simulation - mallory abbitt

pdf

School

University of Alabama *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

300

Subject

Management

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

1

Uploaded by ChefDove3716

Report
For the simulation, I chose the justice framework, which is the most fair and impartial way to interact with a group of people. In scenario 1, I was asked to fire one person and then reward someone with a vacation. The person that I fired was Yuliya because she has not been with the company as long as the others and has accessed unauthorized customer information out of her own boredom, which is a breach of privacy and ethics. For the vacation, James was chosen because of his hard work and loyalty through his cancer diagnosis, as well as his contributions towards spotting a mistake that could have cost the company over $5 million if went unnoticed. My decisions relate to the justice framework because I remained impartial and only looked at the facts when deciding. In scenario 2, I was asked to give my input as to how the company should go about their top salesperson, who was promoted to manager, performing poorly, and the new district manager, who cannot help her. I decided it would be best to work with the two of them and ensure that they receive proper training to go about their jobs because it is on HR that training was not conducted to begin with. The justice framework aligns with my decision because I remained fair to both employees and sought to find solutions to the issues HR has caused. In scenario 3, at first, I chose to just work with HR and figure out a way to offer Alex a shortened work week that would not be unfair to him and other employees, which aligns with the justice framework; however, I changed my answer when I was asked to consider how his absence affects productivity and getting the job done. I then chose to renegotiate Alex’s job to change his duties to those that would not affect other employees so much if he was gone to remain fair to all employees. I chose to not fire him because that would be against the disability act and would not provide justice. In scenario 4, after an employee (Kiana) disclosed another employee (Edith) was bullying her and an additional employee (Michael) is a witness, I chose to talk to Michael to get more input before approaching Edith. After receiving his side, I chose to talk to Edith and address my concerns, then write her up for the incident once instead of twice to avoid her being subjected to a mandatory review and being fired. I then chose to provide Kiana with more support and reward Michael for helping. The justice framework can be applied to my decision because I remained impartial and fair to all employees. I took Kiana’s concern seriously, and I received all of the facts before addressing the issue and writing Edith up once instead of twice since it was her first offense in 8 years to ever happen.
Discover more documents: Sign up today!
Unlock a world of knowledge! Explore tailored content for a richer learning experience. Here's what you'll get:
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help