6659903- Political Scienceedited (1) (1) (4)

docx

School

York University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

2000

Subject

Political Science

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by ElderCloverPanther26

Running Head: POLITICAL SCIENCE 1 The New Canadian Imperialism and the Military Coup in Honduras Name Institutional Affiliation

POLITICAL SCIENCE 2 The New Canadian Imperialism and the Military Coup in Honduras Introduction Tyler Shipley's "The New Canadian Imperialism and the Military Coup in Honduras" gives a top-notch case study of the role of Canada in backing the Honduran military coup of 2009 and its wider ramifications in the context of current imperialism. Canada's economic interests and status as a secondary imperialist power, in step with Shipley's interpretation, explain why the United States of America helps an anti-democratic kingdom in spite of its apparent commitment to peace and security (Shipley, 2013). In order to shield its monetary investments in Honduras, Canada has been pushing for hyper-neoliberalism there, that is a mirrored image of its broader international programs to increase its capital. This essay will make a study case that Canada's foreign coverage picks, mainly on Honduras, are encouraged with the aid of the monetary pastimes. By transferring the focal point far away from the principal superpowers and onto Canada, a brand-new attitude on international dynamics emerges when we analyze the U.S. function as a secondary imperialist power. Shipley argues that Canada's overseas policy is strategically aligned with financial pursuits, especially in areas like Honduras, in which Canadian investments are big, even though Canada will not have a first-rate hegemonic have an effect on the arena area (Shipley, 2013). The reality that economic issues thing into political choices is further validated with the aid of Shipley's claim that Canada helps hyper-neoliberalism in Honduras with a purpose to shield its investments. This position exemplifies Canada's focus on profit and provides insight into the larger pattern of influence exerted by secondary imperialist countries in order to maintain and grow their economic dominance in the Global South.

POLITICAL SCIENCE 3 Beyond a basic examination of Canadian foreign policy toward Honduras, Shipley's thesis delves into the complex web of interdependencies among economic interests, political choices, and the foundations of contemporary imperialism (Shipley, 2013). The purpose of this essay is to analyze and clarify these interconnected links in order to provide light on the foreign policy decisions made by Canada towards Honduras and their consequences in the larger framework of global economic expansion. Overview of the Work Canada has long been portrayed as a peacekeeping nation, but its participation in the Honduran coup breaks with that image, the article argues. Shipley's research sheds light on this seeming contradiction by showing that Canada has shown support for authoritarian governments in Honduras, mainly to protect its economic interests, even though it portrays itself as a peaceful and compassionate interventionist nation. The author makes it clear that Canada is more concerned with pursuing economic benefits and expanding its market share than with acting out of any kind of altruism. Shipley's careful analysis shows how the United States-dominated global network has influenced Canada's foreign policy, which has become increasingly capitalist and military (Shipley, 2013). Using the Honduran scenario as an example, the essay makes a strong case that Canada prefers to establish lucrative territories overseas, strengthening its position in the global economy at the expense of democratic rule and the well-being of local populations. In 2009, Canada was involved in a coup in Honduras, which, according to Tyler Shipley, represents a new kind of imperialism. According to the article, Canada has taken a paradoxical position by backing an anti-democratic government in Honduras despite its reputation as a peacekeeping nation. The rationale behind this change is that Canada supports authoritarian governments in the region in order to protect its economic interests, especially its investments.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

POLITICAL SCIENCE 4 The book by Shipley offers an insightful critique of Canada's imperialist tendencies in endorsing the Honduran military coup. Its strength is in the depth with which it examines imperialism, foreign policy, and economic ventures as a whole. Thorough research into both past and present circumstances and dynamics strengthens the thesis. Moreover, it makes a substantial addition to our knowledge of the nuances of Canadian imperialism and calls for additional research into the worldwide effects of this policy (Shipley, 2013). To back up his claims, Shipley cites imperial practices in Honduras that have come before Canada. This shows how the country's foreign policy has become more militaristic and capitalist. The argument is more convincing because the author thoroughly examines the Honduran instance to show how Canada's secondary imperialist stance is exemplified. According to Shipley, Canada is an imperialist force in its own right, pursuing capitalist objectives within the larger imperialist network that the US dominates. Because of its assertive stance in Honduras and other countries, the author argues, Canada's foreign policy is increasingly focused on creating spaces for profit and investment abroad. As a symbol of its larger ambitions in the Global South, the essay highlights Canada's connection with hyper-neoliberalism in Honduras (Shipley, 2013). Canadian capital benefits from neoliberal policies in Honduras, which Shipley ties to the country's economic objectives, while local communities and democratic governance suffer. Arguments Shipley deftly negotiates the intricate web of imperialism and Canada's role in Honduras. His perceptive analysis offers a multi-faceted view, demonstrating that Canada is more than just an American ally; it is an autonomous power with its own imperialist goals (Shipley, 2013). Furthermore, he argues that Canadian capitalism pursues profit through neocolonial endeavors is

POLITICAL SCIENCE 5 in line with larger academic conversations on modern imperialism and provides insightful analysis of the complex process of global capital expansion. Because of its impact on discussions of modern imperialism and Canadian foreign policy, Shipley's writing is highly relevant. The article encourages critical thinking about how economic interests, political maneuvering, and the consequences for democratic governance in developing nations intersect by bringing attention to Canada's role in Honduras and its alignment with imperialist efforts. Shipley places Canada's role in imperialism in a historical perspective, drawing attention to the fact that Honduras has experienced neocolonial rule in addition to direct colonial occupation. This essay argues that Canada fits into a larger historical pattern of imperialist dominance and exploitation by highlighting its congruence with neocolonial tendencies common in the Global South. The interests of Canada's capitalist class, according to Shipley, who is always looking for new ways to make money, dictate the country's foreign policy (Shipley, 2013). According to the author, Canadian firms reaped economic benefits from their backing for the Honduran coup and subsequent policies, which paved the way for Canadian capital expansion, particularly in resource extraction industries and investments (Shipley, 2013). Shipley argues that Canada's backing for authoritarian governments is at odds with its claims of promoting democracy, peace, and security abroad. The paper argues that Canada's support for regimes in Honduras that violate human rights and democratic procedures goes against its stated principles and shows that economic objectives take precedence over ethical ones. These points show that Canada's engagement in Honduras is representative of a larger pattern in which the country's foreign policy is heavily influenced by economic interests, especially those in the Global South, which causes inconsistencies between what the government says it believes and what it does (Shipley, 2013). Therefore, although Shipley's arguments

POLITICAL SCIENCE 6 provide some insight into Canada's imperialist tendencies in Honduras, a more sophisticated examination that takes into consideration many geopolitical reasons, not limited to economic interests alone, would strengthen and broaden the argument. Further supporting evidence showing Canada's hands-on role in neoliberalism promotion in Honduras would strengthen the argument as a whole. Criticism and Analysis Canadian foreign policy toward Honduras is largely motivated by economic interests, according to the text. The complex nature of international relations is oversimplified when economic factors are considered in isolation from all others. Beyond simple economic interests, Canada's behavior could be greatly influenced by factors like geopolitics, ideological factors, strategic alliances, and the geopolitical influence of key world powers. To depict Canada as a secondary imperialist power suggests that it pursues its economic interests in the Global South independently. Nevertheless, a more thorough investigation is necessary to unravel the intricate web of imperialist networks and global power dynamics. To gain a more complete picture, it would be helpful to look at Canada's capitalist class alongside its contacts with major world powers and the complex web of relationships within imperialism as a whole. To back up Canada's role in Honduras, Shipley uses historical and economic circumstances (Shipley, 2013). Unfortunately, there is a dearth of concrete data in the book that shows how Canada actively promoted neoliberal policies in Honduras. Supporting the assertion of direct engagement and lending credence to the case would be a more substantial inclusion of specific examples or recorded policies that demonstrate Canada's economic influence or interventions in Honduras.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

POLITICAL SCIENCE 7 The complex web of interrelated elements in international relations is partially disregarded by the text, which centers on the role of Canada's economic interests in determining its foreign policy toward Honduras. Canadian engagements are shaped by a multitude of factors, including economic interests, geopolitical agendas, ideological alignments, and partnerships with important global powers (Shipley, 2013). Simplifying these intricacies could result in a narrow comprehension of the all-encompassing character of Canada's foreign policy choices, which could undermine the complex forces that influence its behavior in Honduras. Shipley's argument emphasizes Canada's role in Honduras through the use of historical and economic circumstances. Nevertheless, the claim lacks support due to the absence of specific proof regarding Canada's involvement in promoting and executing neoliberal policies in Honduras. More concrete examples or policies with supporting documentation of Canada's economic activities or influence in Honduran affairs would strengthen the claim. The inclusion of this would strengthen the argument and provide credence to the assertion that Canada actively shaped neoliberalism in Honduras. Conclusion Finally, analyzing Canada's imperialist tendencies in backing the Honduran military coup, Shipley's article offers a thought-provoking conclusion. The reason it works so well is because it delves deeply into the relationship between imperialism, foreign policy, and economic investments. A thorough analysis of past circumstances and present dynamics strengthens the thesis. A deeper dive into the worldwide ramifications of Canadian imperialism is warranted in light of the text's substantial contributions to our understanding of the topic.

POLITICAL SCIENCE 8 Reference Shipley, T. (2013). The new Canadian imperialism and the military coup in Honduras. Latin American Perspectives , 40 (5), 44–61. doi:10.1177/0094582x13492129

6659903- Political Scienceedited (1) (1) (4)

Related Documents