fin prob 5 3000

.docx

School

University of Guelph *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

3000

Subject

Finance

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

3

Uploaded by MasterDiscovery81

Report
Question content area top Part 1 You are invested in GreenFrame, Inc. The CEO owns 4 % of GreenFrame and is considering an acquisition. If the acquisition destroys $ 57 million of GreenFrame's value, but the present value of the CEO's compensation increases by $ 6 million, will he be better or worse off? Question content area bottom Part 1 The CEO will be better off. His portion of the $ 57 million loss in firm value is 4 %, or $ 2.28 million. If his compensation increases by $ 6 million, even for only one year, he will be better off by $ 3.72 million Based on the given example: The CEO owns 4% of GreenFrame, Inc. An acquisition is being considered that would result in a $57 million loss in GreenFrame's value. However, the CEO's compensation would increase by $6 million as a result of the acquisition. The methodology used to determine whether the CEO would be better or worse off is as follows: Calculate the CEO's portion of the loss in firm value: 4% of $57 million = $2.28 million. Calculate the net change in the CEO's wealth: Increase in compensation ($6 million) minus the CEO's portion of the loss ($2.28 million). Determine whether the net change in wealth is positive or negative. In this case, the net change in the CEO's wealth is positive. Therefore, the CEO would be better off by $3.72 million ($6 million - $2.28 million). If you have different values for the question in the next instructions, please provide them, and I'll use the same methodology to analyze them. You are invested in GreenFrame, Inc. The CEO owns 4 % of GreenFrame and is considering an acquisition. If the acquisition destroys $ 54 million of GreenFrame's value, but the present value of the CEO's compensation increases by $ 6 million, will he be better or worse off? Question content area bottom Part 1 (Select from the drop-down menu.) The CEO with be worse off indifferent better off because his wealth has changed by $
enter your response here million. (Round to two decimal places.) To determine whether the CEO will be better off or worse off, let's use the same methodology as before with the updated values: Calculate the CEO's portion of the loss in firm value: 4% of $54 million = $2.16 million. Calculate the net change in the CEO's wealth: Increase in compensation ($6 million) minus the CEO's portion of the loss ($2.16 million). Determine whether the net change in wealth is positive or negative. Using the updated values: Net change in CEO's wealth = $6 million - $2.16 million = $3.84 million The CEO will be better off by $3.84 million. So, the CEO will be better off because his wealth has changed by $3.84 million. One or more of your responses is incorrect. The CEO's portion of the $ 54 million loss in firm value is 4 % is $ 2.16 million. Compare this to the increase in his compensation. Apologies for the oversight. Let's correct that. The CEO's portion of the loss in firm value is indeed 4% of $54 million, which equals $2.16 million. Comparing this to the increase in compensation, which is $6 million, we can determine whether the CEO will be better off or worse off: Increase in compensation: $6 million CEO's portion of the loss: -$2.16 million Net change in CEO's wealth: $6 million - $2.16 million = $3.84 million Since the net change in the CEO's wealth is positive ($3.84 million), the CEO will be better off by $3.84 million.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help