PSY 375 Module Four Lab Worksheet (2)

.docx

School

Southern New Hampshire University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

375

Subject

Psychology

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

8

Uploaded by AgentSummer13194

Report
PSY 375 Module Four Lab Worksheet Encoding Specificity Lab Data Study/Test Cue* Proportion Correct Weak/Weak 0.583 Weak/Strong 0.833 Strong/Weak 0.417 Strong/Strong 0.750 Lure 0.896 1
Lab Questions Do your results support the encoding specificity hypothesis? Why or why not? Note: Consider what led to the best results—having strong semantic associations between cue and target, or matching cues at encoding and test? My results do align with what was predicted. The prediction was that the target would be more recongizable if it was paried with the same cue. I did have a better recollection of the target when the cues were the same as phase 1. I had a hard time with strong/weak. Describe a real or hypothetical example of a situation that demonstrates encoding specificity. Ensure that your example is original and not from course materials. 2
An example of this would be if you study for a test in a specific room, and then take the test in that room you will perform better then taking the test in another room. Another example would be listening to music when studying and listening to the same music when taking the test. Levels of Processing Lab Data Condition/Task Proportion Correct Letter/Encoding 1.000 Rhyme/Encoding 1.000 Semantic/Encoding 0.900 Letter/Test 0.600 Rhyme/Test 0.600 Semantic/Test 0.850 Lure/Test 0.400 3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help