ans 2

.docx

School

Seneca College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

855

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

1

Uploaded by AgentElectronWaterBuffalo35

Report
Q2: Discuss the purpose of Human Rights legislation and its importance for workers. Since human rights is the source of the complaint, indicate which prohibited ground the individual is challenging and make the connection (five points) Ans2. The purpose of Human rights legislation is to make sure everyone is treated fairly and without discrimination, especially at work. They aim to protect people's dignity and rights, creating a society where everyone is treated equally. These laws state that discrimination is prohibited based on certain things, and if that happens, people can take the matter to the Human Rights Tribunal for a fair solution. In Adam Knauff's case, these Human Rights laws are important because he believes his rights were not respected by his employer, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. Knauff says his rights were violated because of his strong beliefs, known as his "creed", which is protected under these laws. The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario broadened the meaning of creed in 2015 to cover not just religious beliefs but also non-religious ones. Knauff argues that his ethical vegan lifestyle, which goes beyond just what he eats, is a sincere and important belief, or creed. So, he is using these laws to stand up for his right to be treated fairly and to challenge what he sees as unfair treatment because of his veganism during his work in 2017. The prohibited ground that Knauff is challenging is creed, a category protected by the Human Rights Code. Creed includes both religious and non-religious beliefs, and Knauff says his ethical veganism fits into this group. The purpose of these Human Rights laws is to help people like Knauff seek justice when they feel their rights have been ignored because of things protected by the law. The link between Human Rights laws and Knauff's complaint is that he believes his employer failed to accommodate his sincerely held ethical beliefs, i.e., veganism when he was working away from home. By claiming discrimination and rights violations, Knauff is using these laws to address what he sees as unfair treatment at his workplace. In conclusion, Human Rights laws are there to stop discrimination, and in Knauff's situation, he is challenging his conduct on the prohibited ground of creed, specifically his ethical veganism.
Discover more documents: Sign up today!
Unlock a world of knowledge! Explore tailored content for a richer learning experience. Here's what you'll get:
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help