Activity 7

.docx

School

Concordia University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

301

Subject

History

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by MajorCrabPerson111

Report
Which of the piece of evidence that we covered in class 14 (the events of 701 BCE) stood out to you most and why? The piece of evidence from class 14 (the events of 701 BCE) that stood out to me the most is the mention of Assyrian sources that seem to corroborate the biblical accounts. Specifically, the events involving King Sennacherib of Assyria and King Hezekiah of Judah were fascinating. It's intriguing to find evidence from present-day Iraq that sheds light on the actions and the geopolitical interplay between these two monarchs during their era. What deepened my interest was the discovery of royal storage jars from Hezekiah's time, which could indicate preparations for a potential siege or conflict. This provides a tangible connection between archaeological artifacts and historical narratives, bridging the gap between the past and the present. What are three things you learned in class 14? What are two questions you still have? What is one thing you'd like to research further? 1. King Sennacherib of Assyria undertook a comprehensive campaign against the fortified cities of Judah, a pivotal event in the region's history. 2. While the biblical accounts offer a particular perspective on these events, Assyrian sources present alternative viewpoints, making the study of this period multidimensional. 3. The discovery of the royal storage jars from King Hezekiah's era is not just a piece of historical trivia but a tangible artifact that aligns with and potentially supports parts of the biblical narratives. Two questions I still have: 1. Given the passage of time and potential biases, how can we assess the reliability of the Assyrian sources when juxtaposed with the biblical narratives? 2. Beyond the specifics of 701 BCE, how do these events intertwine with the broader historical and geopolitical fabric of the Middle Eastern region? What is a comment made by someone else about what they are learning in this class that stood out to you in Class 13 discussion? My friend, Cyril said that the lesson on biblical monarchy deeply intrigued him. It not only portrayed the organization of the Israelites but also their unique relationship with God. Different academic methods unveil varying views on the monarchy, from outright rejection to conditional approval. This is evident in the hesitancy seen in 1 Samuel, emphasizing human fallibility versus God's superiority. The Israelites' desire for a king like other nations shows cultural pressures and historical evolution. However, the biblical stance evolves to a conditional
acceptance, evident in Deuteronomy and the contrasting trajectories of Saul and David. The Bible emphasizes God's timeless sovereignty, suggesting critiques of human leadership. The connection between the Davidic monarchy and the Mosaic covenant underscores the importance of allegiance to God's alliance.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help