PADM 700 Discussion Module 3 Reply 1

.docx

School

Liberty University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

700

Subject

Management

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

3

Uploaded by jusabigamer

Report
Currently in the world, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is prominent in business and among social media users. With the use of AI, governance over the usage of AI is a hot topic and the ethical challenges it faces with covering privacy and the proper way to use AI. With the use of AI users are caught in the dilemma of being protected and how it affects the decision-making process among leaders within an organization. (Leikas, Johri, Latvanen, Wessberg, & Hahto, 2022) AI usage is increasingly popular in the private sector of the world due to multiple stakeholders but is slowly stepping into the public sector. In the public sector the challenge is writing the rules and laws to govern AI and how the public will use AI. AI guidelines must coincide with moral code and the existence of deciding what’s right and wrong. Public administrators must investigate protecting the rights of citizens and through experimentation respecting the behavior of people, ensuring appropriate behavior between AI and the user. (O'Reilly, 2014) Administrators must ensure policy is written to avoid any unfair practices become habitual, quality of standards for AI, and laws are written where people in society cannot take advantage of other people. “When there is no clear prophetic vision, people quickly wander astray.” (Proverbs 29:18) AI provides help in the streamline of workflow processes and the improvement of automated financial systems. The issue at hand is the management of AI and how the manager controls input and output of certain algorithms for AI. (Wirtz, Weyerer, & Sturm, 2020) Managers influence the human part of AI by helping employees understand the proper way of using AI and letting employees oversee the day-to-day tasks of AI usage. Employees need clear understanding from leaders in how to apply proper techniques to better aid end users. Users like when employees have a clear understanding of programs and are transparent in how the program helps them in their part of the world. Administrators need to look at all aspects of training for the organization in different events where AI finds a good outcome. Organizations must look at the covenant between them and their consumers. AI development must account for the output of their practices among stakeholders and customers. Stakeholders ensure the longevity of the
organization and AI is a technology that will change daily and often. Organizational employees need proper guidance and reward on developing techniques to increase AI usage, but employees must push the proper ways of using these new techniques for customers from leadership. (Fischer, 2010) AI in public administration must understand the reality of public service, public service is the need of the public and bettering the community it serves. Response: Artificial intelligence is currently at the height of its popularity in our society and watching its rise has been a revolutionary experience. I whole-heartedly agree with you on there needing to be sufficient laws and regulations to govern how the public can and cannot verses should and should not use AI. Too often when something not understood comes out or makes a breakthrough, there is a lot of focus from the public on negative outputs it can have (Fischer, 2010). While this is necessary and understood, the educated warning seem to do little to effectively warn or subdue the general public from using these new tools responsibly, ethically, or even morally (Shafritz, and Hyde, 2016). A different way of trying to steer people’s ways of abusing a moral or ethical code while using AI would be to pour time into pointing out the positive ways AI can be used by the public alike. An article by Rudy van Belkom does a good job of this by showcasing how powerfully beneficial AI can be in many fields; although she focuses on the futuristics field (2020). While this is one example, there are many ways that AI can be promoted that do not cross ethical lines. It is my personal opinion that AI shouldn’t be used for discretional or creative matters. For instance, I think AI is great for fields that are heavily led by science, math, and other analytical fields. However, there are many fields that require discretion for a reason and when that is forgotten, aspects can fall through the cracks easily. Furthermore, I find it stripping of personality that God gave to each of us to use AI for any creative matters. There is need
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help