Brief of Braddock v
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Baruch College, CUNY *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1101
Subject
Law
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by BailiffTurkeyMaster1014
Title of the Case: Braddock v. Braddock, Supreme Court of New York (2007)
Facts:
John Braddock sued his cousin, David Braddock, for fraud. David wanted to form a company,
Broad Oak Energy (BOE), and asked John to find an investor to provide to BOE and also asked
John to work for BOE. David assured John that he would be BOE’s chief financial officer (CFO)
and land manager. David also told John that he, John, would receive half as much stock that he,
David, would receive. John then quit his job, found an investor for David, and moved to Texas.
Two weeks later, David told John that he would not be a CFO or a land manager, but a land man.
John “‘engagement agreements’ to accept the lesser position as an ‘employee at will,’ subject to
discharge for any reason at any time” (Braddock v. Braddock). As a result of stress John’s health
declined, and he was granted a medical leave of absence. A month later, John was fired. John
filed a suit in New York state court against David claiming that these circumstances constituted
fraud. The court dismissed his claims and John appealed.
Issue(s):
Is it fraudulent to offer a relative a job (that requires their relocation) only to reduce the job offer
to that of a lesser position? (Referenced Braddock v. Braddock)
Decision:
Yes. The Court found that John’s actions satisfied the requirements of fraud. There was a
misrepresentation of material fact and there was justifiable reliance on these facts and resulting
injury. (Referenced Braddock v. Braddock)
Opinions and Reasoning:
The majority concluded that John had reason to believe that David would treat him with good
faith and integrity as their relationship is one of family. This situation can be distinguished from
cases where the misrepresentations were “revealed by the time the deal was executed” (Braddock
v. Braddock). In this situation, though John signed documents that “altered the originally
promised terms of his position with the company (Braddock v. Braddock), the deal between the
two parties was underway even before anything was signed. John had already quit his former job
and moved to Texas. John was “no longer in a position to reject the offered terms or even to
negotiate effectively” (Braddock v. Braddock). John’s reliance on the claims made by David is
reasonable because they are family. Had they been strangers to each other, there would have been
strict reliance on the signed written documents. However, in this case, they were not strangers
and as a result, there was “expectation of the good faith of a family member” that would result in
“reliance on assurances that are not incorporated into written documents drafted and executed
later” (Braddock v. Braddock).
The dissenting opinion disagreed with the majority on the point that there was reason for John to
believe in David’s claims. At the time, BOE “was but an unfunded shell requiring for its viability
an enormous infusion of capital (Braddock v. Braddock). John, an experienced banker and
financial consultant, should have been well aware of the risks that came with his decision. In
these circumstances, “no promise of high executive-level employment in the company could
have been viewed to be an ‘assurance’ or a ‘guarantee’” (Braddock v. Braddock). What he
perceived to be ‘assurances’ and ‘guarantees’ can reasonably be understood as “expressions of
expectation or intent” (Braddock v. Braddock). While John may have had moral claim to rely on
his cousin even when objective circumstances counseled otherwise, there is no legal right to
recovery in fraud that may be vindicated upon such a predicate (Braddock v. Braddock). The
dissenting opinion called for the dismissal of John’s fraud cause of action.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help