PHIL Paper 3

.docx

School

Lone Star College System, Woodlands *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1301

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

4

Uploaded by GeneralDangerBuffalo20

Report
Ethical Theory AbbySue Campbell Prof. Tran-Hoang Phil 1301 May 4, 2022 Ethical Theory An analysis of three significant ethical theories will lead me to my opinion on which is the most promising for modern society to embrace. My analysis will look at each theory’s reaction to a specific scenario. The scenario is Autopia is the world’s leading self-driving technology firm. The technology used by Autopia's self-driving cars is the safest, but some accidents can't be prevented. As an example, there will be situations where an Autopia car has to choose between running over one individual or ten individuals. Imagine that you were the head of the philosophy department at Autopia. Furthermore, suppose you were asked to provide feedback on Autopia's software engineers on how cars should respond in situations like the one you just described. First, I will look at the Utilitarian view. Next, I will look at the Kantian theory. Then I will review Aristotle’s Virtue ethics. Lastly, I will review the notion of a combination of all three theories. Utilitarianism is essentially doing what will cause the most pleasure or happiness in the situation. The idea is that the outcome of an action determines whether the action is moral or not. Knowing this the Autopia car would veer towards the single man rather than the group of ten people. Utilitarianism would dictate that the most happiness created is the moral choice because only one man would die in the scenario rather than ten. This theory is extremely cut and dry. There is no wiggle room to make decisions about the quality of
Ethical Theory the people involved. I am not a fan of utilitarianism. There are exceptions to every situation and utilitarianism waits to decide if what one does is ethical by waiting for the outcome. Even John Stuart Mill assesses that happiness cannot be fully experienced without the understanding of disappointment and despair (792). He explains this in the quote, “It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied. And if the fool or pig are of a different opinion, it is because they only know their own side of the question. The other party to the comparison knows both sides.” (792). Kantian Theory is very clear on how to proceed in the Autopia scenario. Do nothing and let autopilot car careen into the group of ten people. Kant advocates not sacrificing one life to save another. The categorical imperative says that intentions are an important aspect of deciding to do something. Kantian Theory disregards consequences as meaningless when assessing morality. Because of this, Kant believes you should only be held accountable for the outcomes of your actions, not the consequences of them. It is necessary to have a morally righteous will for one to be regarded as good will. Insofar as one has a good will, virtue, success, fortune, and happiness can be deemed desirable or even desirable. A good character is valuable by itself. Doing good is worthwhile as a goal in and of itself. To quote Kant, “It is necessary to have a morally righteous will for one to be regarded as good will. Insofar as one has a good will, virtue, success, fortune, and happiness can be deemed desirable or even desirable. A good character is valuable by itself. Doing good is worthwhile as a goal in and of itself.” (116). Applying Aristotle’s Virtue Theory to the Autopia scenario would involve how the individual is developing the best person they can be in multiple ideals of their life. These
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help