What is the KJV only movement?
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Liberty University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
500
Subject
Religion
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by AndrewPedde
Many people have strong and serious objections to the translation methods
and textual basis for the new translations and therefore take a strong stance
in favor of the King James Version. Others are equally convinced that the
newer translations are an improvement over the KJV in their textual basis
and translation methodology. GotQuestions.org does not want to limit its
ministry to those of the "KJV Only" persuasion. Nor do we want to limit
ourselves to those who prefer the NIV, NAS, NKJV, etc. Note - the purpose of
this article is not to argue against the use of the King James Version. Rather,
the focus of this article is to contend with the idea that the King James
Version is the only Bible English speakers should use.
The KJV Only movement claims its loyalty to be to the Textus Receptus, a
Greek New Testament manuscript compilation completed in the 1500s. To
varying degrees, KJV Only advocates argue that God guided Erasmus (the
compiler of the Textus Receptus) to come up with a Greek text that is
perfectly identical to what was originally written by the biblical authors.
However, upon further examination, it can be seen that KJV Only advocates
are not loyal to the Textus Receptus, but rather only to the KJV itself. The
New Testament of the New King James Version is based on the Textus
Receptus, just as the KJV is. Yet, KJV Only advocates label the NKJV just as
heretical as they do the NIV, NAS, etc.
Beyond the NKJV, other attempts (such as the
KJ21
and
MEV
) have been
made to make minimal updates to the KJV, only "modernizing" the archaic
language, while using the exact same Greek and Hebrew manuscripts. These
attempts are rejected nearly as strongly as the NKJV and the other newer
Bible translations. This proves that KJV Only advocates are loyal to the King
James Version itself, not to the Textus Receptus. KJV Only advocates have no
desire or plan to update the KJV in any way. The KJV certainly contains
English that is outdated, archaic, and sometimes confusing to modern
English speakers and readers. It would be fairly simple to publish an updated
KJV with the archaic words and phrases updated into modern 21st century
English. However, any attempt to edit the KJV in any way results in
accusations from KJV Only advocates of heresy and perversion of the Word of
God.
When the Bible is translated for the first time into a new language today, it is
translated into the language that culture speaks and writes today, not the
way they spoke and wrote 400 years ago. The same should be true in
English. The Bible was written in the common, ordinary language of the
people at that time. Bible translations today should be the same. That is why
Bible translations must be updated and revised as languages develop and
change. The KJV Only movement is very English-focused in its thinking. Why
should people who read English be forced to read the Bible in
outdated/archaic English, while people of all other languages can read the
Bible in modern/current forms of their languages?
Our loyalties are to the original manuscripts of the Old and New Testaments,
written in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. Only the original languages are the
Word of God as He inspired it. A translation is only an attempt to take what is
said in one language and communicate it in another. The modern
translations are superb in taking the meaning of the original languages and
communicating it in a way that we can understand in English. However, none
of the modern translations are perfect. Every one contains verses that are at
least somewhat mistranslated. By comparing and contrasting several
different translations, it is often easier to get a good grasp on what the verse
is saying than by only using one translation. Our loyalty should not be to any
one English translation, but to the inspired, inerrant Word of God that is
communicated by the Holy Spirit through the translations (
2 Timothy 3:16-
17
).
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help