Final Paper- PHIL

.docx

School

Porterville College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

107

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Oct 30, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by BaronStarRook7326

Fernando Palacios Final Paper PHIL 106 Justice There has always been discussions and debates about the law and when is it ok to break them. Some people believe that it is never ok to break the law while others believe that there are certain laws that can be broken. Socrates and Martin Luther King Jr. both had arguments on this topic, but they were different views from each other. Socrates argued that it is never ok to break the law under any circumstance and MLK argued that it was right to break laws that brought upon injustices to people. In “Crito” by Plato, Plato recalls the conversation Crito and Socrates had while Socrates was in prison. Socrates was found guilty of trying to corrupt the youth and promote atheism. He defended himself and although it seemed like his arguments were convincing enough to find him innocent, the jury found him guilty and sentenced him to death (Apology). While Socrates was in prison waiting for his sentenced to be carried out, Crito got in and told Socrates he was there to help him escape prison. Socrates refused and said to Crito that he would rather stay in jail and take responsibility for his crime, even if he believes that he is innocent. When asked why, Socrates responded by saying that it is never ok to break the law. Socrates’ main reasoning behind his choice is because he is a citizen of Athens. Socrates goes on to explain that while every Athenian has the right to be raised and taught in Athena, they also have right to leave the city whenever they desire if they wish to not stay anymore without hassle. Those who do

decide to stay have entered what Socrates calls an “implied contract” (Socrates- “Crito”). This contract means that every Athenian must do as they are told when commanded. Those who do not follow and are found guilty after having the chance to convince the people they are in the right, are punished like Socrates was. Socrates explains that although he did not break the law to deserve his punishment, escaping prison would then be breaking the law and then he would be in the wrong. He believes in the just laws and would rather accept his punishment then actually break the law. (“Crito”) Martin Luther King Jr. had a different opinion on breaking laws. MLK believed that there were two different types of laws, just and unjust laws. In his “Letter from Birmingham Jail” MLK describes just laws as laws that have morals and he referred to them as “the law of God” and we are responsible to follow those laws. He described unjust laws as not being laws at all but just created to degrade people and break peace. MLK fought very hard during the civil rights movement where there were many unjust laws. These laws included segregation which brought upon inequality to minorities and chaos between people in the United States. MLK did not argue to break laws just to break them, he argued that there was meaning in breaking unjust laws. MLK believed that by breaking unjust laws, it would bring a message to the people about the injustices these types of laws bring. He makes it very clear in his letter that he is not advocating for nonsense violence and that those who do decide to break unjust laws to help the cause, must be ready to face any consequences that may follow as he says that by doing this is actually showing the most respect for the law. MLK did believe in breaking

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version