ethics

.docx

School

Miami Dade College, Miami *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

2604

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by DeaconArtOstrich37

Yago dubouloz Miranda ESSAY Ethical theories give perspectives for evaluating what is good and wrong, as well as guidance on moral decision-making. Consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics are three major ethical systems that allow us to see and guide us through moral theories. In this essay we will discuss the fundamentals of each theory, how they define values, and how they compare in terms of success. Consequentialism. Consequentialism holds that the morality of an action is completely decided by its consequences. The most frequent type, utilitarianism, holds that the proper behavior increases general happiness or eliminates suffering. Consequentialist ideas stress the importance of outcomes above intentions or underlying character. Critics say that this method can legitimize ethically problematic behaviors if they result in favorable benefits. Consequentialism's success hinges on the capacity to properly forecast outcomes. Deontology. In contrast, deontology is concerned with the underlying essence of acts rather than their outcomes. Immanuel Kant's categorical imperative is a basic deontological idea, arguing that an action is morally correct if it can be applied universally without contradiction. Deontological ethics promotes principles and responsibilities while stressing moral obligations and norms. While deontology gives clear and absolute norms, detractors claim that it promotes moral rigidity

and fails to account for the complexities of particular situations. The effectiveness of deontology stems on its adherence to moral principles, although it may struggle in situations when rules clash or are impracticable. Virtue Ethics. Virtue ethics, based on Aristotle's theories, emphasizes the development of virtuous character attributes. Compared to consequentialism and deontology, virtue ethics is more Concerned with the type of person one should become rather than specific behaviors or results. Virtue ethicists believe that acquiring qualities such as bravery, honesty, and compassion leads to ethically correct behavior. Critics argue that virtue ethics does not provide clear decision-making criteria and may be culturally biased. However, its emphasis on character development offers a comprehensive and adaptable approach to morality, accounting for the subtleties of varied situations. Comparative Analysis. Comparing these ethical views highlights their strengths and weaknesses. Consequentialism is useful because it is simple and adaptable, yet it may struggle to properly foresee long-term implications. Deontology's dedication to moral principles is admirable, yet its rigidity can be ineffective in complex situations. While virtue ethics emphasizes character development, it may not provide clear advice for specific behaviors. The nature of the moral

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help