Settler Colonialism Seminar Group 24
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Guelph *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
2080
Subject
Political Science
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by LieutenantInternet12459
1
Settler Colonialism, Indigenous Rights,
Management and Governance
Readings:
Episode 10: treaty relations and environmental politics in Canada
In Defense of Our Treaties YouTube video
Question 1:
what settler colonialism is – identify as many characteristics of settler colonialism as possible
Constant assimilation of Indigenous peoples – still ongoing
o
No political rights – having no worth
Colonial processes have exploited all inhabitants of Canada – including people, plants, and animals
Taking forever to prove treaty rights – underlying racism in government
o
Relationship with regulations benefits government
o
Undermined treaty rights – what is the political economy (neocapitalism)
Populations within developed countries
o
Demographics in Canada – colonialism is reinventing itself continuously
Political economy is intertwined in colonialism
Difficult to separate colonial thinking from treaty rights
o
To fish or not to fish
Industries keeping groups separate to stop unionization
o
Keeping Indigenous communities separate to remove their power
o
Exclusion from industry
Economic systems being imposed on Indigenous communities
o
Aren’t viable for Indigenous communities due to access of resources, technology, location
o
Large scale production regulations don’t really apply to them??
o
Climate change and displacement of peoples due to neoliberal development that ignores marginalized
communities
Settler colonialism: assimilation – erasing other cultures that are deemed to be less than their own
Question 2:
how does settler colonialism influence and shape the fisheries governance regime – at least 2 significant
examples
Example 1: underlying racism in policy
o
Having to continuously prove treaty rights
o
Being constantly pressured to assimilate into society
o
Only allowed to participate in either a food fishery (for community consumption only) or a commercial
fishery (merchant – need to abide by Canadian laws)
Why can’t they do both?
Can they make a living from fisheries?
o
Racism and backlash from communities
o
Choosing between traditional values and Canadian policies
Government stole the power – try to appear as if they care
Example 2: internalization of colonialism
o
Only using colonial policies
o
Forgetting traditions – continued colonialism
2
o
Non-Indigenous communities force this – privatization
Settler colonialism controls the input and output of the industry
The continued control over indigenous communities
Treating the indigenous fisheries like they were the problem in the first place
Don’t have an exploitive economy
Question 3:
what role the treaties play relative to how the lobster fishery is governed – at least 2 examples
Example 1: peace and friendship treaties – the right to hunt and fish
o
Codifying the traditional rights of Indigenous peoples
o
If respected – can be used to fight colonialism/corruption for the right to use land (land use rights)
Want to be protected – but the treaties aren’t respected by locals/government
o
Need to defend treaties and keep them recognized
o
Treaties were negotiated in an indigenous context as well – we have obligations to them as well
o
Treaties are seen as secondary in court
‘Criminal case’ instead of ‘treaty rights case’
Not negotiating treaty rights – seen as criminals under law – underlying colonialism
o
Negotiations can endanger treaty rights
o
Treaty rights negotiations are for nature-based resources
Male dominated sectors – excludes Indigenous women
Indigenous women taking the lead in environmental conservation
Example 2: wanting to exercise treaty rights
o
Seen as breaking the law
Government ignores treaty rights as long as possible
Indigenous people are attacked by local fishing companies, police, government (DFO)
o
Getting assaulted by other communities and government
DFO wanted to assimilate all communities
Removes all traditional values
Martial agreements – reduces treaty rights
o
Looking for support from non-native community
Question 4.1:
what kind of alignments are reflected in this example of the lobster fishery?
Institutional alignments: DFO
o
Parameters are set by government – profit driven
o
Wanted to negotiate during the final hours of court case
o
Wanting to privatize and continue mega-development for production
o
Short term profits over long term stability
Government alignments
o
Wants money
o
Wants to control indigenous communities through uniform regulations
Local alignments
o
Local non-indigenous community: if privatization pressures increase, it becomes profit driven
o
Conservation of environment
o
Indigenous communities occupying traditional territories outside of reserves
Asserting sovereignty
o
Bay of Fundy fishing conservatory – didn’t go to DFO
Super easy
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help