Article Crtique- Brady Adams

.docx

School

Sam Houston State University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

3301

Subject

Psychology

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

3

Uploaded by BradyAdams21

Brady Adams Citation: Duchaine, Jolivette, Fredrick, and Alberto (2018) titled, " Increase Engagement with Response Cards.” Article Summary: The article "Increase Engagement with Response Cards" discussed the different levels and types of students with disabilities. In response to the different disabilities and challenging behaviors, this article dives into student engagement, involving effective instructional strategies, and student OTR during instruction. As well as introducing “Response Cards” and how to use response cards in a high school inclusion class. With the method setting and how to design or independent variable inside the response cards. Ending the article with the results of the previous response with the response cards for students with disabilities and challenging behavior. The primary findings in this article that I have found are that” The IDEA definitions of students with LD, OHI, ASD, and EBD differ in criteria, but the characteristics of secondary students with LD, OHI, ASD, and EBD may present similarly with an inability to learn without accommodations, inappropriate and disruptive classroom behaviors, and deficits in social skills and the ability to self-manage (Heward, 2013; IDEA, 2004) (pg158). Also “Using class-wide interventions may increase opportunities for student participation, thereby increasing student learning by actively involving all students (Carnahan et al., 2009). The part of the Response Cards and the detailed information about them stated “Response cards (RC) are preprinted or write-on cards provided to students that allow each student to answer all questions posed by the teacher during instruction (Gardner et al., 1994; Kellum et al., 2001) engaging the learner by
requiring students to take an active role during instruction (Adamson & Lewis, 2017; Christle & Schuster, 2003)(pg159). The article was essential to the study of individuals with disabilities because it gives actual information and an idea of how many different disabilities can be considered inside the IDEA, with the bit of information inside the introduction including the “percentages of the secondary education dropout” or even including the readings last week as the post-graduation, including the employment, is concise and “inconsistent.” This article is also essential with the introduction about the response cards, how to use them, and why inside a high school inclusion. This article was straightforward to read through until the end when the charts were being implemented. I have always struggled with reading specific charts. However, the background knowledge in the article made understanding what was being shown easier. This information, however, is essential to me as a future educator. I saw the actual numbers of students and the different disabilities or behavior disorders, the drastic numbers of dropouts, and the post- graduation employment. As well as the usage of the response cards can give more engagement with students to better assist them in the real world outside of secondary education. I strongly feel that this information needs to be used more often in every secondary classroom. This article co-exists with last week's reading and gives more detailed information on post-graduation and how to respond to the increasing numbers with an idea or method.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help