abcdbdij

.pdf

School

Bellevue University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

234

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

pdf

Pages

4

Uploaded by BrigadierDanger12223

Report
Philosophers and Kings & Primary Sources Use the documents provided in class to answer the questions below. Type your answers on the right side of the table. The box will grow as you add more text. You may not know all the answers to some of the more rote questions because we may not have addressed it. It's okay to look them up. However, the deeper questions need to be your own thoughts and words. 6 points each. Document 1 The Enlightenment also produced new ideas about society and government. One example of this is Leviathan , a book by Englishman Thomas Hobbes published in the 1600s. What do you know about it and its importance? Thoughts on society and its proper governance underwent substantial changes throughout the Enlightenment. It sought to supplant conventional wisdom with a logical analysis of the best type of government. In the seventeenth century, the concept of the "divine right of kings" served as a rationale for the establishment of dominant European kingdoms. But in "Leviathan," the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes made the case for "absolute monarchy" as the only reasonable outcome of a perfectly rational interpretation of human nature and natural rights. Hobbes believed that in order to protect people's rights and property, there had to be an all-powerful state because humanity was inherently violent and chaotic. Leviathan backs the idea generally of an all-powerful ruler as the head of any government. How do the details of this book’s cover reveal this point of view? In terms of the book cover for "Leviathan," it graphically represents this viewpoint with an arresting picture of a Leviathan, signifying the necessity of a powerful and authoritative government to regulate and control the innate aggressiveness and self-interest present in human nature. In the 1600s, many European monarchs were increasing their power. They often claimed a right to rule by “divine right.” What did this term mean? Monarchs in Europe who asserted the "divine right" in the 1600s felt that their power to rule was mandated by God, giving their reign religious justification. But Hobbes did not base his views on religious ideas such as the “divine right of kings.” He based them, he believed, on reason alone. That is, his reason told him human nature is basically selfish and aggressive. Therefore, only an all-powerful ruler can protect men’s rights and security. Do you think this view is logical based solely on “reason”? Why or why not? Thomas Hobbes rejected theological foundations, such as "divine right of kings," and based his beliefs only on reason. He felt that human nature was intrinsically selfish and aggressive. As a result, he contended that an all-powerful ruler was required to preserve individuals' rights and security. It is debatable if this viewpoint is reasonable and based exclusively on reason. Hobbes' viewpoint is logical in its premise that a strong central authority can avert the chaos that can result from human selfishness and hostility. However, detractors claim that it oversimplifies human nature and ignores the possibility of such a ruler abusing power. D0cument 2 Enlightenment ideas soon became popular with many aristocrats and other wealthy people, as well as several kings and queens. Illustration 2A shows Prussia
one such king, Frederick II (or Frederick the Great), in his library with a friend. What nation did Frederick lead? (country name only) Monarchs such as Frederick came to be called “enlightened despots.” Can you name others who were given this title? Why do you think Enlightenment ideas appealed to such monarchs? Other prominent recipients of this title are Joseph II of Austria and Catherine the Great of Russia. These kings were drawn to enlightenment principles because they thought they would solidify their authority and bring their countries up to date. Aristocrats came to respect certain philosophes, a group of powerful Enlightenment intellectuals who were frequently courted by kings. In Illustration 2B, what appears to be happening? Several aristocrats have gathered specifically to discuss Enlightenment ideas. What were these gatherings called? Sometimes key thinkers like Voltaire, called philosophes, would be invited to such gatherings. Who were some other philosophes? How do both illustrations make clear who Enlightenment ideas appealed to? Some find this surprising—why? Why do you think so many wealthy, powerful people were attracted to Enlightenment ideals? Illustration 2B shows one such salon. These assemblies o±ered a forum for the discussion of ideas, and sometimes prominent intellectuals, known as philosophers like Voltaire, were invited. Document 3 Enlightenment thinkers asked many questions about society. But they rarely agreed on the answers. John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau did agree that government exists to protect individual rights. But they di±ered in many ways—as they do here on the value of representative government. Explain what “representative government” is and how the two men di±ered over it. "Representative government" is a system where citizens elect individuals to act as their representatives in decision-making processes, essentially delegating the authority to make laws and policies on their behalf. These representatives are expected to reflect the will and interests of the people who elected them. The key di±erence between Locke and Rousseau regarding representative government lies in their views on how the people's will is best expressed and protected. Locke saw elected representatives as a means to safeguard individual rights and ensure a just and balanced government. Rousseau, on the other hand, argued for direct democracy, asserting that true liberty and the common good could only be achieved through direct involvement and decision-making by the citizens themselves. One of these two men had a huge influence on the founders of the U.S. government. Which one? Why do you think America’s founders were influenced more by him than by the other? John Locke had a more significant influence on the founders of the U.S. government compared to Jean-Jacques Rousseau. This influence can be attributed to the philosophical alignment of Locke's ideas with the principles of the American Revolution and the formation of the United States. Locke's emphasis on natural rights, property, and the government's role in protecting individual liberties closely resonated with the American colonists. His social contract theory provided a theoretical framework justifying the American colonies' quest for independence and the establishment of a
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help