W10 Case Study Set Up-4

.docx

School

Brigham Young University, Idaho *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

211

Subject

Information Systems

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by BrigadierGalaxy8536

Case Study Set Up Issue #1, and # 2 Maintaining safety while perusing profits from operations The primary issue at the core of the Deepwater Horizon disaster was a series of decisions that had to be made in order to prioritize time and cost savings over safety and best practices in drilling operations. Some of the problems that corisponded with this were: Well Casting Design - Choosing between the long string casing and liner/tieback options directly affected the number of barriers against oil and gas leaks. The long string casing, while quicker to install, provided fewer barriers compared to the liner/tieback, which offered more protection. Centralizers - The number and type of centralizers used during cementing impacted the risk of gas flow problems. Despite recommendations for more centralizers to ensure proper cementing, the decision was made to proceed with fewer, potentially compromising the integrity of the cement job. Mud Circulation and Cement Bond Log - The decision to conduct a partial mud circulation and skip the cement bond log disregarded industry best practices and warnings about potential issues with the cementing process, such as channeling.rriers compared to the liner/tieback, which offered more protection. Solution for problem #1 and #2: Addressing the issues that led to the oil rig disaster involves an overhaul of safety protocols, decision- making processes, and industry regulations. Here are some potential solutions: Short Term: Emergency Response Plan: Ensure there's a solid plan in place to respond quickly if something goes wrong, including how to stop leaks and protect the environment. Temporary Halt : Consider pausing operations if there's any uncertainty or risk until it's safe to continue. Intensive Monitoring: Increase the frequency of checks and inspections to catch any issues early. Training: Provide rapid training or reminders about safety procedures to all workers involved. Immediate Improvements: Implement quick fixes or changes in procedures that can enhance safety without halting operations.

These solutions aim to address immediate risks and vulnerabilities while setting the stage for more comprehensive, long-term changes. Long Term: Technology Development: Invest in advanced technology for well monitoring, blowout prevention, and safety systems that can detect issues before they escalate. Regulation Enhancement: Collaborate with regulatory bodies to establish stricter guidelines and regularly update industry standards to ensure better safety practices. Training and Education: Develop comprehensive training programs for all involved parties, emphasizing safety protocols, emergency response, and environmental protection. Risk Assessment and Management: Conduct thorough risk assessments at every stage of drilling, identifying potential issues and developing robust contingency plans. Industry Collaboration: Foster collaboration among industry stakeholders to share best practices, lessons learned, and innovations to enhance overall safety. Transparency and Accountability: Promote transparency in reporting incidents and near-misses, and hold companies accountable for negligence or non-compliance. Implementing these long-term solutions can significantly reduce the likelihood of similar disasters in the future while ensuring the safety of both workers and the environment. Risks: Implementing: Operational Disruption : Introducing new safety protocols might disrupt ongoing operations, causing delays and potentially impacting production schedules. Cost Overruns: Immediate implementation of safety measures could lead to unexpected costs, affecting project budgets and financial outcomes. Technical Challenges: Integrating new technologies and equipment into existing infrastructure may pose technical challenges and require additional training. Public Perception: A perception that immediate changes are reactive rather than proactive might impact public trust and investor confidence. Managing these risks requires a balanced approach, phased implementation, effective communication about the necessity of changes, robust training programs, and collaboration among industry stakeholders and regulatory bodies. Balancing safety enhancement with operational efficiency is crucial to mitigate these risks effectively. Not implementing: Accidents and Disasters: Without stringent safety protocols, the risk of accidents, oil spills, blowouts, and other disasters increases, leading to environmental damage, loss of life, and property destruction.

Environmental Impact: Failure to implement safety measures heightens the risk of ecological disasters, polluting water bodies, damaging ecosystems, and harming wildlife. Health Hazards: Workers face increased risks of injury or health issues due to inadequate safety measures, including exposure to toxic chemicals, accidents, and long-term health complications. Reputation and Public Trust: Incidents resulting from a lack of safety measures can severely damage a company's reputation, leading to public distrust, legal liabilities, and financial losses. Operational Disruption: In the event of accidents, operational disruptions, facility shutdowns, and production halts can occur, impacting revenue streams and market competitiveness. Issue #3: Communication Throughout the case study, there were instances where information about potential risks or warnings from different parties involved in the project BP's personnel, contractors, and engineers was not effectively communicated or acted upon. Decisions were made without full consideration of warnings or recommendations, and critical information regarding the well's integrity, potential hazards, or past experiences with similar situations was not adequately shared or taken into account. This lack of transparent communication and the failure to heed warnings might have significantly contributed to the decisions that led to the disaster. Improved communication channels and a culture that encourages open and transparent sharing of information might have mitigated some of the risks and allowed for more informed decision-making. Solution: Short Term: E mergency Response Plan : Develop and implement a robust emergency response plan that includes clear procedures for handling similar crises, ensuring rapid and effective responses to any emergent situations. Immediate Safety Audits and Inspections: Conduct immediate safety audits and inspections on existing rigs and ongoing projects to identify potential hazards and rectify any existing safety issues. Improved Training and Awareness : Conduct emergency training programs for all personnel involved in offshore drilling to ensure they are well-prepared to respond to unforeseen incidents. Immediate Risk Mitigation: Implement temporary measures to mitigate any identified immediate risks, such as reinforcing safety protocols, halting operations in high-risk areas, or upgrading equipment. Transparency and Accountability: Foster a transparent environment where reporting and accountability are encouraged, ensuring that all incidents are reported, investigated, and learnings are disseminated promptly.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help