gov1.6pt2.edited
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
El Paso Community College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
2305
Subject
Political Science
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
4
Uploaded by HighnessGalaxyReindeer45
1. Michael Moore asserts that there exists a dominant mentality of violence in the United States. Name some examples from American culture that support this assertion.
Michael Moore's assertion about the existence of a dominant mentality of violence in the United States is a subjective interpretation of American culture, and opinions may vary on the extent to which it holds. However, some examples from American culture that could be cited to support this assertion include:
1.
Gun Culture: The prevalence of firearms in American society and the prominence of gun ownership as a symbol of individual freedom and self-defense contribute to a perception of a culture that is deeply intertwined with violence. The high rates of gun violence, mass
shootings, and debates over gun control laws further underscore the complex relationship between Americans and guns.
2.
Entertainment Industry: American movies, television shows, video games, and other forms of media often depict graphic violence as a central theme or plot device. Action movies, crime dramas, and first-person shooter games are popular genres that frequently glamorize or sensationalize violence, potentially desensitizing audiences to its impact.
2. When you have finished, list some nonviolent attitudes that you are aware of within American society and give some examples.
Despite the presence of violence in American culture, some nonviolent attitudes and values prevail within American society. Some examples include:
1.
Commitment to Nonviolent Protest:
Throughout American history, numerous movements and protests have advocated for social change through nonviolent means. For
example, the civil rights movement led by figures like Martin Luther King Jr. utilized sit-
ins, marches, and boycotts to challenge racial segregation and discrimination.
2.
Promotion of Diplomacy and Conflict Resolution:
The United States has often played a role in international diplomacy and conflict resolution efforts, seeking peaceful resolutions to conflicts and disputes. Diplomatic initiatives such as peace negotiations, mediation, and international treaties reflect a commitment to resolving differences without violence.
3.
Emphasis on Community and Volunteerism:
American society values community engagement, volunteerism, and collective action to address social issues and improve local communities. Initiatives such as community service projects, charitable organizations, and volunteer opportunities promote cooperation and mutual support without resorting to violence.
3. Do you believe that the government has a role to play with gun violence? or is it up to the
individuals to stop the violence, perhaps with more guns?
Yes, the government has a role to play in addressing gun violence. It can implement laws and policies to regulate access to firearms, promote gun safety measures, and support programs aimed at preventing violence. While individuals also have a responsibility to contribute to reducing violence, relying solely on more guns is not a solution, as it can escalate conflicts and
increase the risk of harm. Balancing individual rights with public safety is important in addressing gun violence effectively.
4. This is what the Constitution says about guns in the Second
Amendment. " A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Do you believe that the Constitution provides limits on what weapons can people carry or when or where? Do you believe that the Constitution allows for little limits on gun carrying?
The Constitution does not provide explicit guidance on the specific types of weapons that can be carried or the circumstances under which they can be carried. Instead, these issues are typically addressed through legislation, regulation, and judicial interpretation, considering public safety, individual rights, and societal interests.
5. The second amendment talks about the right to bear arms but does not mention any restrictions of the types of guns or ammo that individuals can use. Do you think that government should limit the kind of weapons or the ammo that individuals can carry?
The government should limit the kinds of weapons, or ammunition individuals can carry to promote public safety and reduce the risk of gun violence. By restricting access to high-capacity firearms and ammunition designed for rapid and mass shootings, the government can help prevent tragedies and protect communities from harm. These limitations aim to balance the rights
of individuals to own firearms with the need to safeguard public well-being.
6. The second amendment speaks about "a well-regulated militia"… how much should the government regulate and how much individuals should be able to carry weapons?
The Second Amendment mentions "a well-regulated militia," which suggests that the government has a role in regulating firearms. However, it also protects the right of individuals to bear arms. Finding the right balance between government regulation and individual rights is important. The government should implement reasonable rules to ensure public safety while respecting the rights of responsible gun owners. This might include background checks, restrictions on certain firearms, and training requirements while allowing individuals to own guns for lawful purposes like self-defense and hunting.
7. What are your thoughts about the shootings in El Paso? Was someone you know hurt or affected by the tragedy?
The shootings in El Paso, like all acts of violence, are profoundly troubling and tragic. They cause immense pain and suffering for the victims, their families, and the community as a whole. My heart goes out to all those who were affected by this senseless act of violence. While I don't personally know anyone hurt or affected by the tragedy, I recognize its profound impact on countless lives, and I hope for healing and strength for all those affected. Communities need to come together to support one another and to work towards preventing such tragedies from happening in the future.
8. What are your beliefs about "campus carry". Individuals can carry guns in classrooms since two years ago.
I believe that the policy of "campus carry," allowing individuals to carry guns in classrooms, can be a complex and contentious issue. While I understand the desire for self-defense and personal protection, I also have concerns about the potential risks and implications of having firearms in academic settings. It's important to consider the safety and well-being of everyone on campus, including students, faculty, and staff.
9. Does campus carry make classrooms safer? or are guns an invitation to use guns? In my view, the question of whether campus carry makes classrooms safer is a complex one. While some argue that allowing individuals to carry guns can deter potential attackers and enhance personal safety, others express concerns that the presence of firearms could increase the likelihood of gun-related incidents or escalate conflicts. I believe in both. It's important to consider various factors, such as training requirements, mental health support, and campus security measures when evaluating the impact of campus carry on overall safety.
10. What are typical reactions in the immediate aftermath of a mass shooting? Are they the
same reactions six months later?
In the immediate aftermath of a mass shooting, typical reactions include shock, grief, fear, and calls for action to prevent similar tragedies in the future. There's often an outpouring of support for the victims and their families, as well as discussions about gun control, mental health, and community safety.
Six months later, reactions may vary. While some may still feel the impact of the shooting deeply and continue to advocate for change, others may have moved on to some extent or shifted
their focus to other issues.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
11. Is gun control popular in your family or your friends? In my family and among my friends, opinions on gun control vary. Some are supportive of stricter gun control measures, believing they can help reduce violence and promote safety. Others are more hesitant, expressing concerns about the impact on individual rights and freedoms. We often have respectful discussions about this topic, recognizing that considering different perspectives is complex and important
12. Do you believe your beliefs are influenced by what your classmates think?
No, I do not, or in fact, by anyone.
13. Who are others that influence your opinion? No one; I am very solid in my beliefs.
14. If you were to change gun policies, what would you do?
If I were to change gun policies, I would focus on implementing comprehensive background checks for all gun purchases to help keep firearms out of the hands of individuals who pose a risk
to themselves or others. I would also support measures to restrict access to high-capacity magazines and military-style assault weapons while still respecting the rights of responsible gun owners. Additionally, I would prioritize investments in mental health resources and violence prevention programs to address the root causes of gun violence and promote community safety.
15. As a citizen or as a member of this community, do you feel empowered to make a change?
Yes, as a citizen and a community member, I feel empowered to make a change. Whether through voting, participating in community organizations, or advocating for the causes I believe in, my actions can shape policies and make positive changes in my community. It's important to stay informed, engage with others, and work together towards common goals to create a better future for everyone.