Assessment 1 – Questioning – Written Assessment_AURETR130-converted

.pdf

School

Aibt International Institute of Americas-Val *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

OTHER

Subject

Mechanical Engineering

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

Uploaded by lucaszanevich

Student Book Written Assessment AURETR130 Diagnose and repair starting systems

AURETR130 Diagnose and repair starting systems Assessment 1 – Questioning – Written Assessment – AURETR130 Version: 2.0 Created: May 2021 Page 2 of 33 Assessment 1 – Questioning – Written Assessment Student Name Lucas Santana Davi Student ID Number 9364 Unit Start Date 05/08/2021 Unit End Date 25/08/2021 Assessment Due Date 25/08/2021 Date Submitted 24/08/2021 This cover sheet is to be completed by the student and assessor and used as a record to determine student competency in this assessment task The assessment process and tasks were fully explained. Yes / No I am aware of which evidence will be collected and how. Yes / No I am aware of my right to appeal an assessment decision. Yes / No I am aware that I can locate the AIBT’s Complaints and Appeals Policy and Procedure on their website at https://aibtglobal.edu.au/ Yes / No I have discussed any additional educational support or reasonable adjustments I require in order to undertake this assessment with the Student Support Services Officer and Trainer / Assessor, (if applicable). e.g. Student Handbook and Access and Equity Policy https://aibtglobal.edu.au/ Yes / No I have access to all required resources? Yes / No Cheating & Plagiarism Declaration Student Declaration: In accordance with the AIBT’s Academic Misconduct Policy , I hereby acknowledge by signing this declaration that I have not cheated or plagiarised any work regarding the assessment tasks undertaken in this unit of competency except where the work has been correctly acknowledged. NOTE: Student must sign this prior to submitting their assessments to the assessor Signature Lucas Santana Davi Date: 24/08/2021 Assessment Results Satisfactory or Not Yet Satisfactory (Please circle or highlight the assessment result for this task) Feedback to Student - Please provide general feedback on the Student’s performance Student Declaration: - I verify that the work completed is my own and that I was adequately informed of the assessment process prior to commencing this assessment task. Assessor Declaration: - I verify that I have adequately explained and negotiated the assessment tasks with the student prior to commencing assessment. Student Signature Lucas Santana Davi Assessor Signature Date 24/08/2021 Date

AURETR130 Diagnose and repair starting systems Assessment 1 – Questioning – Written Assessment – AURETR130 Version: 2.0 Created: May 2021 Page 3 of 33 Context and Conditions of Assessment This assessment will ensure that the elements, performance criteria, performance evidence and knowledge evidence required and conditions are adhered to demonstrate competency in this unit assessment task. • Read the assessment carefully before commencing. • This is an open book assessment and will be conducted at your designated campus / workshop / specialised lab. • Your Assessor will use the assessment criteria in this document and will provide feedback / comment. • You must answer all the questions in the assessment tasks in your own words and own handwriting. • Your Trainer / Assessor will inform you of the due date for this assessment task. • Your Assessor will grade as either S – Satisfactory or NS – Not Satisfactory for the assessment. In all cases your Assessor will provide you with feedback. • Only when all assessment tasks have been graded as S – Satisfactory you will be deemed C – Competent in the final result of the unit of competency; if you do not satisfactorily complete all the assessment tasks you will be deemed NYC – Not Yet Competent. Re-Assessment Conditions • If the evidence is graded as NS – Not Satisfactory you will be required to re-submit the evidence. In this case, you will be provided with clear and constructive feedback based on the assessment decision so that they can improve your skills / knowledge prior to reassessment. • Where a ‘NS – Not Satisfactory’ judgement is made, you will be given guidance on steps to take to improve your performance and provided the opportunity to resubmit evidence to demonstrate competence. The assessor will determine and discuss the reasons for NS – Not satisfactory on any of the criteria and will assess you through a different method of assessment e.g. verbal/oral questioning, problem solving exercises. • You will be notified between 10-30 working days of undertaking an assessment of their result in achieving competency o If a student does not complete the assessment, they should notify their trainer as to why they did not complete the assessment and if due to illness, a medical certificate must be produced. o In the above scenario, student will be given an opportunity for reassessment within 5 working days with no reassessment fee charged. o Students who are deemed to be Not Yet Competent (NYC) will be provided with information identifying the areas in which they failed to achieve competency. Students will then have the opportunity to repeat the assessment task within 5 working days of notification with no reassessment fee charged. o If a student is deemed NYC in the reassessment or if the student did not approach the AIBT’s within five working days with a valid reason for not availing themselves of the reassessment opportunity, then those students will be given a final chance to re-sit the assessment and will be charged a reassessment fee as per AIBT rule. o After this no further reassessment attempt will be provided to the student and the student will be required to repeat the whole unit with full fee for the unit. The student will be made aware of the impact of repeating the unit may have on their student visa. o If a student is found to be cheating or plagiarising their assessment, a reassessment fee will be charged for reassessing the assessment within 5 working days. o If the student is found to be plagiarising or cheating again after conclusion of the Intervention meeting with the Course Co-ordinator, the matter will be referred to the Academic Management Committee which may result in the suspension or cancellation of their enrolment o AIBT’s has intervention strategies, including student support services available to enable students to complete qualification in the expected time frame. Students at risk of not completing within this time frame are identified as early as possible and an intervention strategy is put in place. AIBT will ensure access to: • automotive repair workplace or simulated workplace • workplace instructions • manufacturer specifications for vehicle, vessel or machinery starting systems • two different vehicles, vessels or machinery with starting system faults

AURETR130 Diagnose and repair starting systems Assessment 1 – Questioning – Written Assessment – AURETR130 Version: 2.0 Created: May 2021 Page 4 of 33 • diagnostic equipment for vehicle, vessel or machinery starting systems, including multimeter • tools, equipment and materials appropriate for repairing vehicle, vessel or machinery starting systems. Evidence to be submitted by the student: - Completed written responses to the questions in the assessment task Assessment Decision Making Rules Your assessor will assess the evidence submitted for the following elements, performance criteria, performance evidence and knowledge evidence to confirm that the student evidence submitted demonstrates validity, sufficiency, authenticity and confirms current skills and knowledge relevant to the unit of competency. Your assessor will be looking for the following in this assessment task: - • work health and safety (WHS) and occupational health and safety (OHS) requirements, including procedures for: o using specialised tools and equipment o using appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) o identifying hazards and controlling risks associated with: − working on high voltage ignition systems − wearing jewellery while working around high current wiring systems • operating principles of starting systems and associated components, including: o producing movement due to the force between magnetic fields o producing magnetic fields due to current flow through conductors o basic direct current motor operation, including simple armature, magnetic field and commutator • application, purpose and operation of starting systems and components, including: o starter motors, including: − internal component function and operation, including armature, commutator, field windings − starter motor windings, including series wound, shunt wound and compound wound − permanent magnet starter motors − direct drive and reduction-type starter motors o starting electrical systems, including: − solenoids − shift levers − overrunning clutch flywheel ring gears − ignition switching, including key start, push-button start, remote start and start-stop systems − safety switches, including inhibitor switches and clutch neutral switches • diagnostic testing procedures for starting systems, including: o accessing and interpreting scan tool system data, including: − diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs) − live data − freeze frame data − waveforms o using diagnostic flow charts o testing electrical systems, including procedures for: − accessing electrical terminals and using test probes without damaging connectors, fuse holders or wiring − resistance, current flow and voltage drop checks of starting system circuits − field winding tests − armature tests, including using a growler − commutator tests − brushes and holder tests − overrunning clutch and pinion tests − flywheel ring gear tests

AURETR130 Diagnose and repair starting systems Assessment 1 – Questioning – Written Assessment – AURETR130 Version: 2.0 Created: May 2021 Page 5 of 33 − starter motor bench tester operation • repair procedures for starting systems, including: o tightening connections o replacing faulty or damaged cable connections o removing and replacing faulty or damaged components • post-repair testing procedures for starting systems, including: o DTC clearing procedures o checking for electrical connector mating o static and dynamic performance tests of starting systems.

AURETR130 Diagnose and repair starting systems Assessment 1 – Questioning – Written Assessment – AURETR130 Version: 2.0 Created: May 2021 Page 6 of 33 Assessment 1 – Questioning Written Assessment 1 Why should you NEVER use a test-light to diagnose components and wires in computer systems? The current draw might damage the electronic/computer system component 2 NEVER use a test light to probe for power in an electronic circuit. The system and the components maybe damage by the increased current draw of the test light 3 You should NEVER connect a ‘self - powered’ test -light to a circuit that is powered. Why? Because the test light might be damaged 4 Analogue meter cannot be used on a computer-controller circuit unless expressly directed to do so in the workshop manual. Why? It might result in serious damage on the computer or in the circuit 5. Explain why the leads of an ammeter should NEVER be place the across the battery or a load. Never because the meter will be in parallel with the circuit causing a blown fuse in the ammeter or worst case scenario, destroying it completely

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version