educ2900_assignment,deafculture_hanahiromitsu

.docx

School

Saint Louis Community College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

2900

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by GeneralCheetahMaster781

1. Do you agree with the couple in choosing to have a deaf baby? Why or why not? First, before providing my answer, I believe it is crucial to acknowledge that situations like this are deeply personal and sensitive. I am not hearing impaired, and I am not extremely well-educated on the community or culture, aside from what I have learned this week and the sparse bits of information I have acquired throughout my life about deafness. That being said, I think, for the most part, I would have to say that I find it unethical to intentionally manipulate the traits or anatomy of a child before they are born. Would we allow a couple to choose the sex of their child, or the sexual orientation of a child if they were able? Deliberately choosing to have a child with a specific trait, such as deafness, raises different ethical questions. It introduces considerations about the well-being of the child, the societal implications, and the ethical boundaries of using biotechnology to intentionally design certain traits. Like I said previously, this is clearly a very complex issue that can be viewed through many diverse lenses. For instance, the couple mentioned in the article was a lesbian couple, assuming they are both biological AFAB women, they are unable to biologically have a child together. The use of donor gametes or other reproductive assistance methods is a way for them to become parents. This scenario raises questions about inclusivity, equal access to reproductive technologies, and the recognition of diverse family structures. Ensuring that individuals and couples have the ability to build families in ways that are meaningful to them is an important aspect of reproductive rights. 2. Is it important to distinguish between the “small” d and “big” D? Why or why not?

Yes, distinguishing between the small d and big D is important because it acknowledges and respects the diversity of experiences within the deaf community. It recognizes that deafness is not solely a medical condition but also a cultural and linguistic identity. Using the appropriate terminology reflects an understanding and appreciation for the rich and diverse aspects of the Deaf community. Those who identify as "Deaf" with a capital D typically see their deafness as a unique cultural and linguistic experience. They may use sign language as their primary mode of communication and may feel a strong connection to the Deaf community. For many in the Deaf community, being Deaf is not viewed as a disability but as a distinct way of being with its own language, traditions, and values. It is also a way to distinguish the experiences of those who became deaf later in life. These individuals may have grown up in the hearing world, developed spoken language skills, and then experienced a significant hearing loss later in life. Their experiences and perspectives may differ from those who were born deaf or became deaf at an early age. Some may embrace the cultural and linguistic aspects of the Deaf community, while others may see their experience primarily through a medical or audiological lens, and hence may use “deaf” with a little d.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help