MGT331-GroupD-Mini-Case 6_Hovey & Beard Company
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Grand Valley State University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
MGT-366
Subject
English
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by SuperHumanFlower12693
Hovey and Beard
Company
The Hovey and Beard Company manufactures a variety of
wooden toys, including animals, pull toys, and the like.
The toys were manufactured by a transformation process
that began in the wood room. There, toys were cut,
sanded, and partially assembled. Then the toys were
dipped into shellac and sent to the painting room.
In years past, the painting had been done by hand, with
each employee working with a given toy until its painting
was completed. The toys were predominantly two-
colored, although a few required more colors. Now in
response to increased demand for the toys, the painting
operation was changed so that the painters sat in a line
by an endless chain of hooks. These hooks moved
continuously in front of the painters and passed into a
long horizontal oven. Each painter sat in a booth
designed to carry away fumes and to backstop excess
paint. The painters would take a toy from a nearby tray,
position it in a jig inside the painting cubicle, spray on the
color according to a pattern, and then hang the toy on a
passing hook. The rate at which the hooks moved was
calculated by the engineers so that each painter, when
fully trained, could hang a painted toy on each hook
before it passed beyond reach.
The painters were paid on a group bonus plan. Since the
operation was new to them, they received a learning
bonus that decreased by regular amounts each month.
The learning bonus was scheduled to vanish in six
months, by which time it was expected that they would
be on their own—that is, able to meet the production
standard and earn a group bonus when they exceeded it.
By the second month of the training period, trouble
developed. The painters learned more slowly than had
been anticipated and it began to look as though their
production would stabilize far below what was planned.
Many of the hooks were going by empty. The painters
complained that the hooks moved too fast and that the
engineer had set the rates wrong. A few painters quit and
had to be replaced with new ones. This further
aggravated the learning problem. The team spirit that the
management had expected to develop through the group
bonus was not in evidence except as an expression of
what the engineers called "resistance." One painter,
whom the group regarded as its leader (and the
management regarded as the ringleader), was outspoken
in taking the complaints of the group to the supervisor.
These complaints were that the job was messy, the hooks
moved too fast, the incentive pay was not correctly
calculated, and it was too hot working so close to the
drying oven.
A consultant was hired to work with the supervisor. She
recommended that the painters be brought together for
a general discussion of the working conditions. Although
hesitant, the supervisor agreed to this plan.
The first meeting was held immediately after the shift
was over at 4 P.M. It was attended by all eight painters.
They voiced the same complaints again: the hooks went
by too fast, the job was too dirty, and the room was hot
and poorly ventilated. For some reason, it was this last
item that seemed to bother them most. The supervisor
promised to discuss the problems of ventilation and
temperature with the engineers, and a second meeting
was scheduled. In the next few days, the supervisor had
several talks with the engineers. They, along with the
plant superintendent, felt that this was really a trumped-
up complaint and that the expense of corrective
measures would be prohibitively high.
The supervisor came to the second meeting with some
apprehensions. The painters, however, did not seem to
be much put out. Rather, they had a proposal of their
own to make. They felt that if several large fans were set
up to circulate the air around their feet, they would be
much more comfortable. After some discussion, the
supervisor agreed to pursue the idea. The supervisor and
the consultant discussed the idea of fans with the
superintendent. Three large propeller-type fans were
purchased and installed.
The painters were jubilant. For several days the fans were
moved about in various positions until they were placed
to the satisfaction of the group. The painters seemed
completely satisfied with the results, and the relations
between them and the supervisor improved visibly.
The supervisor, after this encouraging episode, decided
that further meetings might also prove profitable. The
painters were asked if they would like to meet and
discuss other aspects of the work situation. They were
eager to do this. Another meeting was held, and the
discussion quickly centered on the speed of the hooks.
The painters maintained that the engineer had set them
at an unreasonably fast speed and that they would never
be able to fill enough of them to make a bonus.
The discussion reached a turning point when the group's
leader explained that it wasn't that the painters couldn't
work fast enough to keep up with the hooks but that they
couldn't work at that pace all day long. The supervisor
explored the point. The painters were unanimous in their
opinion that they could keep up with the belt for short
periods if they wanted to. But they didn't want to
because if they showed they could do this for short
periods then they would be expected to do it all day long.
The meeting ended with an unprecedented request by
the painters: "Let us adjust the speed of the belt faster or
slower depending on how we feel." The supervisor
agreed to discuss this with the superintendent and the
engineers.
The engineers reacted negatively to the suggestion.
However, after several meetings, it was granted that
there was some latitude within which variations in the
speed of the hooks would not affect the finished product.
After considerable argument with the engineers, it was
agreed to try out the painters' idea.
With misgivings, the supervisor had a control with a dial
marked "low, medium, fast" installed at the booth of the
group leader. The speed of the belt could now be
adjusted anywhere between the lower and upper limits
that the engineers had set.
The painters were delighted and spent many lunch hours
deciding how the speed of the belt should be varied from
hour to hour throughout the day. Within a week the
pattern had settled down to one in which the first half-
hour of the shift was run on a medium speed (a dial
setting slightly above the point marked "medium"). The
next two and a half hours were run at high speed, and
the half-hour before lunch and the half-hour after lunch
were run at low speed. The rest of the afternoon was run
at high speed with the exception of the last 45 minutes of
the shift, which was run at medium.
The constant speed at which the engineers had originally
set the belt was actually slightly below the "medium"
mark on the control dial; the average speed at which the
painters were running the belt was on the high side of
the dial. Few, if any, empty hooks entered the oven, and
inspection showed no increase of rejects from the paint
room.
Production increased, and within three weeks (some two
months before the scheduled ending of the learning
bonus) the painters were operating at 30 to 50 percent
above the level that had been expected under the
original arrangement. Naturally, their earnings were
correspondingly higher than anticipated. They were
collecting their base pay, earning a considerable piece-
rate bonus, and still benefiting from the learning bonus.
They were earning more now than many skilled workers
in other parts of the plant.
Management was besieged by demands that the inequity
between the earnings of the painters and those of other
workers in the plant be taken care of. With growing
irritation between the superintendent and the supervisor,
the engineers and supervisor, and the superintendent
and engineers, the situation came to a head when the
superintendent revoked the learning bonus and returned
the painting operation to its original status: the hooks
moved again at their constant, time-studied, designated
speed. Production dropped again and within a month all
but two of the eight painters had quit. The supervisor
stayed on for several months, but, feeling aggrieved, left
for another job.
Discussion Questions:
1.
Indicate whether the overall “motivating potential score” for the painters’ job is high, moderate, or low at each of the
following four phases (I am looking for one-word answers for a-d).
a.
Before changing to the assembly line:
Moderate
b.
Immediately after changing to the assembly line:
Low
c.
After the changes were made by the employees:
High
d.
At the very end of the case:
Low
Now elaborate on your responses to a-d as a whole. Did changes in job design impact job performance? Explain.
Yes, changes in the job design did impact the job performance. Personal and work outcomes are exhibited through high
internal work motivation, high quality work motivation, high satisfaction with the work, and low absenteeism and turnover.
Before changing the assembly line, the motivating potential score was low because the workers exhibited low satisfaction
due to the lack of responsibility for outcomes due to lack of autonomy. After stage “b”, autonomy was taken into account,
thus increasing overall satisfaction of the job and quality work performance. During stage “c”, the employee’s autonomy
increased, which increased the experienced responsibility for the outcomes of their work. Finally, in state “d”, the autonomy
was taken away, thus resulting in high absenteeism and turnover.
2.
Choose
one
(and
only one
) of the following theories and indicate how the theory helps explain behaviors that occurred
in this case:
a.
Reinforcement:
b.
Maslow’s needs hierarchy:
C.
Motivator-hygiene:
In the beginning of the case, there were many poor hygiene factors such as all of the workers
being very hot and the hooks moving at a constant, fast rate. This resulted in these workers having low satisfaction.
However, as these hygiene factors were fixed with the fans and the ability to control the rate of the hooks, the
painters’ lower motivation became a more moderate satisfaction. However, as the painters kept holding meetings
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help