Case%20Brief%20Template%2017

.docx

School

University of California, Berkeley *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

138

Subject

Law

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

4

Uploaded by jasminejohnson373732

Sample Case Brief SAMPLE CASE The following is a sample case that is commonly used in Contracts Cases to illustrate the idea of a "legal duty." Each element is identified. STEPHEN GRAY, RESPONDENT, v. THERESA D. MARTINO, APPELLANT Supreme Court of New Jersey 91 N.J.L. 462; 103 A. 24 February 2, 1918, Decided Parties: These are the primary parties. Generally the case will be referred to only by the last names of the parties. E.g. Gray v. Martino . MINTURN, J. The plaintiff occupied the position of a special police officer, in Atlantic City, and incidentally was identified with the work of the prosecutor of the pleas of the county. He possessed knowledge concerning the theft of certain diamonds and jewelry from the possession of the defendant, who had advertised a reward for the recovery of the property. In this situation he claims to Facts of the case: What happened that brought these parties to court?
have entered into a verbal contract with defendant, whereby she agreed to pay him $500 if he could procure for her the names and addresses of the thieves. As a result of his meditation with the police authorities the diamonds and jewelry were recovered, and plaintiff brought this suit to recover the promised reward. The District Court, sitting without a jury, awarded plaintiff a judgment for the amount of the reward, and hence this appeal. Procedural History: Who won in the court below? Various points are discussed in the briefs, but to us the dominant and conspicuous inquiry in the case is, was the plaintiff, during the period of this transaction, a public officer, charged with the enforcement of the law? Legal Issue: What fact or circumstance is at issue that will be the deciding factor in how the court rules on this case? The testimony makes it manifest that he was a special police officer to some extent identified with the work of the prosecutor's office, and that position, upon well-settled grounds of public policy, required him to assist, at least, in the prosecution of offenders Reasoning/Analysis: The court applies the facts to see whether they satisfy the elements of the rule.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help