Post 3
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University Of Charleston *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
626
Subject
Management
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by ColonelMoonPorpoise4
1. Discuss what these numbers imply for the decision of when to open a shared facility versus two separate facilities.
The presented data suggests that opting for a shared facility could yield significant cost savings, yet it emphasizes the need for a careful balance with the potential drawback of lower sales. While the cost reduction aspect is evident, it is crucial to weigh this against the possibility of consistently lower sales in the shared facility compared to two independent ones.
Several factors might contribute to the observed decline in sales in a shared facility. Customers might find it challenging to navigate between different restaurant concepts, leading to confusion and indecision. Additionally, the shared kitchen staff might face difficulties managing the demands of multiple restaurants, resulting in prolonged wait times for customers. Furthermore, the overall ambiance of a joint facility might be perceived as less inviting than that
of two separate establishments.
In the decision-making process regarding the opening of a shared facility, it is imperative to consider these factors. While cost savings are tempting, they must be carefully evaluated in light
of potential challenges, particularly if sales consistently lag behind. If the shared facility struggles to attract customers and maintain sales levels, a reconsideration of the strategy, possibly reverting to two independent facilities, may be necessary.
2. Explain the challenges that a restaurant owner could face when opening a multi-concept business.
Opening a multi-concept business poses distinct challenges for a restaurant owner, primarily revolving around the complexities of managing diverse menus and ensuring the comprehensive training of kitchen staff on both concepts. These challenges, if not adeptly addressed, could potentially lead to reduced sales and, ultimately, the closure of the establishment. (Mabel, 2021)
Embarking on a restaurant venture featuring multiple concepts demands astute management of
various menus concurrently. This entails guaranteeing an ample supply of quality food for both dining concepts, with a potential risk of inadequate management adversely affecting sales and overall customer satisfaction. (Mabel, 2021)
Additionally, the culinary staff must be proficiently trained on both menus, presenting a potential hurdle if the team is more experienced in one concept than the other. (Mabel, 2021)
Moreover, the success of a multi-concept business hinges on delivering a cohesive and inviting customer experience. A lack of warmth and friendliness in the shared facility could diminish customer frequency, underscoring the importance of maintaining a positive overall ambiance. These considerations underscore the need for careful planning and strategic management when
venturing into a multi-concept restaurant. (Mabel, 2021)
3. Explain your recommended plan to ensure the company is profitable.
To ensure the company's profitability, a prudent strategy involves cautious monitoring of sales at the shared facility and a comparative analysis with sales at independently operated facilities. If sales at the shared facility persistently underperform, a crucial consideration is exploring the option of reverting to two independent facilities.
Critical to financial success is the continuous monitoring of sales, enabling the restaurant proprietor to make informed decisions regarding the shared facility's viability. By tracking and contrasting sales at the shared facility with those at two distinct locations, the owner gains insights into the business's overall performance. If the shared facility consistently falls short in sales, the potential need to transition to two independent facilities becomes apparent.
In the comparison of sales between the shared facility and separate locations, meticulous attention to various variables is essential. This includes monitoring total sales, providing a comprehensive overview of the shared facility's revenue generation. Additionally, tracking individual item sales aids in identifying product performance, while monitoring customer traffic helps evaluate the shared facility's attractiveness to patrons. This thorough approach ensures a comprehensive assessment of the business's financial health.
4. Discuss and describe the long run effect of this multi-concept proposal. (Hint: Think indifference principle.)
The enduring impact of the multi-concept proposal suggests a potential trade-off, with the prospect of diminished overall sales counterbalanced by cost savings in real estate and labor. Before deciding to implement this strategy, careful consideration of its merits and drawbacks is essential.
In evaluating the viability of the multi-concept proposal, the consistent possibility of lower sales at the shared location compared to two separate facilities is a crucial factor. The decision-
making process should weigh this against the significance of the cost reductions achievable through the shared facility model. If the cost savings are substantial, there may be merit in adopting the proposal, even with the anticipation of reduced sales.
A comprehensive assessment involves considering the long-term consequences of the multi-
concept approach. If it is projected to result in lower total sales but offers significant cost savings over an extended period, it may be a strategic decision worth considering. Balancing these factors is essential for the restaurant owner to make an informed choice regarding the implementation of the multi-concept proposal.
5. Explain your recommended plan for budgeting to ensure cost-effective production.
To achieve cost-effective production, a recommended budgeting strategy involves meticulous monitoring of sales and expenses at the shared facility, with a readiness to adjust the budget if costs surpass sales. This proactive approach is crucial for maintaining financial equilibrium.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Related Questions
Given is a decision payoff table.
Alternatives
Small Facility
Medium Facility
Large Facility
Low
26
18
-7
Future Demand
Moderate
21
31
30
High
18
22
42
a) The best decision under uncertainty using MAXIMAX is to select Blank 1 facility
b) The best decision under uncertainty using MAXIMIN is to select Blank 2 facility
c) The best decision under uncertainty using LAPLACE/EQUALITY LIKELY is to select Blank 3 facility
d) If the probabilities for Future Demand when it is Low-0.35, Moderate -0.30, and High-0.35, the expected monetary value (EMV) for
the large facility-Blank 4.
arrow_forward
Amazon had planned to open a second headquarters in Brooklyn that would have allegedly added 25,000 jobs to the region, increased property values, generated more business for local store owners, and generated additional sales and income tax revenue
for the government. Some people were concerned, however, that increased home prices could lead to higher rent for people who rented apartments in Brooklyn. Which of the following statements are true?
O Allowing Amazon to locate its second headquarters in Brooklyn is a Pareto improvement (i.e., makes one or more persons better off without making anyone worse off) even if some renters will have to pay higher rent.
O Allowing Amazon to locate its second headquarters in Brooklyn would not be Kaldor-Hicks efficient if some renters will have to pay higher rent.
O Allowing Amazon to locate its second headquarters in Brooklyn is a Kaldor-Hicks improvement if the gain in jobs and tax revenue more than offsets any losses experienced by renters.
O…
arrow_forward
If an organization is placed in a potentially satisfactory location what do you think is the result? (Explain)
arrow_forward
During a major expansion in 2004, Douwalla’s Import Company developed a new processing line for which the delivered equipment cost was $1.75 million. This year, the board of directors decided to expand into new markets and expects to build the current version of the same line. Estimate the cost if the following factors are applicable: construction cost factor is 0.20, installation cost factor is 0.50, indirect cost factor applied against equipment is 0.25, and the total plant cost index has risen from 2509 to 3713 over the years.
arrow_forward
2) A company is considering a plan to produce or buy/outsource a certain item used in the
production of new type of cars. Making the item would involve annual lease costs of $150,000.
Cost and volume estimates are as follows:
Make
Buy
Annual fixed cost
$150,000
None
Variable cost/unit
$60
$80
Annual volume
12,000
12,000
(units)
a. Given these numbers, should the firm buy or make this item?
b. There is a possibility that volume could change in the future. At what volume would the
company be indifferent between making and buying?
arrow_forward
1
arrow_forward
2. Garysburg Fire Rescue (GFR) is considering three different locations for a new fire station. Using
factor rating, GFR has created the following table. When rating these locations, GFR used a 5-
point scale, where 1 means unfavorable and 5 means excellent. (Noteshaper Scenario #26)
Factor
Weight
Location 1
Location 2
Location 3
Cost of land
0.5
4
1
Accessibility
0.3
2
2
4
Size of Land
0.2
1
3
3
a. Which of the following statements are true and which are false?
I.
The cost of the available land parcel is of the greatest importance in this
analysis.
I.
Location 2 has better accessibility than location 3.
GFR considers the size of the available land parcel to be the least important
III.
factor.
arrow_forward
subject: Quantitative Analysis For Business
Please answer both.
22. Dawn owns a dog day care company that offers kenneling services for dogs that weigh less than 30 pounds. Dawn has decided to expand the building that houses the kennels by 1,000 square feet. A friend suggested that Dawn consider three expansion options: 1) only board dogs under 30 pounds; 2) only board dogs larger than 30 pounds; or 3) split the new space, allocating 50% to dogs under 30 pounds and 50% to dogs over 30 pounds.
Expansion Options
Strong Economy
Weak Economy
Likelihood 40%
Likelihood 60%
Only dogs under 30 pounds
$19,000 increase in revenue
$18,000 increase in revenue
Only large dogs
$22,000 increase in revenue
$15,000 increase in revenue
Split the space between small and large dogs
$20,000 increase in revenue
$16,000 increase in revenue
Based on the table shown above, which option has the highest expected value?
Splitting the space between small and large…
arrow_forward
In part (a), if Easy Time could arrange to purchase more baby food from one of the outlying locations, which should it be, how many additional cases could be purchased, and how much would this increase profit?
arrow_forward
An operations manager wants to use factor rating method to decide the location of a new restaurant. Weights of the three factors specified, and the scores of two options are shown in the table below. Which option should the operations manager choose and what is the weighted score of this option?
Factor
Weight
Option 1 Score
Option 2 Score
Proximity to the University
0.5
90
80
Rental Cost
0.3
80
100
Size
0.2
70
70
Option 2, weighted score = 84
Option 2, weighted score = 83
Option 1, weighted score = 83
There is no difference between the two options
Option 1, weighted score = 84
arrow_forward
Y5
arrow_forward
4.) After 10 years of production, the chemical manufacturing plant has become very successful. Because of its
success, a great demand for products came as many consumers wanted the company to sell them their
products. To meet the demand, three alternatives were considered.
Work overtime to meet demands. Annual overtime expenses are $500,000.
Expand the plant to accommodate more production. Fixed annual expenses are $2,500,000.
Make a contract with another company to produce additional products at a rate of $1,000,000.
The cost of manufacturing products from the three alternatives are $3500, $3000 and $3250 per unit
respectively. The plant sells every unit made regardless of how they were made at $15,000 per unit. The
expected demand for the product is
150 units with a probability of 50%
250 units with a probability of 35%
350 units with a probability of 7.5%
400 units with a probability of 5%
500 units with a probability of 2.5%
arrow_forward
As public awareness of the need to recycle, reuse and repair has grown, TerraCycle has found
that it has needed to create more recycling centres around the country to meet the new demand.
1. Identify two points of time throughout a one-year period where the capacity of the
TerraCycle Recycling Centres will exceed their normal operations capacity and explain
why there is an increase in demand during these periods.
2. Discuss at least three different approaches to managing capacity about TerraCycle and
the challenges which each approach may face.
3. Recommend one action based on your analysis of TerraCycle to improve capacity
management and explain how this could be implemented and monitored in the long run.
arrow_forward
1) For the problem data set below, what is the northwest corner allocation to the cell Source 3-Destination 3?
2) what is the overall cost?
arrow_forward
AHP
arrow_forward
The owner of a food truck implemented a new location strategy so that they would be better positioned near a crowded office park during the lunch hour. How should they evaluate the new location strategy?
arrow_forward
Problems 2
Helen Murvis, hospital administrator for Portland General Hospital, is trying to determine whether to
build a large wing onto the existing hospital, a small wing, or no wing at all. If the population of
Portland continues to grow, a large wing could return $150,000 to the hospital each year. If the small
wing were built, it would return S$60,000 to the hospital each year if the population continues to grow. If
the population of Portland remains the same, the hospital would encounter a loss of $85,000 if the large
wing were built. Furthermore, a loss of $45,000 would be realized if the small wing were constructed
and the population remains the same. Unfortunately, Helen does not have any information about the
future population of Portland
* Develop a decision table for this problem.
* Determine the best decision using the following decision criteria
1.
Мaximax
2. Маximin
3. Minimax Regret
Hurwicz (use a coefficient of realism of 0.75)
5. Equal likelihood
6. Expected Value
7.…
arrow_forward
Spectrum Hair Salon is considering expanding itsbusiness, as it is experiencing a large growth. Th e question iswhether it should expand with a bigger facility than needed,hoping that demand will catch up, or with a small facility,knowing that it will need to reconsider expanding in three years.Th e management at Spectrum has estimated the followingchances for demand:• Th e likelihood of demand being high is 0.70.• Th e likelihood of demand being low is 0.30.Estimated profi ts for each alternative are as follows:• Large expansion has an estimated profi tability of either$100,000 or $70,000, depending on whether demand turnsout to be high or low.• Small expansion has a profi tability of $50,000, assuming thatdemand is low.• Small expansion with an occurrence of high demand wouldrequire considering whether to expand further. If thebusiness expands at this point, the profi tability is expected tobe $90,000. If it does not expand further, the profi tability isexpected to be $60,000.
arrow_forward
Requirement:
Show your calculation
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:Cengage,
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Related Questions
- Given is a decision payoff table. Alternatives Small Facility Medium Facility Large Facility Low 26 18 -7 Future Demand Moderate 21 31 30 High 18 22 42 a) The best decision under uncertainty using MAXIMAX is to select Blank 1 facility b) The best decision under uncertainty using MAXIMIN is to select Blank 2 facility c) The best decision under uncertainty using LAPLACE/EQUALITY LIKELY is to select Blank 3 facility d) If the probabilities for Future Demand when it is Low-0.35, Moderate -0.30, and High-0.35, the expected monetary value (EMV) for the large facility-Blank 4.arrow_forwardAmazon had planned to open a second headquarters in Brooklyn that would have allegedly added 25,000 jobs to the region, increased property values, generated more business for local store owners, and generated additional sales and income tax revenue for the government. Some people were concerned, however, that increased home prices could lead to higher rent for people who rented apartments in Brooklyn. Which of the following statements are true? O Allowing Amazon to locate its second headquarters in Brooklyn is a Pareto improvement (i.e., makes one or more persons better off without making anyone worse off) even if some renters will have to pay higher rent. O Allowing Amazon to locate its second headquarters in Brooklyn would not be Kaldor-Hicks efficient if some renters will have to pay higher rent. O Allowing Amazon to locate its second headquarters in Brooklyn is a Kaldor-Hicks improvement if the gain in jobs and tax revenue more than offsets any losses experienced by renters. O…arrow_forwardIf an organization is placed in a potentially satisfactory location what do you think is the result? (Explain)arrow_forward
- During a major expansion in 2004, Douwalla’s Import Company developed a new processing line for which the delivered equipment cost was $1.75 million. This year, the board of directors decided to expand into new markets and expects to build the current version of the same line. Estimate the cost if the following factors are applicable: construction cost factor is 0.20, installation cost factor is 0.50, indirect cost factor applied against equipment is 0.25, and the total plant cost index has risen from 2509 to 3713 over the years.arrow_forward2) A company is considering a plan to produce or buy/outsource a certain item used in the production of new type of cars. Making the item would involve annual lease costs of $150,000. Cost and volume estimates are as follows: Make Buy Annual fixed cost $150,000 None Variable cost/unit $60 $80 Annual volume 12,000 12,000 (units) a. Given these numbers, should the firm buy or make this item? b. There is a possibility that volume could change in the future. At what volume would the company be indifferent between making and buying?arrow_forward1arrow_forward
- 2. Garysburg Fire Rescue (GFR) is considering three different locations for a new fire station. Using factor rating, GFR has created the following table. When rating these locations, GFR used a 5- point scale, where 1 means unfavorable and 5 means excellent. (Noteshaper Scenario #26) Factor Weight Location 1 Location 2 Location 3 Cost of land 0.5 4 1 Accessibility 0.3 2 2 4 Size of Land 0.2 1 3 3 a. Which of the following statements are true and which are false? I. The cost of the available land parcel is of the greatest importance in this analysis. I. Location 2 has better accessibility than location 3. GFR considers the size of the available land parcel to be the least important III. factor.arrow_forwardsubject: Quantitative Analysis For Business Please answer both. 22. Dawn owns a dog day care company that offers kenneling services for dogs that weigh less than 30 pounds. Dawn has decided to expand the building that houses the kennels by 1,000 square feet. A friend suggested that Dawn consider three expansion options: 1) only board dogs under 30 pounds; 2) only board dogs larger than 30 pounds; or 3) split the new space, allocating 50% to dogs under 30 pounds and 50% to dogs over 30 pounds. Expansion Options Strong Economy Weak Economy Likelihood 40% Likelihood 60% Only dogs under 30 pounds $19,000 increase in revenue $18,000 increase in revenue Only large dogs $22,000 increase in revenue $15,000 increase in revenue Split the space between small and large dogs $20,000 increase in revenue $16,000 increase in revenue Based on the table shown above, which option has the highest expected value? Splitting the space between small and large…arrow_forwardIn part (a), if Easy Time could arrange to purchase more baby food from one of the outlying locations, which should it be, how many additional cases could be purchased, and how much would this increase profit?arrow_forward
- An operations manager wants to use factor rating method to decide the location of a new restaurant. Weights of the three factors specified, and the scores of two options are shown in the table below. Which option should the operations manager choose and what is the weighted score of this option? Factor Weight Option 1 Score Option 2 Score Proximity to the University 0.5 90 80 Rental Cost 0.3 80 100 Size 0.2 70 70 Option 2, weighted score = 84 Option 2, weighted score = 83 Option 1, weighted score = 83 There is no difference between the two options Option 1, weighted score = 84arrow_forwardY5arrow_forward4.) After 10 years of production, the chemical manufacturing plant has become very successful. Because of its success, a great demand for products came as many consumers wanted the company to sell them their products. To meet the demand, three alternatives were considered. Work overtime to meet demands. Annual overtime expenses are $500,000. Expand the plant to accommodate more production. Fixed annual expenses are $2,500,000. Make a contract with another company to produce additional products at a rate of $1,000,000. The cost of manufacturing products from the three alternatives are $3500, $3000 and $3250 per unit respectively. The plant sells every unit made regardless of how they were made at $15,000 per unit. The expected demand for the product is 150 units with a probability of 50% 250 units with a probability of 35% 350 units with a probability of 7.5% 400 units with a probability of 5% 500 units with a probability of 2.5%arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:Cengage,
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning