PenangCase2023 (1)
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Arizona State University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
MISC
Subject
Industrial Engineering
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
Pages
2
Uploaded by LieutenantGullMaster890
•
•
8
I
Chapter
12
Manag
in
g
Un
ce
rt
ainty
in
a Su
pp
ly Cha
in
Safety In
ve
nt
ory
3
53
CASE
STUDY
Should
Packing
Be
Postponed
to
the
DC?
Penang Electronics (PE)
is
a contract manufacturer that
produces and packages private-label products for several
retail chains, including Target, Best Buy, Staples, and
Office Max. In each case, the basic products are identi-
cal, with the only difference being the labeling and the
packaging. Thus, the labeled and packed version
of
the
product destined for Target cannot be sent to Best Buy.
Currently, a production facility in Malaysia is used
to manufacture, label, and pack all products. The manu-
facturing facility replenishes a DC in St. Louis, from
which the
contract
manufacturer
fills all
customer
orders. The manufacturing and transportation lead time
from Penang to St. Louis is nine weeks. PE uses a con-
tinuous review policy to manage inventories at its DC
and aims to provide a cycle service level
of
95
percent
for each product to every customer.
The previous month had been very challenging
because Best Buy requested 5,000 additional units beyond
what was available at the DC, whereas Target ordered
3,500 fewer units and Staples ordered 4,000 fewer units.
Even though there was sufficient product inventory avail-
able at the DC (in the form
of
the basic product), PE could
not meet the Best Buy request because the excess inven-
tory available was labeled and packed for other custom-
ers. The DC had leftover inventory from Target and
Staples, which unfortunately could not be used to serve
Best Buy. PE had lost business while carrying surplus
inventory, all because
of
the wrong labels and packaging.
Labeling and Packaging
at
the
DC
The vice president
of
supply chain at PE proposed post-
poning the final labeling and packaging to the DC. Her
logic was that postponing labeling and packaging
to
the
DC would allow PE to use all available inventories to
serve any customer. In particular, the situation that arose
in
the previous month
wh
en Best Buy did not get
it
s ent
ir
e
order could have been a
voi
ded
th
rough
po
stponemen
t.
If
packaging was shifted
to
the DC,
th
e lead time of ma
nu
fac
-
turing and transporting the bas
ic
product
from
Mala
ys
ia
would continue
to
be about nine
we
eks. Labe
Lin
g and p
ac
k-
aging were relatively quick steps a
nd
th
e
re
sponse time
from the DC
to
the customer
was
not
ex
pected to c
han
ge.
The DC management was opposed to
th
is idea
because
it
would create additional work
th
at was diffe
r-
ent from what they had done so
far.
A deta
il
ed s
tu
dy
of
the production process showed that labeling a
nd
packa
g-
ing at the DC cost $2 per unit more
th
an
th
e cost
of
labeling and packaging
in
Malaysia. DC management
believed that this increase
in
cost would be he
ld
aga
in
st
them once the process was changed, and they would be
under constant pressure
to
lower cos
t.
They
al
so believed
it would complicate the work they did when filling an
order and could adversely impact customer service.
Evaluating the Two Options
To
evaluate the two options, a team from both manufac-
turing and the DC was set
up
. The team decided
to
focus
its analysis on three major product categories
-comput-
ers, printers, and scanners, and four major customers-
Target,
Best
Buy, Staples, and Office Max. Wee
kl
y
demand for each product and
customer
is shown
in
Table 12-9. In each case, "Mean" indicates the average
weekly demand, and
"SD"
indicates the standard devia-
tion
of
weekly demand. All demand was assumed to be
normally distributed. PE incurred a total cost
of
$1,000
per computer, $300 per printer, a
nd
$ I 00 per scanne
r.
Given the short life cycle
of
these products, PE
us
ed an
annual holding
cost
of
30 percent when making
it
s
inventory decisions.
It
was assumed that batch sizes and
cycle inventories would be unchanged
itTe
spective
of
TABLE
12-9
Distribution of Weekly Demand
by
Product
and
Customer
Computers
Printers
Scanners
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Target
1,000
700
2,000
1,000
4,000
1,000
Best
Buy
700
600
1,500
800
4,500
900
Office
Max
800
600
1,200
600
2,000
700
Staples
500
400
900
500
1,400
50
0
See data and questions in Penang Guideline
354
Chapter
12
Managing Uncertainty in a Supply Chain Safety Inventory
where packaging and labeling
were
done
. Thus, the
team
analyzed the impact
of
postponement
on
safety invento-
ries before
making
a final
recommendation
.
Questions
1.
What is the annual holding cost
of
safety inventory for the
current system in which product is produced, labeled, and
packed in Malaysia before being shipped to the DC?
2.
How
would the holding cost
of
safe
ty
inventory change
if
labeling and packaging were moved to the
DC ~
Evalu::ue
the change in inventory costs
as
the correla
ti
on codficiem
of
demand between any pair
of
customers Yaries from
O
to
0.5
to
1.0.
3.
How
should
PE
s
et
up its production, labeling. and pack-
aging
proce
sse
s?
Do
es
yo
ur
answer change
if
the addi-
tional cost
of
labeling and packaging at the DC is reduced
to
$1
(from the current value
of
$2)?
•
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help