Module 8 Short Responses – Question 1 Consider the following statement: The support of non-Native Alaskans was an important factor leading to the settlement of Alaska Native land claims
. Is this conclusion consistent with the evidence presented in this learning block? Answer Yes or No, and then explain your choice in one or two sentences.
No, I do not think the conclusion is consistent with the evidence presented within the learning
block. There is enough evidence to create the though however there isn't enough to draw the full conclusion.
Module 8 Short Responses – Question 2 Consider the following statement: ANCSA was a fair settlement for Alaska Natives
. Is this conclusion consistent with the evidence presented in this learning block? Answer Yes or No, and then explain your choice in one or two sentences.
Yes, I think that this conclusion is consistent with the evidence presented within this learning block. The ANSCA were fair to the Alaskan Natives as they were able to keep their land and their way of making money.
Module 8 Short Responses – Question 3 Consider the following statement: ANCSA led to economic benefits for white Alaskans as well as for Natives
. Is this conclusion consistent with the evidence presented in this learning block? Answer Yes or No, and then explain your choice in one or two sentences.
Yes, this conclusion consistent with the evidence presented in this learning block. Although the learning block does not state the race, it does state that the ANCSA led to economic benefits it just ensures Alaskan natives.
Module 8 Short Responses – Question 4 For an American Literature course:
What skills from this course would you use to develop a brief essay on the significance of Walt Whitman's "When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloom'd," a poem written in the summer of 1865?
During this course I have been able to gain an understand on the best steps to write an essay. I