Document1 (1)
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Liberty University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
MISC
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
4
Uploaded by ProfessorCrown12748
a. The article clearly presents two contrasting viewpoints - that of the evolutionist and the creationist - when it comes to interpreting the formation of the Grand Canyon. The author provides a clear explanation of both perspectives, allowing readers to understand the different paradigms and assumptions each viewpoint is based on.
b. The author presents their arguments in a convincing manner by using historical and biblical references
to support the creationist viewpoint. By referencing Scripture and citing passages from Genesis and Peter's writings, the author appeals to those who hold religious beliefs and may find comfort in aligning scientific interpretations with their faith.
c. The topic of how the Grand Canyon was formed is significant as it touches upon larger debates between science and religion. It addresses fundamental questions about the origins of Earth and human existence, which have implications for individuals' worldviews and belief systems.
d. While no specific figures are mentioned in this excerpt, it is worth noting that the presence of fossilized marine organisms within sandstone, limestone, and shale strata can be seen as evidence supporting the idea of a global flood.
Overall, this article presents a clear explanation of two opposing viewpoints regarding the formation of the Grand Canyon and provides historical and biblical arguments to support the creationist perspective. It addresses a significant topic that has implications for individuals' beliefs about Earth's history and origins.
A YOUNGER CREATION
The weaknesses of the article include several assumptions made by the author, potential factual errors, and a lack of clarity in presenting the case.
a. The author assumes that geologists generally reject the explanation of the Grand Canyon being formed by a through-flowing river over tens of millions of years. However, no evidence or sources are provided to support this claim, making it an unsubstantiated assumption.
b. There is a potential factual error in the statement that the deposits on the western side of the Grand Canyon are of the wrong character to argue for a long-enduring river. Without specific details or supporting evidence, it is unclear what exactly is meant by "wrong character" and whether it accurately represents geological findings.
c. The author could have stated their case better by providing more evidence and explanations to support their claims regarding alternative theories for the formation of the Grand Canyon. They mention silt deposits and lakes at higher elevations but do not provide sufficient information or references to make these arguments convincing.
d. No figures were used in this particular excerpt, so there are no figures contributing to the article's weaknesses.
It should be noted that without access to the full article and further context, it is difficult to fully assess its weaknesses
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Part 1 Was there a figure used that supports the article’s strengths?