Wk 4 - Article Critique Assignment Instructions

.docx

School

Liberty University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

500

Subject

Law

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by ProfessorHedgehog3323

CJUS 500 A RTICLE C RITIQUE A SSIGNMENT I NSTRUCTIONS O VERVIEW In the Article Critique Assignments , you will systematically and objectively critique criminal justice-related research articles to understand published research. You will critique the strengths and weaknesses of peer-reviewed journal articles and carefully analyze arguments and points in the article. You will develop the technical writing skill of critiquing while furthering critical thinking application and knowledge of the topics investigated. You will incorporate and apply a Christian worldview perspective to each topic and Article Critique Assignment . I NSTRUCTIONS  4-7 pages excluding the title page, abstract, and reference pages.  Current APA format.  Minimum of two (2) peer-reviewed journal articles from Liberty University library.  Acceptable sources (peer-reviewed articles published within the last 5-10 years only).  Include a critique of least two (2) strengths and two (2) weaknesses from each article.  Include a Christian and Biblical Worldview perspective. This Article Critique Assignment requires that you follow a template. Please review and follow the template carefully. Include a running header, title page, abstract (between 120-250 words), proper APA headings/subheadings, and a reference page. Please note that you are asked not to change or omit any of the bold headings that are already in the template. You are only asked to insert your written content into the appropriate sections of the template. Article Critique: Police Ethnocentricity, Subculture, and Historical Evolution Assignment Locate two (2) peer-reviewed articles no older than 5-10 years about ethics in policing administration. Provide an in-depth discussion of the findings in each article.  Based on your critique of the literary pieces, what might an ethical organization look like?  Specify the characteristics of training, leadership, and employees that might be expected in an ethical police organization.  Review the biblical themes in the video titled: “Police Ethnocentricity, Subculture, and Historical Evolution” found in the module’s Learn section .  Discuss some of the challenges associated with organizations that are replete with corruption like racism and discrimination from a Christian and Biblical worldview. Article Critique: Dual-Court System and Roles of Courtroom Workgroup Assignment Locate two (2) peer-reviewed articles no older than 5-10 years that discuss 2 historical Supreme Court cases and review the video titled: “Dual-Court System and Roles of Courtroom Workgroup” found in the module’s Learn section . This historical case law choice is limited to search and seizure, stop and frisk, searches for evidence, or police interrogation and confessions . Chosen articles do not have to be on the same topic although they may be. Find articles related to case law on the aforementioned topics but do not consider articles merely discussing the case law itself. Provide an in-depth discussion of the findings of each article. With Page 1 of 10

CJUS 500 respect to the specific case law you have analyzed, defend constitutional democracy and the issues raised in case law from a Christian and Biblical worldview. Article Critique: Correctional Goals and Prison Privatization Assignment Locate two (2) peer-reviewed articles no older than 5-10 years that discuss American prison privatization. One article must present arguments advocating for American prison privatization and the second article must present arguments against American prison privatization. Provide a critique of each author’s position on the privatization of prisons. Review the video titled: “Correctional Goals and Prison Privatization” found in the the module’s Learn section . From a Christian and Biblical worldview, critique the current state of private prisons in America and present a clear argument on how to fix the system. Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool. **Historical Supreme Court Case 1: Mapp v. Ohio (1961)** *Mapp v. Ohio* is a landmark case that dealt with the issue of unreasonable searches and seizures. In this case, Dollree Mapp's home was searched by the police without a proper warrant, and obscene materials were found. Mapp was convicted based on this evidence. However, the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, ruled that the evidence obtained through an illegal search and seizure was inadmissible in state courts. This decision extended the exclusionary rule to state courts, ensuring that evidence obtained through unlawful means would not be used in court. From a Christian and Biblical worldview, this case raises important questions about the protection of individual rights and the sanctity of one's home. The Bible emphasizes the importance of respecting personal property and the dignity of individuals. The Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, aligns with these principles, reflecting the value of privacy and the idea that individuals should not be subject to invasive government actions without just cause. **Historical Supreme Court Case 2: Miranda v. Arizona (1966)** *Miranda v. Arizona* is another significant case that deals with police interrogation and confessions. In this case, Ernesto Miranda was arrested and interrogated by the police without being informed of his right to remain silent and have an attorney present. Miranda confessed to the crime during the interrogation. The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, ruled that the confession was inadmissible because Miranda had not been informed of his Fifth Amendment rights. Page 2 of 10

CJUS 500 From a Christian and Biblical worldview, this case touches on the importance of truth and justice. The Bible emphasizes the truth and the principle that individuals should not be coerced into self-incrimination. In this case, the Supreme Court's decision aligns with the Biblical concept of ensuring that individuals are treated justly and provided with the necessary protections when facing interrogation by the government. In conclusion, both *Mapp v. Ohio* and *Miranda v. Arizona* represent significant Supreme Court decisions that have shaped the legal landscape in the United States regarding search and seizure, evidence, and police interrogations. These cases reflect the broader principles of individual rights, privacy, and justice that are not only foundational in the U.S. Constitution but can also be seen through a Christian and Biblical lens, emphasizing the importance of upholding these principles to maintain a just and democratic society. ————————————————— **Historical Supreme Court Case 1: Terry v. Ohio (1968)** *Terry v. Ohio* is a significant case that deals with the issue of "stop and frisk." In this case, an officer observed three individuals, including John Terry, acting suspiciously outside a store. The officer stopped and questioned them, and fearing they were armed, he conducted a pat-down search. A concealed weapon was found on John Terry, and he was arrested. The Supreme Court, in an 8-1 decision, upheld the stop and frisk as constitutional. The Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures allowed for brief, limited stops and searches by police when there is reasonable suspicion of criminal activity and concern for the officer's safety. From a Christian and Biblical worldview, *Terry v. Ohio* raises questions about balancing individual rights with public safety. The Bible emphasizes the need for order and safety in society (Romans 13:1-4), but it also recognizes the importance of protecting individual dignity and rights. In this case, the Court's decision attempts to strike a balance by permitting limited searches when there is reasonable suspicion, aligning with the Biblical principle of maintaining order while respecting individual rights. **Historical Supreme Court Case 2: Schmerber v. California (1966)** *Schmerber v. California* deals with the issue of searches for evidence, specifically involving blood tests for DUI cases. In this case, Schmerber was arrested for drunk driving, and a blood sample was taken without his consent while he was in police custody. The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, upheld the admissibility of the blood test results. The Court argued that the taking of a blood sample without a warrant was justified because of the need to prevent the dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream. Page 3 of 10

CJUS 500 From a Christian and Biblical worldview, this case raises questions about the importance of obtaining evidence while respecting an individual's bodily integrity. The Bible underscores the principle of respecting the sanctity of the body (1 Corinthians 6:19-20), but it also recognizes the need for justice and accountability (Proverbs 21:15). In this case, the Court's decision reflects the delicate balance between preserving evidence to ensure justice and respecting the physical autonomy of individuals, aligning with Biblical principles of fairness and justice. In summary, *Terry v. Ohio* and *Schmerber v. California* are two historical Supreme Court cases that address important issues related to search and seizure, stop and frisk, and searches for evidence. These cases demonstrate the ongoing challenge of balancing individual rights with the needs of law enforcement and public safety. From a Christian and Biblical perspective, these cases underscore the importance of justice, fairness, and respecting the dignity of individuals while maintaining order in society. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429030581- 10/miranda-rights-janet-ainsworth Ainsworth, J. (2020). Miranda Rights - Curtailing Coercion in Police Interrogation: The Failed Promise of Miranda v. Arizona. In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 95–111). essay, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ scal52&div=10&id=&page= https://books.google.com/books? hl=en&lr=&id=LzrlcPVUX2EC&oi=fnd&pg=PA255&dq=Schmerber+v. +California+(1966)&ots=IgkRHclwRc&sig=VmZyB0hyxNLn1_sczKtNri mq6qs#v=onepage&q=Schmerber%20v.%20California %20(1966)&f=false Page 4 of 10

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help