-LA
February 24, 2021
Writing Task 2
1)
In a paragraph of around 250-300 words, compare and contrast the soldier
characters in “For Esmé — with Love and Squalor” and “A Perfect Day for Bananafish.” (10
marks)
The soldier characters in “For Esmé — with Love and Squalor” and “A Perfect Day for
Bananafish” are quite different. Even though they suffered a similar traumatic experience by
going into war, they react differently to their environment, especially
the
towards?
youth. For
example, the soldier in the short story “A Perfect Day for Bananafish” refuses to accept the
fact that children grow up and eventually bec
ame adults
,
whereas the soldier in “For Esmé”
made his peace with the fact that children evolve and do not stay naive and innocent forever.
In the short story “A Perfect Day for Bananafish
,
” we can see that the ex-soldier is still
mentally wounded from the war. To escape the reality of the adult world, he goes outside of
the hotel where he meets
Sibyl
sp!!
, a young girl. We can see that the soldier likes being
around children because he sees them as purely naive and innocent. He even told Sybil that
he liked Sharon, a three-year-old girl, because “she's never mean or unkind”
citation??
.
Therefore, he takes refuge in the naivety of children. However, when he realizes that at
some point children grow up and bec
ame adults, the soldier cannot accept it. For example,
when Sybil responds to him kissing her feet, he goes back into the hotel. There, the soldier
felt so helpless that he
” aimed the pistol, and fired a bullet through his right temple”. This
demonstrates that the soldier in this short story could not live with the fact that children do
not stay naive and innocent forever. However, in the short story “For Esmé — with Love and
Squalor”, the soldier recognizes that Esmé will grow up. In fact, he acknowledges that
everyone is forced to grow up;
punc :
“This is the squalid, or moving, part of the story, and
the scene changes. The people change, too.”
Citation?
This demonstrates that the soldier
realizes that Esmé will grow up and by doing so will change. Unlike the soldier in “A Perfect
Day for Bananafish
”, the soldier in “For Esmé” comes to terms with the fact that all children
must grow up. For example, rather than killing himself because he has not come to terms
with the aspect of children evolving, he attends Esmé’s wedding.
The story says he turned
down the invitation …
Be sure to get your facts straight about a story!
8
2)
In a paragraph of around 250-300 words, compare and contrast Salinger’s use of
one symbol in “Teddy” and one symbol in “The Laughing Man”. (10 marks). You must choose
symbols that have some area of similarity. Do NOT just focus on contrast.
J.D Salinger uses many symbols in his short stories. In “Teddy
”, Salinger uses orange peels
to symbolize Teddy’s natural or “
divine” curiosity
what does that mean exactly?
. The orange
peels show Teddy’s ability for in-depth thoughts
,
and it reinforces Teddy’s divine nature to the
readers. It also shows Teddy’s interests, he is not concerned with playing sports,
run on
sentence
he would rather meditate and contemplate death. Also, in “The Laughing Man
”,
Salinger uses the character of The Laughing Man as a symbol to show what Chief wants his
life to be like. Chief wants his life to be like The Laughing Man,
run on sentence
he wants to
be a leader and a hero for his friends. Therefore, both symbols demonstrate how the
characters want their lives to go. Teddy wants his life to be
about deep thoughts
not exactly
the case,
whereas the Chief of the Comanches wants his life to be one of a hero. Moreover,
the use of the orange peels allows Teddy to come out of his shell early in the short story.
Right off the bat
slang!!
the orange peels give Teddy the excuse to demonstrate his ability to
deconstruct large complex ideas. Teddy explains to the reader that the orange peels take a
position in time and space, and that if Teddy was not at the window at a certain time
,
he
would not have been able to see them which would have meant that it would have almost
been like they did not exist to him because he would not have seen them. This is a rather
remarkable observation for a 10 year old boy, which is precisely why Salinger uses the
orange peels,
run on sentence
he wants the readers to pick up on this fact early on.
Furthermore, Salinger employs this idea of symbols representing the characters' lives in
“The Laughing Man” as well. Salinger uses “The Laughing Man” to show how Chief wants to
be viewed by his friends, the children. Chief wants to indulge in the activities that will return
him to the “good old days” which refers to the days when he was a child,
where he had not
one care in the world, and had no responsibilities
the story does not say this and in fact it
implies that he came from a poor family so he would have had problems
. Thus, both
symbols represent the characters’ choice on how to live their lives, Chief in the past, and
Teddy in the future.
7
3)
In a paragraph of around 250-300 words, compare and contrast Salinger’s use of a
frame narrative in “For Esmé — with Love and Squalor” and “The Laughing Man”. (10
marks)
In both the short stories “For Esmé — with Love and Squalor” and “The Laughing Man”,
Salinger use
s
the frame narrative to emphasize important aspects of the story. For example,
the narrative frame in “For Esmé” is used to demonstrate the major impact that Esmé had on
the soldier’s life. The story begins with the soldier receiving airmail from the little girl asking
him to come to her wedding. It shows that they are both still in contact and that he also had a
big impact on her life. Furthermore, the narrative frame tells the story of how Esmé and the
soldier met for the first time. It was just before the war which was of course an influential
event in the soldier’s life. Moreover, Esmé writes a letter to the soldier while he is at war.
Therefore
, the soldier was really affected by the letter and it “was long before [he] could set
the note aside”. Thus, the narrative frame in “For Esmé” is used by the author to emphasize
the meeting of the little girl and the soldier to demonstrate to
which
what
extent the man was
impacted by her. Also, Salinger uses the narrative frame in “The Laughing Man” to
emphasize the emotions of the “Chief” or John Gedsudski. This short story begins by
introducing the baseball team of the
Commanches
sp!
. After each of their games, the Chief
tells a story. However, the story of “The Laughing Man” evolves according to the emotions of
the Chief. For example, at the end of the story, when the Chief fights with his probable
girlfriend, the Laughing Man dies. Moreover, what finally killed the Laughing
man is the pain
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help