2
The Terri Schiavo Case
The Terri Schiavo case was a high-profile right-to-life and right-to-death dispute in the
United States in the early 2000s revolving around Terri Schiavo, a woman who suffered a
cardiac arrest in 1990 and was left in a persistent vegetative state (Nora, 2020). The patient's
husband, Michael Schiavo, believed that she would not have wanted to be kept alive in such a
state and sought to remove her feeding tube so that she would pass away naturally. Terri's
parents, on the other hand, Bob and Mary Schindler, held the view that Terri was not in a
persistent vegetative state and could recover with proper medical treatment and believed that
removing her feeding tube was equivalent to actively ending her life and went to court to prevent
it from being removed. This case raised critical bioethical issues concerning the right to life,
patient autonomy, the definition of death, and the state's role in end-of-life decision-making.
Intense debates, legal battles, political intervention, and media scrutiny also marked it. Numerous
courts and appeals heard Terri Schiavo's case, leading to a series of legal decisions, court orders,
and legislative actions. Despite several attempts to intervene by state and federal governments,
the courts ultimately ruled in favor of removing Terri's feeding tube, and she passed away on
March 31, 2005.
Bioethical Analysis
The bioethical issue in the Terri Schiavo case was whether or not to continue providing
life support to a person who could no longer make decisions for themselves and had no chance of
recovery (Nora, 2020). Terri's family was divided on the issue, with her husband advocating for
removing life support and her parents advocating for keeping her on life support. A key issue, in
this case, was the question of who had the authority to make end-of-life decisions on behalf of
Terri Schiavo. On the one hand, Terri's husband argued that he had the right to make the decision
