Assignment week 2

.docx

School

Grand Canyon University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

508

Subject

Psychology

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

6

Uploaded by gretchenkrisle

Report
Assessment Description Creating an annotated bibliography will enhance your research abilities by critically assessing scholarly sources and effectively integrating relevant information into research papers.  To complete this assignment, select three journal articles from the 10 references in your "Reference List Assignment." Create an annotated bibliography for each of the three references.  Each annotation must have 150-200 words, making a total of 450-600 words for the entire assignment. Each annotation should have the following elements: APA style reference of the article being annotated. A paraphrased summary of the article (see note on paraphrasing below). An assessment of why it is a scholarly reference. A reflection on how it is applicable to your research. Note: Go to the Student Success Center and search key words "Preparing Annotated Bibliographies" for help with this assignment. Follow these steps for all three references you chose. Note on Paraphrasing: Paraphrasing the ideas of others is a requirement in academic writing and graduate study. Paraphrasing is using your own words to restate ideas or information from a source material. As you write each annotation use the following three main steps for paraphrasing: Identify the original idea(s) in the article. Identify general points regarding the idea(s). Summarize the general points of the article in your own words (paraphrase). Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. Navigating boundary crossing (Sapp, 2023) is an article that pertains to the issue of boundary crossings in counseling and the ethical considerations involved. Counselors may become involved in a variety of relationships with clients that blur the counseling lines, and it offers methods for resolving these conflicts while making sure ethical principles are upheld. Examples of these include buying food for a client who is starving, paying for an Uber or taxi for a client who is waiting for a ride home in the cold, or going to an adolescent client's high school graduation. Although some scenarios may be apparent, there are others that may not be as evident. Some situations in which these boundary extensions might not be evident include living or working in a remote area or dealing with clients whose children attend the same school as yours. The article provides four real-world strategies to guide you through a boundary-crossing dilemma and potentially prevent an ethical violation: use an ethical decision-making model, seek supervision, consider a referral to another counselor, and seek legal consultation. This article is a scholarly article because it was published in an academic periodical and contains multiple citations throughout the article along with a reference page. It pertains to my research on the issue of counselor- client boundaries in counseling ethics.
Sapp, T. (2023). Navigating Boundary Crossings. Counseling Today, 66(4), 23–24. Clients who stalk their counselor (Ring & Pollard, 2021) is an article about the importance of establishing boundaries at the beginning of a professional relationship to explain the therapeutic relationship, describe the course of therapy, and explain the boundaries of confidentiality. Sometimes clients cross these boundaries by stalking their mental health practitioners, even though they initially consent to these terms. There is no connection between the frequency of stalking and a clinician's training or experience; stalking is an intolerant crime. The frequency of stalking is not correlated with a counselor's expertise or skill level; stalking is a comprehensive crime. Even though stalking is a serious threat to their safety, most counselors say they feel unprepared to handle this situation. In this article it provides systemic prevention strategies. These strategies center on making sure that all staff members working in the mental health field receive ongoing training and instruction on provider safety, how to recognize stalking behaviors, how to protect practitioners, and what steps to take if a clinician suspects they are being stalked. This article is a scholarly article because it was published in an academic journal and contains multiple citations throughout the article along with a reference page. It pertains to my research on the issue of counselor-client boundaries in counseling ethics. Ring, M. A., & Pollard, J. W. (2021). Clients Who Stalk Their Counselor. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 35(3), 290–311. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/87568225.2020.1737613 The article Boundaries and the little things that matter (Francis, 2019) gives advice on how to set and up boundaries as a licensed counselor without running the risk of spoiling therapy relationships. Helping the client comprehend the value of boundaries and how they safeguard the therapeutic relationship are some of the topics discussed. Other topics include sharing boundaries responsibly and facilitates a thorough decision-making process by managing boundaries and navigating the obstacles that clients present. We no longer operate as professional counselors in a world where, with rare exceptions, we uphold strict boundaries out of concern that the therapeutic relationship would be tainted. There are times when it is appropriate to cross boundaries, but one must take the necessary safety measures and consult with the client first. In the long run, these expansions might strengthen the therapeutic alliance, foster a tighter bond, and promote more recovery. However, no matter what, the debate and decision must be recorded in the case file. This article is a scholarly article because it was published in an education periodical. It contains multiple citations throughout the article along with a reference page. It pertains to my research on the issue of counselor- client boundaries in counseling ethics. Francis, P. C. (2019). Boundaries and the little things that matter. Counseling Today, 62(2), 12–13.
Reference List Assignment Assessment Description To prepare you for your counseling program, you will be creating a reference list to demonstrate your research skills, observance of ethical principles, and ability to give proper credit to the original authors. In this assignment, you will choose a research topic focused on counseling ethics. For your research, you must use the GCU Library.  First, review the Topic 2 Resource "Getting Started With Scholarly Sources" for a description of what is considered a scholarly source. Then create a title page and a reference list with 10 references from the last 5 years using the current edition of APA style. While permalinks are not part of an APA citation, they do make the information easier to find in the future. At the end of each citation in your reference list, provide the permalinks (or persistent links) for all sources unless one is unavailable. For more information on how to locate the persistent links, review "Persistent Links" in the Topic 2 Resources. Include each of the following types of references: Book Journal articles Website Dissertation/thesis from a database Streaming video Book chapter Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Power’s influence on boundary-crossings between counselor educators and counselor education students Burns, S. T., & Cheng, M. (2020). Power’s influence on boundary-crossings between counselor educators and counselor education students.  Cogent Education 7 (1), 1–23. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1795048 Permalink: https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx? direct=true&db=edsdoj&AN=edsdoj.2db4aa1a3c14444a98097b5bd026cc67&site=eds- live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=eds1
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help