maldridge_Worksheet3

.docx

School

Capella University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

5400

Subject

Religion

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by MagistratePheasant2892

Report
Name _Madison Aldridge BIBL 3213 New Testament Introduction - Online Worksheet chapter 3 Indicate whether the following statements are true or false. 1. There is considerable evidence to indicate that Matthew originally circulated without a title. False 2. There is considerable evidence to indicate that the present titles were attached to the gospels about A.D. 125. False 3. Most modern scholars argue that Matthew was originally written in Hebrew or Aramaic. False 4. According to G. D. Kilpatrick, Matthew is not the work of a single author but is a community product. True 5. Most scholars today opt for Syria as Matthew’s place of origin. True 6. Most scholars today hold that Matthew depended on Mark. True 7. Christians in the East were quite reluctant to accept Matthew into the canon. False Answer the following questions. 8. What are the three dominant theories concerning the structure of Matthew? 1. Some have detected a geographic framework that is related to Mark’s gospel. 2. Following suggestions made by Stonehouse, Lohmeyer, and Krentz, Kingsbury has argued for three large sections tightly tied to a Christological development. 3. The most frequently proposed structures turn on the observation that Matthew presents five discourses, each of which begins in a specific context and ends with a formula found nowhere else. 9. What is Martin Hengel’s theory concerning the naming of the gospels? Argues that as soon as two or more gospels were publicly read in any one church-a phenomenon that certainly occurred, he thinks, not later than A.D. 100-it would have been necessary to distinguish between them by some such device as a title. 10. What objections have been raised against Hengel’s theory? The gospels could circulate anonymously for up to sixty years, and then in the second century suddenly unanimous attribution to certain authors. 11. How do modern scholars interpret the statement of Papias? Modern scholars tend to date Papias to A.D. 140 or later; but if Irenaeus is right and Eusebius is wrong, then there is no reason Papias could not have written or more years earlier, and with excellent access to accurate information. 12. What arguments are generally presented by those who deny the apostolic authorship of Matthew? Those who deny apostolic authorship of this book are inclined to interpret the same evidence as the reason why the unknown author (s) chose to associate the book with Matthew as opposed to some other apostle.
13. What arguments are presented by those who date Matthew after A. D. 707 The adoption of a date after A.D. 70, by which time most of Palestine was destroyed, and the influence of Streeter, who argued for Antioch as the provenance of this gospel. 14. What arguments are presented by those who date Matthew before A. D. 70?7 They argue that if Mark wrote about 65, he was so close to the events that he could see how political circumstances were shaping up. 15. Why was Matthew written? What are the most common theories? To meet the needs of believers in his own area. There are three common theories; 1. Some have detected a geographic framework that is related to Mark’s gospel. 2. Following suggestions made by Stonehouse, Lohmeyer, and Krentz, Kingsbury has argued for three large sections, tightly tied to Christological development. 3. The most frequently proposed structures proposed structures turn on the observation that Matthew presents five discourses, each of which begins in a specific context and ends with a formula found nowhere else. 16. What peculiar contributions does Matthew make to the canon of the New Testament? 1. Matthew preserves large blocks of Jesus’ teaching in the discourses already enumerated. 2. Matthew complements the other gospels, Luke, by giving an alternative account of Jesus’ virginal conception, cast in Joseph’s perspective. 3. More generally, Matthew'’s use of the Old Testament is particularly rich and complex. 4. In the same way, Matthew’s treatment of the law is especially suggestive. 5. Matthew'’s gospel is foundational not only as one looks backward to the scriptures of the old covenant but also as one looks forward to what the church became. 6. Finally, there are shadings to Matthew’s portrait of Jesus-surely the heart of his gospel-that are unique. 17. According to Carson and Moo, what is the seven-point outline of Matthew? 1. The prologue 2. The gospel of the kingdom 3. The kingdom extended under Jesus’ authority 4. Teaching and preaching the gospel of the kingdom: rising opposition 5. The glory and the shadow: progressive polarization 6. Opposition and eschatology: the triumph of grace 7. The passion and resurrection of Jesus
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help